14.3 C
Monday, April 15, 2024

Popular Now

Guy Hatchard
Guy Hatchardhttps://hatchardreport.com/
Guy Hatchard PhD is a statistician and former senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food safety testing and certification laboratory. Guy's book 'Your DNA Diet' is available on Amazon.com.

Do the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines degrade higher human functions?

I find myself perplexed that commercial pharmaceutical enterprises, despite huge areas of uncertainty around safety and outcomes, felt that they could launch their experimental mRNA vaccines on the world’s population.

I am also confused how public health officials, the medical profession, and politicians became cheerleaders, even when a significant number of highly qualified scientists were waving red flags. Worse, when the accumulating adverse effects and deaths, and the ineffectiveness of the Covid vaccines to stop transmission became very obvious, why was there no precautionary pause to take stock? Nor was there any expression of regret, sympathy or remorse from our politicians. The opposite in fact, politicians all over the world doubled down with vaccine passes, mass sackings, and progressed to water cannons and rubber bullets.

COVID-19 vaccines news

At this point in time, the weight of research points unequivocally to the lack of effectiveness of mRNA vaccines and the continuing risks of adverse effects. See for example a 14 February 2022 report by the Israeli Ministry of Health, (translation linked here).

Some statisticians now appraise vaccine injury as worse than Covid itself. No one but a mad person would be continuing to recommend these risky and short lived vaccines for a mild disease and punishing those who refuse. The more so because the long term effects of the mRNA vaccine continue to be unresearched. It seems we have many mad people in our midst.

Can mRNA vaccines alter intelligence?

It is genuinely shocking how apparently sane caring health professionals ignore research findings, and how politicians refuse to meet and discuss concerns with constituents. I am asking myself is there any valid reason to suppose that receiving an mRNA vaccine degrades decision-making, ethical, or empathetic capacity? This is not an ad hominem attack. I fully realise I am going to be heavily criticised and even crucified for asking this question, but I believe it is a valid scientific question to ask. It may not be scientifically fashionable, or to some acceptable, to ask questions about the relationship between mind and body, consciousness and matter, but any answers could point to exit strategies from the current pointless and destructive confrontation.

Many of you will be aware of recently published research from Sweden which found that genetic sequences from mRNA vaccines can integrate into liver cells in vitro.

This study builds upon earlier research and indicates pathways for genetic interference to be caused by Covid vaccines. For example, it presents a possible mechanism to explain the cases of autoimmune liver disease observed after Covid-19 vaccination. I don’t personally have sufficient technical genetic and microbiological knowledge to explain the full import of this study, but various highly qualified experts have tackled this on YouTube and other platforms. For example:

You will gain from this video an insight into just how little we do understand about the possible side effects of mRNA vaccines and how the risks are being casually dismissed, despite the obvious lack of knowledge about their extent and long term prognosis.

Consciousness and DNA

Importantly, no one understands the relationship between higher human functions and genetics. The known integrative role consciousness plays in physics, biology, and all phases of life has been ignored for over a century in favour of a generally mechanistic or reductionist view of life and the universe. It is no longer plausible or realistic to overlook the key role of consciousness. It is time to re-interpret experimental results and theoretical models.

It is inconceivable that the DNA molecule is not connected with consciousness. DNA lies at the centre of the cell. Without losing its structure or integrity it succeeds in producing and directing the frantic activity of millions of proteins and other cellular components rushing about within the cell membrane. The system the DNA has set up and controls is capable of ensuring that damage to itself is more or less instantly repaired after the countless collisions and oxidative damage it endures. It also directs the specialisation of individual cells to undertake billions of individual tasks within the human body. Liver cells, nerve cells, brain cells, kidney cells, reproductive cells, lung cells, heart cells, and so on. It is without doubt that the DNA must do so in constant communication with trillions of other DNA molecules in other cells. DNA is at the heart of a network or field of intelligence that has the hallmark of consciousness—intelligent, self-referral functioning.

It is now well known that cells have memory. Transplant recipients, especially heart recipients, can acquire the memories and behaviours of their donors. A refined vegetarian concert pianist may suddenly become interested in eating hamburgers and rushing about on motorcycles, if these interests coincide with those of their heart donor (JOSHI, S. Memory transference in organ transplant recipients, Namah Journal 19(1) 2011). These changes can extend in some cases to deeper personality changes. It is also well known that cells make intelligent decisions quite independently of any commands from the brain. Decisions that are not just automatically programmed, but are apparently novel responses to unusual threats. These responses point to a net of consciousness at work with individual cells as communication nodes of the network.

New nodes inserted into the cell network integrate with the total functioning of the organism and change the behaviour of the network.

Yet this is more than a network of individual elements in communication. The human individual—physiology, biology, neurology, psychology—is an integrated entity in its own right functioning as a WHOLE. The whole is more than the sum of its parts. The hallmark of this holistic entity is functioning intelligent consciousness. There is a reciprocal relationship of mutual interaction between the consciousness of the cell and the consciousness of the individual. Every cell influences the holistic value of the individual, and is in turn influenced by the holistic value of consciousness. Every cell instantly responds to the consciousness of the individual and feeds back information and responses to the holistic consciousness of the individual. We instantly register even the smallest pin prick.

The relationship between genes and intelligence remains unexplored

It is not beyond rational thought to propose that if genetic sequences integrate into many cellular components of the physiology, they may influence mental states. A wide scale disruption of DNA could be a result of mRNA vaccination, it has already been proposed by some as a possibility. This might be analogous to the effect of the MCAS software enhancement on the Boeing 737 Max. This was sufficient to override the stability of a complex but long-standing plane design. No one expected the system to fail but it did. No one really understands how higher human functions like assessments of fairness emerge, nor how they might be altered.

We understand that animals do not have the same refined reflective, nuanced, moral judgement that we have, they are largely instinctual. It is natural for a lion to kill an antelope instinctually, but humans have a choice. Animals share a great deal of DNA with ourselves, but somehow humans have free will and no one knows how this miracle is achieved by our genetics. We already know that gene therapy experiments on animals often go horribly wrong. Is the highly developed and prized capacity of humans for creativity, morality and empathy something that can be put at risk by genetic manipulation? No one is asking this question, because the complexity of genetic function is beyond current science. Yet some scientists feel gaily confident to interfere with millions of years of evolution. This weird bravado is completely at odds with past experimentation which has had disastrous results. Now it is being forced upon the whole population without a moral qualm. The insensitivity is frightening.

Research reveals the vaccinated despise the unvaccinated

Some propose that this is a form of mass hypnosis or others that our fear of illness is being cleverly exploited.

Many have close friends or relatives who have become suddenly angry and ready to cut off all ties. The insensitivity is frightening. Researchers at Aarhus University in Denmark surveyed attitudes in 21 countries and found that vaccinated people despise those who refuse to get the jab – but the opposite is not true. The researchers found that vaccinated people made “stereotypic inferences that unvaccinated individuals are untrustworthy and unintelligent, making the antipathy resemble prejudice towards other deviant groups”.

However, those who have refused the jab by and large do not think less of those who sought the protection it apparently offered.

The researchers said: “In the short run, prejudice against the unvaccinated may complicate pandemic management. In the long run, it may mean that societies leave the pandemic more divided than they entered.”

Is a loss of cognitive ability destroying our world?

Have these extreme attitudes been curated by governments and mainstream media, or are they driven by a loss of cognitive perspective? President Macron says he wants “to piss off the unvaccinated”, Justin Trudeau refers to protestors as “taking some space” and adds “do we tolerate these people?”, and Jacinda Ardern says “the unvaccinated don’t deserve everyday activities”. Are they expressing carefully considered political sentiments or has their judgement been impaired and their emotions inflamed? Is their refusal to openly debate scientific issues, a mark of immature thinking? Have they reverted to a more primitive and fearful outlook than that they professed two years ago, and why would they do so?

It is certainly the case that evolutionary biologists argue that increased genetic sophistication led to higher human abilities. So can we lose them through genetic experimentation?

We are witnessing a world hazarding a war whose worst consequences are almost unthinkable—nuclear annihilation. In this, the whole world has gone beyond brinkmanship to impetuous conflict. Perhaps the judgement of some politicians has been degraded to the point that frustration, anger, and irrational imaginings of power are sufficient to override any consideration of human extinction.

We may never find out until until we have passed the point of no return, but the question of the day is:

If our intelligence is intimately linked to our DNA, can it be degraded by gene-based vaccines?


Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a food testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID). Website: HatchardReport.com.

Guy is the author of ‘Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness’.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of dailytelegraph.co.nz.

Promoted Content

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please keep comments respectful, civil and constructive. Moderation times can vary from a few minutes to a few hours. Comments may also be scanned periodically by Artificial Intelligence to eliminate trolls and spam.


  1. cognitive ability, severely lacking in today’s world. I am and will remain unjabbed because 1 It is an experimental gene therapy
    2 Why do they not want a control group.
    3 The CDC wants to hide the data they used to authorize the emergency use for 75 years. let that sink in.

    • Good reasons that I agree with. My other one is that I like my immune system to do what it is made to do, fight bugs and learn from it. This is why, being an asthmatic, I turn down the flu jab every year. I trust my body to do its job. Same goes with covid. Being in my mid 40s I am not scared of covid. I can look at Australian stats. Before vax rollout, I was about 1 chance in 1500 to die according to their stats. Now the stats show 124448 cases in 40 year old bracket with 52 deaths. That is one chance in 2393 of death if I catch covid. Or a CFR of 0.04%.

      • There may be an argument that the chances of death have lessened because of the jab.
        But it could just as well be that omicron is a mild strain like doctors from South Africa were/are saying.

        • What are the real death rates for the jab. Large insurance companies in the states have professional actuaries that have all count mortalities up 40% since the roll out of the jab.

        • There is no factual basis that the jabs (experimental drugs) have saved lives. That is pure horse manure pushed by authorities in western countries, particularly in NZ.

          In fact the jabs have increased infection (by WEAKENING the immune system) and among a number of serious side effects also causes death. This is not a theory but fact. There is more to come in the next 2-3 years. Unfortunately all these jab related deaths will be magically attributed to something else.

          Team of 5 million, help protect whanau, Tamariki, are sound bites and fictional jingoism. One thing this scandemic has shown, the average everyday NZDer lacks any critical thinking, hack doesn’t even use basic common sense. Jabcinda would be laughing her tits off knowing how gullible majority of Kiwis are. No other leader anywhere has been able to fool over 90% of the population so easily and there is more nastiness to come from the sad piece of garbage masquerading as a PM.

          Even after Pfizer/FDA releasing the latest data on the effects of mRNA, there will be no stopping these jabs here. We live in a cocoon mesmerised by this evil witch and her criminal cohorts.

  2. Interesting article. I have been thinking along the same lines. I made the mistake of getting one jab so that I could continue to take my kid to activities. But a couple of weeks after receiving it my kid randomly said to me ” Dad, after getting that vaccine you have become really grumpy”. Hardly sientific I know but inyeresting observation from a 9 year old.

  3. An engaging read. Considering the strange behaviour of politicians these last several years – even before ‘Covid’ – it sure looks like SOMETHING has crossed their blood-brain barrier. They have been ‘programmed’. Even the blind can see it.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here




Daily Life


broken clouds
13.2 ° C
13.8 °
8.9 °
87 %
75 %
13 °
16 °
15 °
16 °
15 °
-- Free Ads --spot_img