12.6 C
Auckland
Tuesday, May 24, 2022
-- Free Advertisement --spot_img
HomeOpinionLeo Molloy shot down for anti-jab hate speech

Leo Molloy shot down for anti-jab hate speech

Most Popular

Leo Molloy, an Auckland restaurant owner with aspirations to become mayor of the city, has been shot down on Twitter for a rabid anti-jab statement.

The Twitter reaction followed Molloy’s opinion in the NZHerald in which he outlined the ‘science’ relating to Pfizer COVID jabs, and confirmed his support for more drastic measures to force ‘anti-vaxxers’ to take the jab.

Leo Molloy news

Molloy’s opinion reads like a love letter to Pfizer. It seems Leo has fallen head over heels in love with a company considered to be in the top three most evil and corrupt companies in the history of western capitalism. I hate to break it to you Leo, but if Pfizer were a person he/she would have died in prison a long time ago. Just last week we saw this corruption in action (for the upteenth time in the company’s sordid history), when a whistleblower revealed Pfizer falsified testing data relating to its mRNA experimental jab. That revelation was published in the prestigious British Medical Journal. Other countries have revealed how Pfizer’s instatiable greed and dishonesty are screwing them over.

Molloy was the man who breached a court order in publishing the name of British Backpacker Grace Millane’s killer at a time when it was suppressed. Molloy did so presumably because he believed, in part, that he had a right to freedom of speech, or that New Zealanders had a right to know who the killer was. The same man is now wanting to deny New Zealanders the right to choose what goes into their body, which is arguably, the most fundamental human right of all.

Molloy’s use of the word ‘anti-vaxxer’ is hate speech. I refuse to take the experimental mRNA jab, but that does not make me an ‘anti-vaxxer’. I am otherwise fully immunised, with all the normal childhood vaccines. I happily took a tetanus booster a couple of years ago before I travelled overseas. My two year old son is fully immunised. Calling me an ‘anti-vaxxer’ is akin to me calling Molloy a murderer because of his conviction for breaching name suppression. In future he should refer to us as anti-mRNA mandaters. Just because I am anti-mRNA mandate does not make me anti-vaccine, and, just because Molloy was guilty of one crime does not mean he is guilty of every crime.

In articulating his Pfizer fan-boy opinion, Molloy gives the impression that the science relating to mRNA jabs is settled, that everything he writes regarding mRNA’s use as a vaccine is scientific gospel. That is completely false. It is far from settled, in fact, a ferocious scientific war over this issue is taking place right now.

And here is the crux of the issue, as far as anti-mRNA mandaters like me go. How can the government mandate, and armchair scientists like Molloy cheerlead such an unethical policy, when there is NO scientific consensus as to mRNA’s efficacy and safety as a vaccine? It’s utter stupidity. Haven’t we learnt any lessons from history? And don’t tell me about the 1918 flu pandemic. That killed thousands within weeks. We’ve had COVID rampant in the community for nearly two years, with hundreds of cases each day, and about 50 people (most with other serious pre-existing conditions) have died with COVID, not of it. Look if this was the polio vax that was being mandated, or any other of the tried and tested ones, I’d be the first to line up and get the jab and passport.

Let’s look at the science and scientists opposing the mRNA madness. Some of them are the greatest living scientists of our generation. Between them they have won Nobel Prizes, Congressional honours, you name it. This is repeating information that has appeared in other posts, so I apologise in advance to our regular readers.

  • Dr. Peter Doshi, the senior editor of The British Medical Journal says it is misleading to even refer to the experimental mRNA medication as a ‘vaccine’. In his words mRNA is ‘qualitatively different’ from standard childhood vaccines that we all know and trust.
  • Dr. Doshi’s opinion is reflected in the fact that America’s premier dictionary Merriam-Webster recently had to change its definition of ‘vaccine’ because mRNA did not ‘increase immunity’ as per the original definition.
  • One of Australia’s leading immunologists, Professor Nikolay Petrovsky says mRNA technology used in ‘vaccines’ is in its infancy and any doctor that tells you they are safe is lying, because we simply don’t know.
  • A landmark Swedish study released last week found evidence to suggest that the spike proteins from COVID jabs enter the nucleus of cells and ‘shear’ human DNA completely in half. The mRNA proteins also prohibit the proteins designed to fix the DNA from working. The horrifying implication is that the mRNA jab will cause or accelerate cancers or reignite those in remission. Validation studies need to be undertaken urgently to confirm the Swedish conclusion. Don’t you think it would be prudent for governments to pause the jab roll-outs in the meantime, just to be on the safe side, while we await validation? Some scientists have suspected the mRNA/cancer link, and this important study confirms it.
  • Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi who is a leading virus expert in microbiology in Germany, one of the most cited research scientists in German history, former professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz and head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, says:
    ‘Gene-based [ie. mRNA] vaccines are an absolute danger to mankind and their use at present violates the Nuremberg codex, such that everyone who is propagating their use should be put before a tribunal. Especially the vaccination of children is something that is so criminal that I have no words to express my horror … We are horribly worried that there’s going to be an impact on fertility. And this will be seen in years or decades from now. And this is potentially one of the greatest crimes, simply one of the greatest crimes imaginable.’
  • Dr. Peter McCullough, Professor of Medicine with more than 1000 publications and more than 600 citations in the US National Library of medicine, a world-renowned expert and leader in cardio and renal medicine, who has cured many hundreds of COVID patients with more than a 99% success rate states:
    ‘The current code vaccines [ie mRNA]: AstraZeneca, J&J, Pfizer & Moderna right now are obsolete. They do not cover the new variance. Patients are failing on these vaccines, they’re being hospitalised and getting sick despite having the vaccines. The vaccines at this point in time have amounted to record mortality and percent injury, and should be considered unsafe and unfit for human use. The failed mass COVID-19 vaccination programme will go down as one of the most deadly in history.’
  • Nobel Laureate Dr. Luc Montagnier, expert virologist, awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2008 with a colleague for his discovery of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) says:
    ‘We’re in unknown territory and proclaim mandatory vaccines for everyone. It’s insanity. It’s vaccination insanity that I absolutely condemn.’
  • Dr. Zev Zelenko, a Nobel prize nominee and Presidential Medal of Freedom nominee who has successfully treated hundreds of Covid patients with a 100% survival rate, where his patients rarely require hospitalisation says:
    ‘COVID war criminals should face Nuremberg-style trials for crimes against humanity.’
  • Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, virologist and vaccine expert, who sits at the top of his field in what are probably the deepest and most insightful (non-Big Pharma funded) scientific articles that you will ever read on COVID makes the following claims:
    ‘The mass vaccination hype will undoubtedly enter history as the most reckless experiment in the history of medicine.’
    ‘Major outbreaks in countries with full vaccination rates … show that Herd Immunity is not improbable but impossible. Mass vaccination campaigns may have a beneficial short-time effect in that they reduce viral spread and protect vulnerable people from disease (e.g., elderly people and those with underlying disease), but will eventually drive the propagation of more infectious variants.’
  • Dr. Reiner Fuellmich (who was a lead lawyer in suing Volkswagen over Diesel-gate for $4.3 billion – the largest automotive fine in history) has assembled an associated team of more than 10,000 doctors and more than 100 lawyers to bring a Nuremberg 2.0 type trial in relation to the vaccine-pushers; he states:
    ‘The frauds committed by Volkswagen and Deutsche Bank pale in comparison to the damage wrought by those who sold the COVID-19 crisis as the worst viral outbreak to hit the world in more than a century and used it to cause media-driven panic, government overreach and human suffering on a scale still not fully quantified.’
  • Professor Robert Malone, a leading scientist in the development of mRNA technology says that mass vaccination using mRNA technology is wrong.
  • Professor Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test (for which he received the Nobel Prize) which is used by governments, including New Zealand, to determine COVID infection says the test should never be used to determine if someone has a COVID infection.
  • There are now countless studies from around the world which conclude the mRNA jab does not prevent transmission, nor does it protect you against COVID in a high percentage of cases. One of Canada’s top immunologists Professor Byram Birdle says the more vaccinated a country is against COVID, the more problems it has with COVID. Gibraltar, with a 100% jab rate has had to cancel Christmas because of rising infection numbers. How much more proof do you need that the jabs don’t work, yet Leo wants to punish those who don’t want to take a faulty product? For the first time in history a medication’s failure is being blamed on those who don’t take it.

You see Leo, there is no scientific consensus as to the safety and efficacy of this experimental mRNA vaccine technology. Where there is no consensus there should not be mandates, and where there is risk, however small, there must be choice.

The right to refuse medical treatment, which originated in Nuremburg following the discovery of Nazi atrocities in World War II, is in place precisely for these circumstances. It’s exactly the reason why my grandfather went to fight in that war, so I could exercise that right without fear or favour. And we must also never forget that it was through the legitimising but corruptible power of science and law that Hitler and his regime came to power in the first place.

All around the world tens of thousands of doctors and nurses are leaving their jobs over these mandates. You would think this would cause a penny to drop in Leo’s mind. If so many health professionals don’t want to take the experimental mRNA jab, even to keep the jobs they love and rely on to live, they must have seen things that cause them concern. 10,000 scientists and doctors around the world signed the Rome Declaration last month, calling for an end to the mRNA roll-outs. One kiwi nurse who is leaving her job says she can guarantee the hospitals are full of vaccine injured. Last week Australian senator Bob Katter described how all 8 of his parliamentary staff were injured after the jab, including two deaths. There are millions of stories from around the world, from every country, of vaccine deaths or injuries. It’s no wonder people are hesitant.

Leo says ‘follow the science’. We are Leo. We are following the Darwins, Einsteins and Flemings of our generation, while you’re following Pfizer product brochures.

A portion of Molloy’s opinion piece was posted on Twitter by user @viewspotnz. It reads:

‘Whilst most of the rabid infodemic disciples are harmless, it is important that Government, health services, businesses large and small, and local body regulators make the life of these non-conformists untenable. Deny them the right to anything useful: travel, shopping, socialising, events, to play sport, even a visit to the local park.

If they don’t want to be safe members of the society in which we live, they must relinquish their rights to enjoy the things we take for granted in a healthy functioning society.’

The response from other users was brutal:

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of dailytelegraph.co.nz.

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please remember to keep comments respectful. We believe in free speech. Unfortunately, due the actions of one online troll, we have had to implement a manual moderation system to ensure online discussion remains civil and constructive. Your views and voice are important. Your comment will be published after moderation unless it contains hate speech or defamatory statements.

2 COMMENTS

  1. Molloy is one of the delusional jabbers that still actually thinks the jab and jab passports is about protecting people’s health! Hahahahaha! It should be clear to anyone with half a brain that covid has nothing to do with health! It’s about putting in place a system by stealth to control the populations of western democracy. Wake up you jabbed iodiots like Molloy !

  2. Sheep like Molloy can’t see the big picture here. Covid is the biggest scam in history. MRNA mass vaccination will go down as a genocide. This is just a pretext to fundamentally change social structures in the west and the vax passport is the first step in the perpetual human digital slavery. It’s going to be China’s social credit system on steroids and irreversible

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Opinion

Daily Life

Wellington
broken clouds
12.2 ° C
12.5 °
10.5 °
88 %
1.5kmh
75 %
Tue
14 °
Wed
14 °
Thu
10 °
Fri
13 °
Sat
15 °
- Free Advertisement -spot_img
- Make Your Voice Heard -spot_img

Latest