Natural immunity was dismissed by government and mainstream media “experts” in NZ and abroad as a “conspiracy theory” during the COVID “pandemic”.
Leading US vaccine advocate Dr. Paul Offit has acknowledged that the Biden administration deliberately ignored natural immunity as a valid alternative to COVID-19 vaccination, not for scientific reasons but because of “bureaucratic concerns”.
In a video circulating on social media, Offit admitted that data supported natural infection as protection against severe disease, but the Biden government chose to mandate vaccines universally rather than deal with the “logistics of verifying prior infection”.
As a result, millions of Americans were forced to comply with vaccine mandates or face severe consequences, including job loss and social exclusion.
Offit’s revelation confirms that vaccine mandates were driven by administrative convenience rather than science.
Despite studies, including those from Israel, showing natural immunity provided strong protection, the administration dismissed these findings to avoid the challenge of proving prior infection.
The decision led to the firing of frontline workers, the censorship of medical professionals advocating for natural immunity, and the creation of societal divisions between the vaccinated and the naturally immune.
Orfitt’s confession raises critical questions about the motivations behind rigid mandates, potential conflicts of interest, and the broader implications of prioritising bureaucracy over public health.
Offit is a pediatrician, infectious disease expert, and vaccine advocate who serves as the Director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and a professor at the University of Pennsylvania.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, he was a key member of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), helping review and advise on vaccine approvals. A strong proponent of vaccination, he frequently defended COVID-19 vaccines in the media but later expressed skepticism about certain booster recommendations.
Speaking to NZ legacy media in 2020 about a Hong Kong man’s “re-infection” Malaghan Institute Director Graham Le Gros said, “It probably means that vaccines are the way to go rather than letting herd immunity and natural infection make a population protected from the virus, there’s too much variation, so let’s make a good vaccine that does the job.”
Dr. Paul Offit says the Biden Administration knew in early 2021 that natural immunity “would prevent against serious disease” but they mandated the COVID vaccine anyway, because “that was just another layer that they didn’t want to consider” pic.twitter.com/YHaDpk9WMe
— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) February 19, 2025
How was the decision made to ignore immunity from prior infection?
In this clip, Paul Offit describes how he and another person advised in favor of accepting natural immunity, while two others voted against it.
A🧵 on why that was possibly the worst decision of the pandemic: pic.twitter.com/OAM3TvNuhY
— Alexandros Marinos 🏴☠️ (@alexandrosM) February 10, 2022
Natural immunity was NOT dismissed by the Amish though.
Are “bureaucratic concerns” an euphemism for bureaucratic bullmanure? Maximising big pharma’s profit was the obvious motive. Their profits were maximised by wrecking our natural immunities then exploiting our weakened immunities for their profit.
Whats the difference between having had covid and having natural immunity and not having covid and not wanting the vacine and waiting until they get covid as to acquire natural immunity? Nothing.
covid is so weak that natural immunity naturally deals with it and we wouldn’t even know that we’ve had it (as long as we didn’t do anything silly to weaken our immunities – like taking those jabs).
It’s not even a thing. Just relabelled symptoms (everything from a sniffy nose to gunshot wounds, or you know, nothing at all) and a phony genetic sequence dreamed up on Drosten’s computer. All other talk around lab leaks and “natural immunity” is gaslighting and second stage psy-ops (the emperor has no clothes).
Shouldn’t have to show natural immunity from having covid. I would still be denied access to some parts of society if that was the case.
Should just be a choice to have the jab or not. Though, it should never have been approved for most of the population, and should be removed from use long ago.
Dr is an expert of derp
“Science” should never be used as an excuse to mandate or coerce medical treatments. That smells of fascism, that’s what the Nazis did to the Jews and that’s why the Nuremburg Protocol was formulated.
Individual sovereignty should reign above all else, otherwise we do not have a society worth supporting or saving.