Experts have known of post-COVID jab heart-scarring for up to 6 months, but new Hong Kong study shows its still there at one year.
A new study by Yu and Colleagues in Hong Kong confirms 58% of adolescents with mRNA COVID jab induced heart abnormalities continued to suffer from the conditions one year after the jab. The new findings have experts fearing COVID jab heart damage in the age group could be permanent.
Expert cardiologist Peter McCullough shared his interpretation of the study’s finding on his Substack today.
‘Forty adolescents, mean age of 15, mostly boys were evaluated. It was notable that 73% had no cardiac symptoms, so without an evaluation, the parents would have had no idea their child was suffering heart damage from the COVID-19 vaccine. Approximately 18% of cases initially had reduced left ventricular ejection fraction indicating they were at risk for the development of heart failure.
‘The authors point out that several other studies have found a majority of COVID-19 vaccine myocarditis cases with abnormal cardiac MRI findings have not resolved at 3-6 months. Now the report by Yu and colleagues suggest the damage may be permanent at a year.’
McCullough, one of the most cited cardiologists in US medical history has been a vocal opponent of mass mRNA injection.
‘Almost everyday the news brings another story of a young person dying of cardiac arrest. It is a sickening realization that COVID-19 vaccine induced myocarditis could leave a zone of scar in the heart, risking the chance of ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest at any time. Recently Hulscher et al have conclusively shown by autopsy that COVID-19 vaccine induced myocarditis can be fatal.’
Crimes against humanity that will sadly go unpunished.
They might as well go back to trepanning and leeches.
The medical industry is vile.
Historically, healthcare data shows 75% of these patients will die within 10 years. For those with severe symptoms, life expectancy is 5 years or less. Heart transplant improves survivability. H
I’ve actually wondered if having a heart transplant does improve the situation. I must point out that I have seen no data to indicate that it does not. However, it is the spike protein generators introduced by the vaccine that cause heart damage in the first place. So, if the heart is transplanted then I wonder if the spike proteins which are still there in the body will damage the new heart in time?
If this is true, then the same situation would occur for any transplant in the vaccinated. Perhaps, really what needs to be removed are the spike protein generators.
👍 I’ve read, the spike protein can possibly be degraded with Nattokinase supplement, idk fr.
The problem isn’t in the organ, it’s in the blood supply being fed to the organ. The lipid nanoparticle and spike protein are carried in the blood, so circulating everywhere.
It would be like trying to fix old motor oil by replacing the filter. No such thing as a “blood-change” unfortunately.
The transplanted organ will likely fail in time as well.
hart from organ harvesting in Ukraine ?
Avoided the vaccine? Not so fast: new study says most Americans have been vaccinated by their neighbors via “shedding”
https://www.zerohedge.com/sponsored-post/avoided-vaccine-not-so-fast-new-study-says-most-americans-have-been-vaccinated-their
I don’t know how old that study is. I’ve recently seen studies showing antibody transfer, no spike protein transfer.
The Medical Mafia
http://whale.to/a/medical_mafia.html
Its time for the police to get off their asses and open a criminal investigation.
therefore the police/judiciary need a complaint.Either by a government body;
or by associated and regrouped burghers. You will then need a law office to represent you
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/new-video-interviews-two-with-dr?publication_id=37889&post_id=135943106&triggerShare=true&isFreemail=true