13.3 C
Monday, July 15, 2024

Popular Now

NZDSOS: Will you buy the bivalent lemon?

Bivalent COVID vaccine news

New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out With Science (NZDSOS) responds to Helen Petousis Harris’ interview wih Corin Dann to discuss the latest mRNA technology injection that purportedly prevents you from getting Omicron.

They are wheeling out the old guns to advertise the new Bivalent booster against Omicron.

Dr Petousis-Harris went on record with Guyon Espiner late last year saying that the data did not support having a further booster herself, and she wouldn’t be rushing out to get one.

We quote:

Guyon: “Just to drive that home, you’re triple vaxxed right, and you’ve had Omicron. You’re not going to get a fourth, cos that’s the same position I’m in?
Helen P-H: “Right, so I’m not looking for a fourth. I don’t see any evidence to suggest it’s going to benefit me really.”

Perhaps scolded by her paymasters at the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) commercial arm, the Global Alliance on Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI), now she is back, sounding muddled and still unconvinced. But hey, the babies are now getting the shots, so all good, right?

Why was there no discussion around natural immunity? Thankfully this memory-holed concept is now returning to fashion, and NZDSOS shared an analysis on the latest update on natural immunity from The Lancet waking back to the obvious here.

A spokesperson for NZDSOS states: “Up to this point doctors have not been allowed to consider the risks and benefits in an individual person. The injection has been rolled out assuming everyone is at equal and high risk which simply has not been the case.

Increased risk is highly correlated with increasing age, but there are still cautions in place for administering the injection to the frail elderly. A one-size-fits-all recommendation is contrary to previous medical practice where a patient would have an informed consent discussion with a trusted health professional and without the government, incentives or threats in the room”.

The Bivalent booster is available to certain people in society, and NZDSOS asks why the change of heart for under 30’s?

There is no new miracle data. The Bivalent product was tested on 8 mice – slides 25/26. NZDSOS questions if there is a magic increased risk beginning at 31. “Why not 50, or 60 or 70? The epidemiology actually shows that there is a huge rise in all-cause mortality in injected populations around the world in the 25 to 49 year age group, up 84% according to the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) in the United States. Deaths from covid do not account for this”, questioned the spokesperson.

“NZDSOS is frequently told by the consciously unvaccinated that they feel reassured of having made the right decision.”

“Most will have been infected, recovered well and now have robust natural immunity. They do not need a damaging “vaccine” in addition to that, and there are horrifying signs, and demonstrated biological mechanisms, of compromised immunity to other infections and cancer – all for the price of “hybrid immunity” to a flu-like respiratory virus”, said the spokesperson.

Kiwis are beginning to understand, if you need five or more doses of mRNA technology and even then are not protected against infection, transmission or hospitalisation; and the intervention actually increases your mortality, then we are being sold a lemon. In fact, we being coerced to take the lemon.

“Not only is this is a huge waste of taxpayers’ money, but very sadly the mRNA injection has cost the lives of some New Zealanders and disabled many others while offering only trivial and short-lived protection against a mild viral illness”, said the spokesperson.

Image credit: Lukas

Promoted Content

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please keep comments respectful, civil and constructive. Moderation times can vary from a few minutes to a few hours. Comments may also be scanned periodically by Artificial Intelligence to eliminate trolls and spam.


  1. The line being pushed now is centred on the Wuhan virus Lab leak
    Because if there was a leak the virus must exist – right?
    There is no virus because none has ever been isolated separated nor identified
    Therefore never having been proven to exist
    Which is why the virus and it’s so called variants are computer construct models
    The truth is in fact we don’t even know if virus exist because it has never been proven
    Which are most likely connected to the bodies natural processes involving detoxification
    So called variants are simply sickness and symptoms attributable to fake vaccines
    Which if there is no virus are completely unnecessary
    And which attack and destroy the bloods white blood cells natural immune system
    Making those who have been ‘vaccinated’ more susceptible to injury and death
    And including the common cold
    So called covid is symptoms of rebranded influenza
    Follow the science
    What is going on is absolutely diabolical especially when it involves children

  2. Best choice I ever made. Zero regrets. Zero.

    Ive enjoyed watching the fake news twits bend over backwards trying to sell “COVID CAUSED YOUR CHEST PAIN” to the poor genetic mutants watching at home. I wonder how long they can keep it up 🤔

    • Well, Josef Goebbels told the European populations over and over the lies of Nazism, until, as he put it “Tell the lie often enough, and people will believe it!” In other words, BRAINWASHING!
      This is why when you see the TV, it’s called ‘programming’…
      Govern=control, (ie spped control governor on an engine
      Ment=mental (mind & brain)
      ‘Programming’ = a set specific that is absorbed from a ‘Broad-cast’, broadcast being the throwing out into the populations a specific set of ideas and thoughts that will ‘germinate’ and give rise to a ‘growing idealation’.
      It has worked quite well for the CIA, the Zionists, and the bloody enforcement by the Red Terror that murdered 65 million Russians, just as J3w Zelensky has been doing to to the ethnic Russians for 10 years.
      & now they’re tampering with the food via genetic engineering, destroying crops and processing plants, and making food unaffordable for us ‘useless eaters’ and ‘bogan bottom-feeders’!
      That’s OK- we’ll just go to THEIR homes and take THEIR organic food supplies that haven’t been tainted by mRNA!
      After all, in the end, we can do what we want because THEIRsemi-auto MSSA’s were outlawed 2 years ago by the communist in the current government, so they will have little defence when the hungry crowds pop in to THEIR neighbourhoods…!
      CHOMP! Mmmmmm…goood!

  3. No I will not buy the bivalent lemon and no I will not be supporting Hamilton Cities 20 minute city.
    The latter will be the execution of freedom in New Zealand. The ‘irrelevant’ masses will love the concept.

  4. The Nuremburg Convention appears to have been flouted too. Govt’s have responsibility for carrying out their duties of care. Threatening Doctors who do not follow a tyrannical WHO line is not proper. How can I trust my GP if she recommends any medicinal in the future? The govt have sloppily ruined the trustworthyness of the whole of the former trustworthy profession.
    I didn’t like flu jabs as they caused greater reactions then the regular flu. With Fauci and other influencers, including a flouncy PM Promoting it my trust barrier could not be broken. My GP classified me as mildly demented–that’s only a small step away from gulags. Having been a Public Servant and a forensic investigator I well knew the boundaries wheich were being broken

  5. Right from the very beginning of this alleged pandemic and experimental gene therapeutic rollout, the clinical trial inconsistencies were being pointed out. I submitted numerous Pfizer clinical trial documents to NZ Media council at that time after witnessing numerous NZ media lies. Without a proven reduction in actual infection there can be absolutely no claim of real world “efficacy”

    The reality was the RIR was actually a figure of “0” (zero%) as the Pfizer vaccine fails to stop both infection & transmission.

    As I inferred in my official complaint at that time the “initial” findings during the Pfizer trials on “efficacy” were based on only 169 placebo participants vs 9 vaccinated participants who were found to be infected (RT-PCR test positive only) to gain the ‘initial’ claim of “95% efficacy” (Page 24, Pfizer-COVID-19 Vaccine EUA review memo_508ed). This finding was based solely on 7days post second dose. As I also stated in my initial complaint, as the efficacy during the trials POST 7days second dose became less noteworthy Pfizer stopped PCR testing the vaccinated groups once RT-PCR positive placebo & vaccinated participants reached a close to similar outcome.

    Page 41: (Pfizer-COVID-19 Vaccine EUA review memo_508ed)

    “Among 3,410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1,594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group. Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group. It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days postvaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19. Overall though, these data do not raise a concern that protocol-specified reporting of suspected, but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases could have masked clinically significant adverse events that would not have otherwise been detected.”

    My claim was the actual observable RIR (reduction in infection risk) as shown in the trials at this point which was .862%
    Placebo .910% – PFE Vaccine .048%

    “95% efficacy” was only based on 9 vaccinated participants out of 18,708 found to have a positive RT-PCR result. But this must be balanced against the placebo group to determine actual reduction in infection risk (RIR) Placebo group results were 169 out of 18,559 had a positive RT-PCR result.

    In the FDA Briefing Document: Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting September 17, 2021

    Page 22: “An additional analysis appears to indicate that incidence of COVID-19 generally increased in each group of study participants with increasing time post-Dose 2 at the start of the analysis period. Only 3 severe COVID-19 cases were reported during the analysis period, all of which occurred among study participants originally randomized to BNT162b2.”

    In addition, it is well known via numerous OIA’s to the Ministry of Health that the Pfizer clinical trail outcomes were never aimed at stopping the risk of “transmission” of Covid-19.

    True “vaccines” by definition not only reduce/stop transmission but also infection. This virology “definition” was subsequently changed by the CDC/WHO in 2020 to encompass mRNA experimental (never used in humans prior to this point) technology which has been claimed to only ‘reduce symptoms’ via a gene based therapeutic spike protein produced immune response.

  6. Wow! Tested on 8 mice.

    These FDA ‘regulators’ are out of control. They are undeniably unethical, corrupt, captured, immoral and extremely dangerous.

  7. Follow the money: the corrupt networking of GAVI, CEPI, Malaghan Institute NZ and other ‘usual suspects’.

    Here is a document that was compiled by a German IT specialist after months-long research into financial network connections using state-of-the-art software. This document, in English, is base for a video, which is available only in German,.so far: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iA–zyoA6Mc
    The document, a 169 page PDF file, illustrates the network connections between the Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, WHO, GAVI and other NGOs and Big Pharma. It contains 6500 objects including Persons, NGOs, Companies, Documents, etc. It also includes more than 7200 links between them. All information is verifiable, publicly referenced and publicly available:
    IMHO it is a BOMBSHELL.
    It shows corrupt connections of FUNDING, politics, academia and health authorities, connections never before connected in one flow-chart. It even states the money amounts of “funding”.
    The two following links were found using that document. They show how international Big Money corrupts NZ policies: the example is the CEPI institute.
    The 169 page document is a treasure trove for any investigative journalist.

      • Delay glitches? So the greatest interest in any article including feedback/commentary is on day of release, not days later.
        Almost like when politicians release critical data late on a friday or first night of a public holiday.

        • dont be grumpy, the editor is on well earned holliday You should know it if you have read his article( opinion) about viet nam. Excellent article by the way. And not prejuduced as msm

  8. At this point we just need to very heavily encourage the moronic politicians and their unthinking brainless NPC bureaucrats to keep on getting injected with their ‘safe and effective’ covid ‘boosters.

    Easy as.

    • Problem is none of them or their families are injected. They know it’s poison. Ever heard a politician getting side effects of the jab? Nope! They have exempted themselves.

      • I think there maybe some that did not get the memo, and perhaps getting a might bit ticked off because they fell for the scam………mmm


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here




Daily Life


light rain
11.5 ° C
11.8 °
10.6 °
75 %
100 %
12 °
13 °
12 °
12 °
14 °