An update from the Covid Royal Commission of Inquiry.
This week my closest friend and colleague from university days passed away from cancer. It came on very suddenly with no time to say goodbye or offer support. Although we both agreed about the lab origin of Covid because of our mutual connections with the biotechnology research community, unfortunately we had differed in our attitude to the Covid vaccine. My friend trusted his doctor’s advice.
The effects of gene editing cannot be contained, any mistakes can spread without limit and persist through generations. Nothing highlights this more than the very long tail of the pandemic. Highly vaccinated countries are still suffering elevated rates of excess deaths and record levels of hospitalisation years later. The BBC reported in March for example: “Sick people leaving workforce at record highs“.
When I spoke about my friend’s death to an acquaintance working for the health service, they mentioned their friend and others who had similarly passed away unexpectedly and too soon. They asked me “Had I heard of the term sniper alley?”, and explained that it is as if we are all in a narrow alleyway being shot at from a hidden location. You never know who will be hit next.
Mainstream media is full of tragic cases these days. This article in the New Zealand Herald entitled “Bowel cancer rates rising among New Zealanders under 50 years old, driving calls for even lower screening age” is typical. The article reports a study showing that rate of early-onset bowel cancer increased steadily in New Zealand between 2000 and 2020. In other words, in common with many western countries, more people under the age 50 are tragically being diagnosed with bowel cancer. The rate had been increasing by 2.3% per year
The study covers the twenty year period prior to the pandemic, so why am I writing about it? One of the authors of the study Professor Frank Frizzle revealed to the Herald that the rate of increase has suddenly accelerated beyond the study period into 2022. He also said that little is known about what is driving the increase here and overseas. This is particularly concerning since young people are smoking less and eating less meat, previously identified risk factors for bowel cancer.
If Frizzle is looking for obvious causes of the long term pre-pandemic trend, he might investigate a recent article from the Brownstone Institute entitled “Prescription Drugs Are the Leading Cause of Death” or he might read this very recent study entitled “Exposure to pesticides and risk of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis” which found an association between insecticide and herbicide exposure and colorectal cancer.
However, neither of these possible risk factors have suddenly accelerated in 2022, so why have the rates of bowel cancer been accelerating recently in New Zealand? We don’t know because publicly available Health Service cancer data only goes to the end of 2021. In fact we don’t know why our hospitals are overcrowded. We don’t know which specific disease rates are higher. Apparently Professor Frizzle has more up to date information but we don’t. The public is left with gossip from inside the medical profession that we are now living in sniper alley, tragic tales in mainstream media and heart-rending personal anecdotes like mine and yours.
For the record, a study of cancer mortality in Japan was published in the journal Cureus in April entitled “Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan”. The study found that following vaccination with a third mRNA vaccine dose in 2022, researchers observed “significant excess mortalities” for all cancers.
Well, you might think, we have an ongoing public inquiry into the Covid-19 pandemic taking place here in New Zealand, surely that is going to take note of overseas research findings and answer our questions? Short answer: Not likely based on present evidence. Professor Tony Blakely, Chairman of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Covid Response issued a public statement on 7th May summarising progress so far with the move to revise its terms of reference. He managed all 900 words without once mentioning Covid vaccine injury.
Blakely identified ‘vaccine effectiveness’ as a topic that might be included in the inquiry, but despite receiving a petition containing over 35,000 signatures expressing concern about vaccine safety, these risks are not mentioned once in his progress report. Professor Blakely seems determined to keep mum and continue to swim against the tide of concern. Despite being an epidemiologist, Prof. Blakely doesn’t mention what has been described elsewhere as the baffling association between excess mortality and Covid vaccination rates. Is he the right man for the job? You tell me.
The New Zealand Herald reprinted an article from the UK Daily Telegraph on Wednesday entitled “AstraZeneca withdraws Covid vaccine, months after admitting rare side effect“. Let’s have more honesty like this. The article preamble notes that 9087 doses of the vaccine were administered in New Zealand with 319 recipients reporting adverse effects. In the UK it is officially linked with at least 81 deaths. 50 injured recipients are currently engaged in class action against the company. These figures are likely to be the tip of the iceberg.
In New Zealand the predominant vaccine has been the mRNA Pfizer Covid vaccine. 65,000 adverse effects have been reported to Medsafe and Pfizer has admitted that there are side effects including myocarditis, a form of heart disease. A prospective study in Thailand found measurable cardiovascular effects in a staggering 29% of subjects receiving the Pfizer vaccine, but this Covid vaccine has not been withdrawn (review more links here). It is still being promoted here as ‘safe and effective’. NZ remains stuck in the Covid dark ages.
Image credit: Mufid Majnun
Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food testing and safety company (now known as FoodChain ID). You can subscribe to his websites HatchardReport.com and GLOBE.GLOBAL for regular updates by email.
He is the author of ‘Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness’.
A great article thanks Guy. I too have sadly lost two friends to aggressive Cancer over a six month period aged 57 and 61…one was diagnosed 3 months and the other five months prior to their premature demise. Both were healthy individuals prior to their diagnosis.
I have noticed during the past three years, significant changes to diagnostic testing and reporting in New Zealand, specifically relating to Immunology. Is there something bigger going on behind the scenes?
A relative was diagnosed with Thrombocytopenia (a well known side effect of Pfizer vaccine) post receipt of Covid vaccine. A flow cytometry test (that provides a rapid means to identify an immunological defect at a relatively low cost) was requested via a Specialist but was ‘declined’ by the lab. This was not re-requested. The reporting of serum Electrophoresis reporting also changed during 2020. Sadly the patient now has chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. So why has it now taken over 3 years to uncover this and would this scenario be considered an opportunistic diagnostic finding?
Additionally, a privately paid request for an IgG subclass test was also declined by the Lab for another patient.
Another patient had a wound infection whereby a swab was taken under ‘Specialist’ request to establish the bug to enable the use of the correct antibiotic. The test was ‘declined ‘ due to insufficient clinical information on the request form. This patient is immune-suppressed and is inherently high risk for infection.
I am beginning to question whether the ‘decline rates’ of requested pathology testing is further contributing level of excessive death in New Zealand.
This would be an interesting study to research further.
Someone I’ve known for a very long time died a month Go approx. He had bowel cancer and was just 60 years old.
It would be easy to look at other reasons for this but it begs the question. But you can’t ask it would be the height of insensitivity. If you were very blunt and direct I suppose.
I absolutely agree regarding ‘begs the question’. Surely medically our Health entities know what tests were completed, what medical classifications the patients had prior to vaccination and whether Immunologically there is an issue post vaccination and link to cancer.
These issues need a deep dive as many patients in their 40’s to 70’s have had a myriad of tests in comparison to the younger groups. Is there a pattern emerging to explain the excessive case numbers In New Zealand?
There are many, many families aggrieved by the premature loss of their loved family members…so many questions are in need of sound research and appropriate response.
Another very pertinent article highlighting NZs leadership’s woeful response and gaslighting to the harm caused to the NZ public – thanks Guy!
Excellent article but try telling the complacent old NZ public. Their apathetic attitude is a big part of the reason they have been able , thus far, to get away with this…..
There’s no evidence Chlormequat causes cancer, but would avoid wheat and oat products until tested.
Unfortunately NZ is infested with feeble-minded communist idiots.
We just need to encourage them to be injected as often as possible with ‘safe and effective’ MRNA vaccinations.
Problem solved within 10/20 years.
Imagine being stupid enough to be injected with MRNA ‘vaccinations’.
Sadly the indoctrinated morons can’t be helped.
Morons, yes! I work with almost an entire company of them (with a few very notable exceptions). And it’s not only this topic, it’s the human carbon emissions climate hoax and a raft of others. In fact, the vast majority still think that 911 was orchestrated from a cave in Afghanistan.
I call them NPCs, but morons is just as accurate.