12 C
Thursday, June 20, 2024

Popular Now

Government to remove entrenchment from Three Waters legislation

Three Waters Entrenchment news

The Government will fix the Water Services Entities Bill this week by removing the entrenchment clause that was voted on during committee stages, Leader of the House Chris Hipkins announced today.

“It was a mistake to put the entrenchment clause in and the Government will fix the issue as soon as the House resumes on Tuesday,” Chris Hipkins said.

“We will do this by sending the Water Services Entities Bill back to the Committee of the Whole to remove the entrenchment provision.

“The Bill has just finished committee stages, so we can easily send it back and fix the issue before the final reading.

“The intention to protect assets from being sold was right, but entrenchment usually requires a super majority or seventy five percent of the parliament to vote for it.

“The approach in this amendment allowed an entrenchment provision to pass in a way that is not typical for parliament. That has wider ramifications that we are not comfortable with. That’s why we will fix the issue.

“It’s also important Parliament strengthens the rules around entrenchment generally to avoid this in the future.

“As such we will refer the wider matter to the Standing Orders Committee, where all parties are represented, in order to strengthen the protections for entrenchment provisions.

“We will ask the Committee to look at where entrenchment provisions are appropriate and what majority should be required for them.

“It is important to note the entrenchment clause only applied to maintaining public ownership of water assets. In order to protect against privatisation of these assets we will also be seeking political assurances from the National and ACT parties via letters that ask them to commit to public ownership.

“We hope they commit to keeping water assets in public ownership, especially given their previous track record of selling public assets,” Chris Hipkins said.

Promoted Content

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please keep comments respectful, civil and constructive. Moderation times can vary from a few minutes to a few hours. Comments may also be scanned periodically by Artificial Intelligence to eliminate trolls and spam.


  1. I think this entrenchment clause was a planned distraction to steer attention away from the actual crime, which is passing Three Waters under urgency despite public opposition to it.
    Painting themselves to be the good guys who listened to the people’s concern.

    • Yeah I’m not fooled by their supposed ‘backtrack’.

      Why don’t they just backtrack on the whole 3 waters debarcle? They are doing this AGAINST the will of the majority of New Zealanders who pay taxes, rates and who the politicians claim to represent.

      Worst govt this country has ever had.

    • Yeah they might as well go ahead and entrench the absolute sh!t out of it. Never in a million years would a future National govt lift a finger to reverse it anyway.

      Lol, as if.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here




Daily Life


broken clouds
8.7 ° C
9.8 °
7.2 °
85 %
75 %
10 °
12 °
12 °
12 °
11 °