Ilya Smirin stated on air that the game was perhaps ‘not for women’.
Ilya Smirin, the Belarusian-born grandmaster who has represented Israel since 1992, has been relieved of his commentary role by the International Chess Federation after he suggested on air that the game is “maybe not for women.”
Smirin, 54, also drew criticism for praising another female player for likening positive moves made by her to those potentially made by a man during the ninth round of the Women’s Grand Prix on Tuesday in Astana, Kazakhstan.
Smirin’s initial comments were referencing Chinese player Zhu Jiner, who is a female grandmaster – a title considered lower than that of a grandmaster, which is the highest title that a male or female player can attain.
Grandmaster is reserved for players who can claim a rating or 2,500 or above, while female grandmaster requires a slightly lower score of 2,300.
Smirin’s offending comments were made during a discussion as to whether or not Zhu Jiner could develop her play to becoming a full grandmaster, during which he said: “She’s a woman grandmaster or what?… Why she wants to be like men grandmaster in this case?”
He went on to suggest that he also believes that “chess is maybe not for women.”
Fiona Steil-Antoni, his co-commentator, questioned him, saying, “You’re saying, you know, ‘chess is maybe not for women’.”
“I didn’t say it openly… in private, private conversation,” responded Smirin.
He also drew criticism for comments made about another female player, Aleksandra Goryachkin, who holds full grandmaster status – stating that she had been “playing like a man.”
“She played in Russia super final,” he added. “Small minus she made, but it was a very strong tournament. She also had like 2,600 plus rating.”
“What does that have to do with playing like a man, only men can play well?” Steil-Antoni replied.
“No, no,” Smirin said. “But she’s playing in style, positional style… But OK, I’m always curious, why can women play among men but men cannot play with women in women tournaments? Interesting question.”
Isn’t it a pure form of discrimination? How can such a man work in the official @FIDE_chess broadcast of such an important women's event? pic.twitter.com/osdI8jipab
— Gulrukhbegim Tokhirjonova (@Gulruhbegim) September 27, 2022
Gross to see such sexism in the broadcast for a women's event.
"Why does she want to be a man Grandmaster?"- Smirin ????♀️
Fiona did a great job in an uncomfortable convo she never should have been in. ???? https://t.co/bBDqwVKQv3
— Jennifer Shahade (@JenShahade) September 27, 2022
Smirin’s comments were quickly seized upon by high-profile members of the female chess community.
“Gross to see such sexism in the broadcast for a women’s event… Fiona did a great job in an uncomfortable convo she never should have been in,” said US women’s chess champion Jennifer Shahade.
Female Grandmaster Gulrukhbegim Tokhirjonova also rebuked Smirin: “Isn’t it a pure form of discrimination? How can such a man work in the official @FIDE_chess broadcast of such an important women’s event?”
Responding to the furor, FIDE – the governing body of world chess – called Smirin’s appraisal of female players “very embarrassing”.
“Although we have great respect for Grandmaster Ilya Smirin as a chess player, the views he expressed on air are completely unacceptable, offensive, and do not represent any of the values that FIDE stands for,” it said in a statement.
It also confirmed that he has been removed from his commentary duties with immediate effect.
Smirin, though, says that he is stunned by the wave of criticism he has received, claiming that he did not say anything “really bad” and objected to accusations that he is “sexist.”
“But what I said during the broadcasts was perhaps slightly impolite but nothing more,” he said to the BBC.
“And the most of it clearly was a joke. If we will continue like that, the very words ‘man’ and ‘woman’ risk to disappear rather soon. I want to stress that I did not want to hurt anyone, I love and respect chess and women. And I do not like hypocrisy.”
He added that he hopes “common sense will prevail” and he will be able to return to his commentary duties before long.
Meanwhile every single film, tv show or commercial for literally anything these days features the obligatory, sassy no-nonsense woman who-don’-need-no-man and her bumbling male costar who is usually somewhere on the spectrum between I am Sam and that time Brendan Fraser played a caveman.
They always say and do everything wrong, they always scream hysterically, they always screw everything up just badly enough for the intrepid eye-rolling sassy lady to have to swoop in and save the day!
What’s the matter, you don’t like comedy gold?!
Sexism is apparently cool and edgy and funny if it’s coming from the correct direction, but going in the opposite direction is somehow abhorrent and evil. They apply the same basic principle to casual racism.
Maybe if instead of being cancelled, the chess nerd grandpa had simply been called out (lightheartedly) with a witty retort from a cohost, no one would have really cared.
Maybe we should go back to how we were in the 90’s, where we all knew how to take a joke and gave as good as we got? God, remember how fun it was to banter and tease one another, before the crybullies infected everything? Before they made our schools and offices and work places so utterly sterile and depressing? Men and women seemed to get along better, there seemed to be far fewer racial issues etc ????????♂️
But eh, whatever… what do I know, I’m just a guy on the internet.