13.6 C
Saturday, July 20, 2024

Popular Now

Guy Hatchard
Guy Hatchardhttps://hatchardreport.com/
Guy Hatchard PhD is a statistician and former senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food safety testing and certification laboratory. Guy's book 'Your DNA Diet' is available on Amazon.com.

Guy Hatchard: The High Court of New Zealand Ducks Responsibility

High Court COVID news

A Conspiracy of Silence and a Litany of Lies

The Director General of the Danish Health Authority, who last week halted Covid-19 vaccination for under 18 year olds citing absence of any evidence of benefit, has been giving interviews. He acknowledged that the prescription of Covid vaccines for young people had been a mistake and said they never would have approved them if they had known then what they know today.

Thai study finds high levels of cardiac risk among adolescents

It is possible that the Danish Ministry of Health and other health authorities around the world including ours were aware of risks. Certainly they could have been fully aware of the dangers if they had undertaken their own appropriate investigation and made unbiased assessments early on.

study of adolescents undertaken in Thailand and published last week illustrates what could have been done.

The study examined the cardiovascular effects on 300 students aged 13 years to 18 years receiving their second Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine injection. Data being collected included demographics, symptoms, vital signs, ECG, echocardiography and cardiac enzymes. These were collected at baseline, Day 3, Day 7, and Day 14 using case record forms.

Although it is admitted that myopericarditis can be a side effect of mRNA vaccination, our Ministry of Health advised DHBs that it is rare and estimated that it may only affect 3 in every 100,000 recipients.

The Thai study found 29% (not 3 out of 100,000, but 3 out of every 10 students) registered cardiovascular effects including tachycardia, palpitation, shortness of breath, chest pain, and myopericarditis. The overt symptoms subsided within 14 days (the duration of the study). There was no follow-up of subsequent health outcomes and therefore the long term effects remain unassessed. The authors concluded that adolescents receiving mRNA vaccination should be monitored for side effects.

It is notable that this study is an assessment of cardiovascular outcomes based on objective measurements, not on subjective assessments and estimates as was primarily the case in NZ.

If such simple objective measurements had been taken early on in the vaccine rollout, it would have been normal procedure to pause the programme pending more detailed investigation of the cardiovascular effects. BUT this was never done.

There was an unjustified assumption of safety based on recommendations of safety from Pfizer itself, who stood to profit greatly from our Covid-19 mRNA vaccine rollout.

The High Court says its views cannot overrule medical decisions of the government

Yesterday (on Friday) a judgement was released by the High Court in Wellington confirming the legality of the approval process for Covid-19 children’s vaccine (aged 5-11 years). Stuff newspaper reported on the decision. Although I have not yet seen the full judgement, the quotations from it in the newspaper raise some serious questions about our legal system.

Justice David Gendall said the decisions of our Ministry of Health complied with the law and the court shouldn’t substitute its own views for the decisions of the various Ministry of Health officers and committees. These included Medsafe group manager Chris James, the Medicines Assessment Advisory Committee, a separate technical advisory group, and Dr Ashley Bloomfield, Director General of Health.

The judge acknowledged that the applicants to the court had called their own expert witnesses and submitted evidence, contrary to that submitted by the government, weighing the risks and benefits of the vaccine. BUT according to the Stuff article the judge said:

“It was not my role when reviewing the process, to decide which experts were right or form my own view on whether the paediatric vaccine should be supplied in New Zealand. Generally weighing the benefits and risks of the vaccine, and the desirability of it being available in New Zealand, were matters for Chris James as the minister’s delegate.”

The judge noted that Chris James had given his consent on conditions that included Pfizer giving further information as it became available, including periodic safety reports.

Somehow the judge failed to acknowledge that Pfizer has persistently sought in US courts to withhold such safety information (for up to 75 years). Nor did Stuff newspaper reveal whether James or the Ministry of Health had reviewed any court ordered safety information released to date.

If the study of adolescents in Thailand is anything to go by, 3 out of 10 vaccinated children in New Zealand over the age 5 may already have suffered cardiovascular problems with varying degrees of severity, and there still could be more to come.

Was the High Court judge just following legal precedent?

There is much legal case history and discussion centered around the need for the state to take responsibility for the application (or indeed withdrawal) of medical treatment for seriously ill children; if necessary against the wishes of the parents if they are found by the courts to be mistaken in their views. See for example this recent paper published just prior to the pandemic.

The accepted interpretation is that courts should adjudicate in disputed cases by weighing the evidence of risks. In the present case, the life of a seriously ill child was not at issue. The arguments were scientifically complex and moreover there was no unanimity among scientific professionals and in the published scientific literature.

Crucially the risks involved were open ended—not fully identified or quantified. This is because the long term effects of the vaccine are still unknown. Typically, vaccine safety trials take 10 years to complete. The court failed to fully take account of the fact that the risks for the children from Covid were certainly low and from the vaccine possibly high—there was an imbalance and uncertainty concerning risk.

The situation does not appear to have met the accepted justification for state intervention—serious illness of a child requiring treatment.

In summary, the court failed to address the nature of the health risks involved and avoided doing so by deferring to the government as the ultimate authority. In other words, like Pontius Pilate, the judge carefully washed his hands of the matter and left our children’s fate in the hands of the NZ government and its officers.

Did the government responsibly complete its due diligence throughout the course of the pandemic and in its dealings with Pfizer?

Simon Rae, Manager, International Science Partnerships of the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (MBIE), who vetted the vaccine supply contract with Pfizer and advised the government accordingly, wrote on 22nd March 2021 in response to an OIA request:

“We did not investigate Pfizer’s management team or its ethics as a company. We are satisfied that Pfizer has not been reckless in the development of its vaccine…we are confident that the vaccine is acceptably safe and effective…

“MBIE advised the Minister of Finance to grant an indemnity to Pfizer on the basis that doing so was in the public interest. It is not unexpected for pharmaceutical companies to seek indemnities from governments in circumstances where clinical trials are restricted, or where a purchase agreement is concluded before full trials are completed…as of 16 March 2021, MBIE is not aware of any deaths or permanent disabilities that were caused by Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.”

MBIE asserted this, despite the fact that Pfizer already had records by 28th February 2021 (prior to the MBIE statement) of more than 42,000 injuries and 1,200 deaths subsequent to its Covid vaccination.

Did our government know of these deaths and injuries but decided to believe assurances from Pfizer that they were unrelated? If so, were there any valid reasons for MoH and MBIE to assume that these serious effects post vaccination were unrelated and proceed to grant Pfizer indemnity?

If MBIE and MoH didn’t know of the deaths, why had they not sought this information from Pfizer whom they certainly knew had been collecting such post marketing data?

Why is the government along with all opposition parties unanimously behind Pfizer?

It is notable that the judge in the just announced High Court judgement acknowledged that the decision of the Medicines Assessment Advisory Committee (whose up to 12 members are anonymous) was unanimous in support of childhood vaccination. This runs parallel to the unanimous approval of government pandemic policy by all members of parliament of all parties and their refusal to meet or listen to questioning voices.

Given the paucity of evidence of benefit, the incapacity of the vaccine to stop transmission, and the high rate of adverse effects and deaths, the unanimity stands in need of explanation. BUT there has been no meaningful explanation offered except vague references to the social good of vaccines and the questionable reliability of Ministry of Health experts.

MPs have preferred to remain silent and accept the apparent assurances of the Ministry of Health that the reported 50 times greater incidence of adverse effects following Pfizer mRNA vaccination (when compared to previous vaccines) is somehow normal. In my experience such unanimous silence on the part of MPs of all parties is highly unusual.

Forgive me for paraphrasing the judgement of Justice Mahon following the Erebus disaster—this hints at a conspiracy of silence and a litany of lies. Young innocent children are being herded towards vaccination through the  minimisation of risks, misinformation, and consequent peer and societal pressures to conform to pharmaceutical medical orthodoxy.

An orthodoxy which has embraced universal applications of novel biotechnology and gene therapy without acknowledging or properly investigating the serious risks. In fact, seeking to hide such risks from public knowledge or discussion. Risks that can potentially blight young lives and persist through generations.

The Danish Ministry of Health was right to acknowledge and correct their mistakes about Covid vaccine safety for the young based on updated information. They discontinued mRNA vaccination for the under 18s. When will our Ministry do so and when will our courts recognise the overriding need for caution?

Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a food testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID). Website: HatchardReport.com.

Guy is the author of ‘Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness’.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of DTNZ.

Promoted Content

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please keep comments respectful, civil and constructive. Moderation times can vary from a few minutes to a few hours. Comments may also be scanned periodically by Artificial Intelligence to eliminate trolls and spam.


  1. Thank you Guy for your brave, truthful, highly ethical and entirely scientific article. The truth is always revealed, and those responsible for hiding and hindering it exposed.

  2. Justice David Gendall’s appalling decision does not reflect well on his competence or integrity.

    MBIE’s and MoH’s failure to undertake even the most basic due diligence is clearly beyond negligent.

    It’s astonishing that they have ‘just taken the manufacturers word for it’ given Pfizer’s well-known and very long history of serious criminal activity and criminal convictions.

    The fact that Pfizer insisted on legal indemnity should have raised huge red flags at the onset.

    Extreme naivety, extreme incompetence or extreme corruption? Is the question.


      You don’t have to wonder why? It’s not negligence, everyone in authority is compromised. MBIE, MOH, MEDSAFE, whole lot of them.

      We NZers like to think of ourselves as friendly caring lot! Laugh Out Loud. Nothing could be further from the truth. Reptiles on our midst will happily sacrifice their first born for a few pieces of silver.

      NZ, right now is nothing more than a tin pot dictatorship!

  3. Can concerned citizens do a fundme for a civil case against Chris James for failure of duty of care and/or negligence? Start going after the people refusing to talk about or acknowledge the evidence that is out there.
    Actually challenge them on the material in court.

  4. See Sue Grey’s interview with Dr. Ardis on Brighteon, revealing the snake venom ties with type 1 and 2 Diabetes, and the illegal tyranny that violates Human Rights under both New Zealand Domestic Law AND UN International Law!
    The interview is only a day or two old.
    Forget the Labour Party, the Nazional Party, ACT and the Greens; VOTERS IN NEW ZEALAND NEED TO DEPART FROM THE USUAL CHOICES OF NAZIONAL / *LABOUR (*Zio-based Socio-Communism) and VOTE FOR THE OUTDOORS AND FREEDOM PARTY!
    The other ‘minor parties’ have had plenty of time to merge and form a coalition, but this will probably never happen due to government subversions of the same, blackmailing, individual dirty laundry being held for release by intelligence agencies sharing information on potential candidates in the event that they run for office, and Operation Katipo going active during the next El-ection!
    Please see the Brighteon Video interview. Maoris and Pac Islanders also need to see this, and stop getting vaccinated!





  6. When are people going to wake up? 74% Miscarriage rate from a top fertility doctor in one of Australia’s biggest hospitals. 500 to 600% increase in heart related deaths, funeral directors and hospitals UK. 40% of woman suffering from menstrual cycle problems USA. A massive increase in still births, babies being born with weak immune systems, waning immune systems. Dr Fauci and UK government data. VAIDS, massive amount of blood clotting leading to heart, lung, brain, and spinal problems. A massive increase in cancer rates. 18% Of teens in Thailand with heart rhythm problems and 3.5% of them had blood work evidence of myocarditis. Blood work showing severe clumping of blood cells. White biostructures the embalmers are having to pull out of the jabbed. 29 thousand deaths recorded on https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data which is massively under reported. Serious adverse reactions 3452 which equals just 5% so that is 69040 people that have needed to attend hospital In NZ after taking these genocidal shots! Dr Naomi Wolf: “This 42-day study on 44 pregnant rats led them to conclude that there were ‘no effects on female fertility,’ [but the people conducting this study] were employed by and held stock in either Pfizer or BioNTech. Pfizer has been fined 2.3 billion and is currently under another 2 billion lawsuit over the Pfizer initial trial. Gene based mRNA lipid nanoparticles 13 billion they inject, they don’t stay in your deltoid they go all around your body instructing your cells to make a toxic spike protein with no off button. How many people are now disabled in the world after these shots? This is all for what they call COVID -19 but haven’t isolated SARS-COV-2 and COVID-19 is the symptoms of SARS-COV-2. They banned or restricted the treatments that have an extremely high rate of survival if used within the first three days. They are using protocols with an 80% death rate, it says they died of COVID the second reason they died is acute kidney failure USA caused by the deadly protocols. Are they using the same here? The tests are useless, extremely high false positive rates they can’t tell between live and dead matter. It mistook the common cold for flu according to a UK scientist. The Rats Test has tested positive for water, Coca Cola lemon juice. Why are they testing people with no symptoms? Why don’t people bother to look at the IFR ratings? COVID-19 similar to a flu maybe higher for people with serious prior health issues, Omicron 0.04 less than half the IFR rating of a flu. It is the injected that are creating the variants. If they make them stronger more people will die, and they will because they have weakened their immune system. Of course you could get lucky with a placebo shot or less of the toxic crap. Crimes Against Humanity! Continued in the comments. https://rumble.com/v1ecssx-from-the-hague.-international-trials-day-one-crimes-against-humanity.html Masks don’t work for a virus and neither do these toxic shots, you only have to look at the data. Injections do nothing to stop transmission or stop you getting very sick or dying, the most the jab does for a short period of time is give you protection from mild to moderate flu like symptoms. You are doing all of this for a 0.08% reduced chance of getting COVID-19 according to the Lancet journal, it does nothing to stop transmission. It does not stop you getting seriously sick or dying. The most this does is protect you from mild to moderate flu like symptoms. Organ failure caused by the body attacking it self, Germany pathologist This causes all sorts of autoimmune diseases. Todd Callender believes the lipid nano particles are carrying Hemorrhagic fever Marburg ,Ebola and are dormant. If there is graphene inside that could explode by pulsating 5G for1 minute releasing the deadly contents into the body. Isn’t money pox just the jab injured?


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here




Daily Life


moderate rain
11.9 ° C
12.3 °
10.6 °
94 %
100 %
12 °
12 °
10 °
11 °
11 °