If we cannot trust the Prime Minister to protect our unborn children, then why should we trust him to protect us?
How can he, as a, loving husband and father, approve of the violence of abortion being inflicted on unborn children and their mothers?
Right to Life, in loving concern, warns the Prime Minister that it is folly to focus attention on the fickle judgment of the electorate at the ballot box at the next general election in 2026, while ignoring the ultimate judgment of his Creator on judgment day who will ask, “why did you not protect my precious infants and their beautiful mothers from the violence of abortion?
The Prime Minister, Christopher Luxon, confirmed on Radio NZ on 22 January 2025, that “abortion rights groups have nothing to worry about, there will be no change to access to abortion or to funding”. Prior to the 2023 general election he promised that if the abortion law was changed, then he would resign from parliament. This is not a clarion call from the high moral ground, but a disgraceful declaration that the blood of our children is a justifiable price to pay for political power.
Right to Life is disappointed in this response which is a public statement by the leader of the government of its complicity in the murder of our own children, that it:-
Rejects the fifth commandment of God, Thou shalt not kill.
Refuses to recognise the humanity of the unborn from conception endowed by its Creator with an inalienable right to life.
Denies its responsibility to protect the lives of our unborn children who are the weakest and most defenceless members of our human family.
Approves of the violence of abortion being inflicted on unborn children and their mothers
Funds the killing of unborn children.
This commitment was made in response to a protest from the Abortion Law Reform Association [ALRANZ] at the appointment of Simeon Brown as Minister of Health, who is opposed to violence against women and their defenceless unborn children. Right to Life is surprised that the Prime Minister is not aware that ALRANZ is a small and insignificant anti-feminist group, which had only about fifteen paid up members in 2023 and little support in our community.
The Prime Minister has said that health will be a priority in 2025; If it is a priority, then stop treating pregnancy as a disease and abortion as a “health service”. It is to the government’s shame that 16,277 unborn New Zealanders were killed before birth in 2023 and their precious mothers violently wounded physically, psychologically and spiritually. For the health of our nation, suffering from a below replacement birth rate of 1.56 and threatened by a demographic Winter, the government has an urgent need to promote adoption, procreation of children and the natural family, established by God, of exclusively one woman and one man.
(Taxpayers) “Funds the killing of unborn children”. ($16K+)
And what REALLY happens to the fetuses of these unborn. Does the cult have a market for these?
I agree 100%!!!
If conception is a result of rape – an act of violence on a female – then be aware that the real criminal here is the male. If someone has to die, make it him.
Men who condemn abortion are misogynistic zealots who know they will never have to undergo childbirth. Zealots who quote the commandment of a god not everyone believes in and who demand the right to enforce their beliefs upon and override the rights of a woman to her own body.
Sigh 😑
The body of the unborn child is NOT “her own body”, it’s someone else’s body. Deciding whether or not to end someone else’s life should not be YOUR “right”. The rape is not the baby’s fault, the baby shouldn’t have to die for it.
I agree with you 100% that the man who does the raping should be the one to suffer. Prosecute, incarcerate, execute – I’m all for it. NO MERCY- Bring absolute hell down upon him. The woman shouldn’t have to suffer at all, but unfortunately nothing can stop that because the suffering has already happened because the rape has already been committed.
And as bad as the notion of having to carry a rapist’s child is, I’ve seen and read many horror stories about what some of these poor women go through psychologically when they elect to abort. The trauma, the nightmares, the physical pain from the myriad of complications that sometimes arise. Forgive my bigoted, racist male brain but I just don’t see how treating an horrific psychological ordeal with ANOTHER horrific psychological ordeal benefits the woman in ANY way. And no one has ever given me a satisfactory answer to that. Aborting the baby does NOT ease the woman’s suffering, it doesn’t help her psychologically and it doesn’t undo what happened to her. It doesn’t change the past. It is of precisely ZERO utility to anyone but the corrupt biomedical industry who trade in aborted fetal tissue and the politicians that they finance.
If you don’t want the child, and I fully understand and do not judge you for it, give the child to someone who does. There are literally thousands and thousands of childless people who would give anything to have a newborn baby to love.
And I know the pro-abortion people absolutely HATE that position and practically go feral whenever they hear it (because it’s the morally CORRECT position because no one has to die for it to reach the same end result), but I’m honestly tired of being called a “zealot” for simply stating facts.
” if you don t want the child, give it to someone who does”
I am sure sexual deviants such as gays and lesbians would love it !!
Well if God decided to live people childless, they will have to accept it, won t they.
There are a lot of already born children in need of foster parents. But nobody seems to want them. They are not ” perfect” you see…
But i recognize your intentions are good
(1) A misogynist is usually defined as “one who hates women”.
Now, New Zealand has around 14,000 reported abortions every year, resulting the murder of an unborn child. Approximately one half of would be female babies, i.e. around 7,000 females are murdered each year by abortion.
As such, it makes no sense whatsoever that claim that “men who condemn abortion are misogynistic zealots”, for it is these very same men who desire to save the lives of 7,000 female babies in NZ each year (as well as the 7,000 males babies also).
(2) To claim “who demand the right to enforce their beliefs upon …”
However, you yourself are engaging in exactly the same “right to enforce your own belief”, when you desire to forcible prevent those who oppose abortion from being successful in implementing laws which protect the unborn baby.
You are also acting as a “zealot” imposing your own belief that unborn babies should have no right to life. And this belief of yours comes from a commitment that equally “not everyone believes in”.
You cannot condemn those who oppose abortion for wanting to take political action, for you yourself want to take political action against them, in order to stop them.
There is no neutrality.
(3) You state, “override the rights of a woman to her own body”.
Firstly, the unborn baby is decidedly not the mother’s body. It is a separate person.
Secondly, there is no absolute right to do as you wish with your body.
Consider: If a woman had a 3 year old child, and decided to exercise a fictitious “right to her own body”, in that she refused to feed, cloth, and look after the 3 year old child: then she would be deemed guilty of child abuse.
If a madman kidnapped a woman, and a 3 month baby, placed them on a small boat by themselves, with enough resources to get to land and safety: but the women refused to help the 3 month child, and let it starve to death whilst rescuing herself alone: again she would be guilty.
There is no moral difference between a child in the womb and the 3 year old, or 3 month year old.
To take the life of the unborn is to murder the weakest and most vulnerable citizens – those who most need care and protection.
And so I asked the Lord; “Where are the leaders, scientists, and those of great knowledge that You promised us, Lord?”
To which the Lord replied “You aborted them all!”
And based on abortion stats, 1/3rd of the graduating classes from higher education in 2024 are…missing!
The Phil Collins song ‘Mama’ starts out with what sounds like a heartbeat, with something more sinister in the background music, ie getting ready for the ‘procedure’…
Collin’s vocalisation at the end of the song is portrayed in lamented to be the dying fetus…and once again, Phil Collins with his musical genius calls out the injustice that has the horror reflected in the music, kyrics and vocal style!
Abortion is a satanic ritual of blood sacrifice that runs parallel to Talmudic Blood Libel; THAT is why it’s ‘Legal’ and tolerated in many States and Nations!
Rudolf Steiner noted that every human being has worth, irrespective of background, disability, and / or being forced to live in a social lower class & caste.
Interesting that many women use abortion as a form of birth control. Many of these types are far-left Demoncrats, and Pussy Hatted Snowflakes with hateful views on virtually everything and everyone.
https://www.unz.com/article/like-venomous-reptiles-they-warn-us/
Absolutely correct with the Phil Collin’s hidden meaning in ‘Mama’
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mama_(Genesis_song)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzraeaFx-ag
One can interpret the lyrics in the two ways described in Wikipedia, But my opin is that it’s a protest against the sanctity of life!
Indeed, many women commited suicide when pregnant and abandonned by the author of the pregnancy.
Chosing death rather than the ostracization of family, churches an society.
Many men are just liars and irresponsible cowards
All male’s opinion knowing nothing about pregnancy and why woman take the decision to abort