15.1 C
Auckland
Saturday, May 18, 2024

Popular Now

Ted Rall
Ted Rallhttps://www.gocomics.com/ted-rall
Ted Rall is a syndicated editorial cartoonist, opinion columnist, graphic novelist, author, and occasional war correspondent. A graduate of Columbia University with honours in history, Rall is a Pulitzer Prize finalist and two-time winner of the Robert F. Kennedy Journalism Award for outstanding coverage of problems faced by the disadvantaged.

How About Equal Time for The Truth?

Journalistic standards news

Mark Twain said: “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes.”

Ironically, he didn’t. The quotation should correctly be attributed to Jonathan Swift. The lie remains in high orbit.

Even when the truth comes to light, it gets nothing close to the wide distribution of the original disinformation. Liberal and conservative historians agree the Tonkin Gulf incident, as described to Congress by an LBJ out to lie the country into invading Vietnam, never happened; how many Americans know that? Despite the absence of evidence, 40% of Americans believe the 2020 presidential election was stolen. Corporate media promoted the outlandish theory that Russia bombed its own natural gas pipeline and now admit there’s no way that’s true; even well-read and well-informed news consumers can be forgiven for having missed the blink-and-you’ll-miss-it retractions.

Can we fight the “psyopcracy,” a media environment saturated by sophisticated psychological operations that create an alternative reality designed to expand US influence overseas and stifle dissent in the US?

The challenge is enormous. Political partisans prefer news content that confirms their pre-existing biases. And corporate media outlets, having long abandoned oppositional coverage of the political class in favour of access journalism, are happy to help. Corporate bosses save expenses by allowing reporters not to have to check things out as long as those things are uttered by an official, wearing a suit. Why not dish out (free) government propaganda?

We may not be able to win the fight for journalistic integrity. But we should define what winning, or at least, starting to win, might look like.

In states like Utah, Michigan and Wisconsin, newspapers, broadcast outlets and other journalistic organizations that publish a libelous story can dodge a defamation lawsuit by quickly issuing a retraction of equal or greater prominence than the offending article. The correction should amount to the same or a greater number of words or broadcast time, feature a headline of equal or greater size, appear in a similar font of equal or bigger size, and be placed at least as prominently as the original, mistaken piece. If the defamatory material appeared on the front page, a page 33 retraction is deemed inadequate.

Dictating similar remedies on the federal level would not pass constitutional muster. But the following thought exercise is useful when, considering the standards that ought to be voluntarily adhered to by media organizations. Imagine, if you can, in this day of spin and bluster, that media outlets who publish misinformation and disinformation — specifically, those that do so intentionally, after having been made aware of serious doubts about the material — were required to give equal prominent to the corrections after they got a story wrong.

Though I empathize and sympathize with individual victims of libel, my concern here is major-league fraud, perpetrated against readers and news consumers, in some instances so severe that they can provoke international conflict.

What if we lived in a world where all the journalistic enterprises that distributed George W. Bush’s lies about Saddam Hussein’s purported weapons of mass destruction and supposed ties to Al Qaeda had been required to run the same number of stories, at the same word count, at equal levels of prominence, about the fact that Bush and his minions had lied the country into a war that killed a million Iraqis and destroyed America’s reputation around the world?

Countering Bush’s propaganda with an equal flow of anti-Bush truth might have prompted voters not to reelect him in 2004.

Instead, half of Republican voters still believed, 12 years after the invasion in 2015, that the US had found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. It did not. If you don’t think delusions like that have widespread, political, implications, or that some of those Republicans might have become Democrats if they knew the truth about George W. Bush, I have a war I’d like to sell you.

Some journalists might worry about a chilling effect. What if a newspaper was more reluctant, more cautious to go with a story that they weren’t totally sure about? What if they were required to take an extra day or two to verify their assertions? What, if, in such cases, rather than endlessly repeating the same narrative, they published it fewer times?

It’s hard to see how any of these consequences would pose a threat to a vibrant and free press.

Of course, the truth deserves more than equal time with lies. People who fall for the lies can easily miss, subsequent truthful, retractions.

Equal time isn’t nearly enough. But it’s a start.

Image credit: cottonbro studio

Promoted Content

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please keep comments respectful, civil and constructive. Moderation times can vary from a few minutes to a few hours. Comments may also be scanned periodically by Artificial Intelligence to eliminate trolls and spam.

5 COMMENTS

  1. Fascinating. Remember Jacinda said that she was the sole source of truth. What a lie that was. For two years people believed her, but gradually the ink began to fade. Only a few of her devoted sheeple believe that. Or as time marched on and we became less concerned about Covid; perhaps we dont care about the lie anymore. But we should.Otherwise her WEF team mates will resuurect another lie. Is Luxon going to perpetuate the lie?

  2. Are you trying to tell me the 2020 election that was stolen by the Democrats, the ones that keep lying and gave us Covid and made another war and keep the money laundering scam gping, was a lie? No. I saw it all happening right in front of my eyes on the TV screens of all the skull duggery, hyjinks and blatant cheating going on. The fact that there was no ‘proof’ they say, is a lie. Who controls the courts? Just like their is no proof the Vaccine is safe and effective. Ha ha bloody ha! The lying is so much now that it is way too obvious. Ironic? yes about Jonathan Swift. How many centuries old and to be the victim with his own saying.

  3. Well said. And it’s true that we have, for quite some time, been prey to outright dishonesty in mainstream media due mainly to them not doing their job properly.

    And while equal time is a wonderful idea, in reality it is never going to happen. The first lie was sown in Eden and its seed has followed down the millennia. There is only one truth to be relied upon, may He bless us all and give His comfort in the years that lay ahead. 🌹

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest

Trending

Sport

Daily Life

Opinion

Wellington
few clouds
12.3 ° C
13.4 °
11 °
82 %
6.7kmh
20 %
Sat
13 °
Sun
13 °
Mon
13 °
Tue
14 °
Wed
12 °
-- Free Ads --spot_img