Yesterday the government announced changes to the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the COVID-19 Response.
In a press release yesterday, Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden said the Government wanted feedback on the inclusion of the following topics, ‘as part of its commitment to expanding the scope of the inquiry’:
- Use of multiple lockdowns
- Vaccine procurement and efficacy
- The social and economic impacts on both regional and national levels
- Whether the decisions made, and steps taken, were justified
- The cost-effectiveness of the Government’s policies, and whether the rules set by the Government appropriately balanced COVID-19 elimination with other goals
- The Government’s utilisation of partnerships with business and professional groups
- The extent of disruption to New Zealanders’ health, education, and business as a result of the Government’s policies
- If the Government’s response was consistent with the rule of law
- How New Zealand’s pandemic preparedness compared to other countries
The announcement was criticised in some quarters for failing to include the topic of ‘vaccine safety’ in light of the unprecedented number of adverse events from the mRNA gene therapy, and the growing scientific opinion that the current trend of high excess deaths rates in highly vaccinated countries including New Zealand, is linked to it.
Independent media outlet Counterspin called the announcement a joke, for failing to address that important issue, along with others such as release of the full unredacted contract with Pfizer, tweeting on X:
NZ FIRST ROYAL COMMISSION OF ENQUIRY ‘TERMS OF REFERENCE’ MISSING KEY TERMS
Counterspin Media called it prior to the election. As expected, the NZF terms of reference omit the key components required for a ‘far reaching’ and ‘wide scope’ enquiry.
Where is the specific Jab harm…
— COUNTERSPIN MEDIA NZ (@COUNTERSPIN111) February 2, 2024
Tauranga lawyer Kirsten Murfitt urged Kiwis to make use of the submissions process to tell the government to include the issue of vaccine safety in the expanded terms of reference.
Van Velden said the submissions process was an opportunity for New Zealanders to ‘share their experiences on the pandemic.’
Submissions can be made from 8 February, and the process for doing so would be announced ‘soon’ by the Royal Commission, said van Velden.
Yesterday, the Internal Affairs Minister, Brooke van Velden, announced the changes to the CV19 inquiry. NZ First had wanted a new independent inquiry. Act wanted to expand the terms of reference of the existing Royal Commission. The coalition has settled on expanding the terms of… https://t.co/yUv4OjrVyk
— Kirsten Murfitt (@MurfittTauranga) February 2, 2024
The government, to be credible, MUST MUST MUST invite the public to comment on whether or not it was and is SAFE. If not, WHY THE OMISSION?
AND it would be beneficial to have a change of staff running the INquiry. The ones there were put there by the previous government whose watch it was when the experimental jabs were forced on Kiwis.
It was an election promise by NZF yet ACT has made the first public announcement on the issue and they left out `Safety` which was the main issue of the freedom movement and the main reason why this government won in October, this does not look like the Govt is completely onboard, I also predict that Labour and the Left don’t make an issue of this.
We need to get independent expert witness’s
Like Steve Kirsch Sam – Mark Bailey Guy Hatchard Andrew Kaufman Barry Young others
And not paid off govt crisis actors come shills like Michael Baker and Siouxsie Wiles
Who are uncompromised professionals to date who have been kept on a leash muzzled ostracized discredited threatened and demonized amidst govt sponsored fake news media narrative
The people who made this crime possible and who are continuing to keep it moving forward
Why were 11,500 health workers exempt from the experimental vaccine mandate when the rest of the country was forced to comply?
We already know the jab was completely ineffective.
Obviously the most important issue is jab safety and proper recognition and help for the thousands of seriously jab injured New Zealanders.
We know there was no need for what is deemed the vaccine
Because there was and is no virus
What were the PCR Tests supposed to be diagnosing?
Nothing
What was the reason for the lockdowns loss off jobs lives destroyed vaccine attributed injuries and deaths?
Absolutely nothing
Just following orders
Ardern was warned but was hellbent on following the orders of ‘her’ WEF WHO masters
Their darling poster pin up girl icon of takeover control and oppression
Heads need to roll
Also why Ashley Bloomfield refused exemptions to people badly injured by their first jab.
A disgraceful act of appalling malfeasance which should result in criminal prosecution.
ACT is front footing the Covid Inquiry and has left out Vaccine Safety? Where is Winston on this or is NZF distancing itself ????? the defiantly looks like a 1 term government.