24 C
Wednesday, February 28, 2024
HomeNewsRNZ threatens to leave Twitter after being slapped with 'Government-funded media' label

Popular Now

RNZ threatens to leave Twitter after being slapped with ‘Government-funded media’ label

Megan Whelan, RNZ’s Head of Content, claimed the state-funded broadcaster had an ‘independent’ editorial policy.

Whelan made the threat to leave the Twitter yesterday afternoon.

In a three-part she wrote:

‘RNZ’s editorial independence is enshrined in our charter and editorial policy. Twitter’s own policy defines government-funded media as cases where the government may have ‘may have varying degrees of government involvement over editorial content’, which does not apply to RNZ.

‘Not only is our editorial independence protected by the law, we guard it vigorously. Over the next few days we will be considering our options.

‘Including talking to Twitter to have the label removed or revised, or as other public media around the world have done, leave the platform.

Megan Whelan – RNZ’ Head of Content.’

Twitter’s definition of ‘Government-funded media’ states:

‘Government-funded media is defined as outlets where the government provides some or all of the outlet’s funding and may have varying degrees of government involvement over editorial content.’

Earlier this month RNZ announced an annual boost in government funding of $25.7 million as part of a larger $117.8 million compensation package over four years following the scrapped public media merger. This is in addition to the millions the entity received from the Public Interest Journalism Fund (PIJF).

Commenters were quick to point out that RNZ was clearly within the meaning of Twitter’s definition. There were two elements to it – government funding in whole or in part, and varying degrees of government involvement over editorial content.

As to the second element users noted how RNZ’s narratives, especially those relating to COVID vaccines, trans rights and the Posie Parker #letwomenspeak rally were closely aligned to those of the government, as well as the broadcaster’s lack of right-of-centre view points and opinions. As part of its PIJF funding, RNZ is required to ensure all content, where appropriate, ‘actively promotes the principles of partnership and Active Protection under Te Tiriti O Waitangi acknowledging Maori as Tiriti partner…’. Such a requirement was also proof, commenters said, of government editorial control.

As of today Whelan’s tweets has received hundreds of replies, with the overwhelming number in support of Twitter’s label, and some calling for it to be applied to all legacy media outlets that receive money from the government.

Promoted Content

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please keep comments respectful, civil and constructive. Moderation times can vary from a few minutes to a few hours. Comments may also be scanned periodically by Artificial Intelligence to eliminate trolls and spam.


  1. Oh please do leave Twitter Megan, it’s only for truthful reporting. I mean who wants to read squeaky clean propaganda for the government to nudge people where they want them. Missing you already 😂

  2. Goodbye RNZ. Looked exactly like government propaganda coming from the midst of RNZ when covid was being promoted and the funding issue speaks volumes. I haven’t paid RNZ any attention for a long while now

  3. Media companies like RNZ who took huge sums of cash from the government and then failed the public to report on the medical harms from the vaccine should be labelled. Now that might be embarrassing to them. But if they would like to remove themselves from Twitter that works for me. The destruction of independence and hiding government wrongdoings is repugnant. RNZ is nothing more than state-sponsored propaganda.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here



broken clouds
17.5 ° C
18.9 °
15.6 °
82 %
75 %
17 °
17 °
18 °
18 °
19 °
-- Free Ads --spot_img