Washington barred scientists from its laboratories manipulating SARS-CoV-like viruses, the prestigious medical journal claimed.
The US has prevented independent research into the origins of the Covid-19 virus, a report by the Lancet Commission has asserted.
Washington barred the researchers from accessing relevant laboratories and refused to disclose full information on American studies of the virus, the document, published in the British medical journal on Wednesday, outlined.
“Independent researchers have not yet investigated the US laboratories engaged in the laboratory manipulation of SARS-CoV-like viruses,” the report said while discussing the potential origins of the Covid-19 infection. Nor had they gained access to the research conducted at the Wuhan laboratory, which has been considered a possible place where the disease might have originated, the document added.
The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) also “resisted disclosing the details” of the research conducted in America on SARS-CoV-related viruses, which the US government agency has been supporting, according to the report. Eventually, only an “extensively redacted” version of the relevant data was provided, the document said, adding that it contains only as much information that was required by the Freedom of Information act lawsuits.
The lack of the needed data on the virus origins still prevents the researchers from determining the origin of the virus, the paper admits, adding that virtually any hypothesis in this field remains plausible. In particular, it said that “two main possible pathways” of its emergence should still be considered: a natural spillover event, in which a person contracted it from an animal, and a “research-related” incident.
The second pathway particularly suggests that a researcher could have become “infected in the field or in the laboratory with a natural virus, or … in the laboratory with a genetically manipulated virus,” the document said.
“The search for the origins of the virus requires unbiased, independent, transparent, and rigorous work … supported by all governments,” the report noted. Washington has so far not commented on the Lancet Commission findings.
The exact origins of the Covid-19 virus have yet to be conclusively proven. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) stated in February 2021 that it was most likely transmitted from an animal, possibly a bat, to humans.
Earlier in September, an Israeli study concluded that bats are likely not to blame for the Covid-19 pandemic since there is no compelling evidence proving a link between bats and the disease outbreak.
There is no “conspiracy theory”. This bioweapon, called Covid, is sponsored by US, and US labs created it, and pushed the last stage from Wuhan. Globalists deep state is just trialling and more will be unleashed in future.
John Cambell’s review https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d0hpT00a8xg
Kirsten Murfitt – Open Letter To Members Of Parliament (Part 3)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2YHTiovT6Q1R/
The letter
https://www.docdroid.net/XhkeZ0H/open-letter-to-parliament-22722-pdf
My thoughts in a nutshell.
Regarding the damage which is ongoing and in the case of those impacted by the mandates and the experimental Pfizer injections, one cannot sweep this egregious abuse of human and medical rights under the carpet.
Anyone who listened to Rodney Hide’s show yesterday, will appreciate why there must be a Royal Commission of Inquiry sooner, not later and in the interim, a credible and independent committee established, in order to ensure that anyone injured or any family who has lost a loved one, temporally related to the Pfizer product, is offered due diligence and an effective duty of care, in a timely manner.
The Autopsy processes and Coronial Inquiry system needs to be transparent. The Coroners Office is currently not subject to the NZOIA or the Ombudsman Act. Why, you might ask?
The CARM and ACC systems which are meant to be effective, but which are not fit for purpose, imho, must be reviewed along with the farcical Medsafe authority and the OIA system.
The NZ Health and Disability Codes must be revisited, if for no other reason than to remind all health professionals of their responsibilities, who may have been complicit in the abuses of power, the abrogation of patient and consumer rights and the circumvention of the process of Informed Consent.
We must remember the moral and ethical imperatives in respect to the Hippocratic Oath, the Nurses’ Pledge and the accompanying professional codes of conduct, standards and protocols, which pertain to Consent and medical procedures, all of which are relevant when injecting a drug, which is a medical procedure.
All parties must be required to explain and be accountable for the outcomes, which have impacted countless citizens lives and well being. If this was about ‘health,’ then something has gone terribly wrong, has it not?
The ongoing medical sequelae for those injured must be acknowledged and every effort made to find solutions, employing up to date diagnostics and effective and enduring treatments. There must be compensation for them now and if applicable, into the future. Given the ongoing Pfizer studies outlined in the EMA RMP, last updated February 2022, that would be reasonable, given that no evidence of moderate or long term safety was known when Medsafe provided a Provisional Consent and they knew there was no moderate or long or term evidence.
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/rmp-summary/comirnaty-epar-risk-management-plan_en.pdf
Here is an example from the 195 page long document, which Medsafe was and still is cogniscent of…
Page 155…
The EMA Risk Management Plan also Pfizer Study C4591036, the purpose of which is “To characterize the clinical course, risk factors, long-term sequelae, and quality of life in children and young adults <21 years with acute post-vaccine myocarditis”.
Completion date October 31st 2025.
Those who have lost their jobs and livelihoods through mandates and those who may continue to be discriminated against, via the current Governmental ‘off hands’ approach, which allows employers to continue the Government’s dirty work, must be protected and/or offered their jobs back, with compensation for income lost and psychological distress.
It goes without saying, that the Government must apologise publicly and this would include addressing those impacted by denial of Exemptions. Primum Non Nocere, Dr Ashely Bloomfield?
Who would be the person to oversee such an enormous act of justice and accountability?
I would suggest Dame Silvia Cartwright.
To all those who have kept their heads in the sandpit, or who were cogniscent of the truth and ignored it, remember this…
“You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again, that you did not know.”
(William Wilberforce)