11.1 C
Tuesday, July 23, 2024

Popular Now

Guy Hatchard
Guy Hatchardhttps://hatchardreport.com/
Guy Hatchard PhD is a statistician and former senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food safety testing and certification laboratory. Guy's book 'Your DNA Diet' is available on Amazon.com.

Guy Hatchard: A timely message for the vaccinated

COVID vaccination news

Pandemic policy is slowly changing in response to health data. Is it changing fast enough or is it changing in the right direction?

From the beginning, there were concerns about the long term outcomes following both covid infection and vaccination. At this point these are becoming more clearly appreciated.

Neither the dire predictions of widespread Covid severity nor the protection of Covid vaccination have eventuated as initially promised.

Health authorities remain heavily committed to a Covid strategy that relies upon mRNA vaccination. Is it working?

All cause mortality has reached record levels. Our health system is reportedly overwhelmed. mRNA vaccination does not prevent Covid infection. Why?

The reasons for these effects are technical, but were not unexpected. There has always been a fear that mRNA vaccination might depress immune function.

Antibody-Dependent Enhancement

Vaccine-induced antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) occurs when our immune antibodies generated as a result of vaccination combine with a pathogen to facilitate its entry into cells and thereby enhance infection. In one sense we could say this occurs because our immune system becomes so familiar with a pathogen that it learns to accept it. The result can be repeated infections.

A ground-breaking paper from Japan published on 16 September 2022 entitled “Reevaluation of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection in anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapeutic antibodies and mRNA-vaccine antisera using FcR- and ACE2-positive cells” explores this possibility and concludes that both therapeutic antibody Covid treatments and mRNA vaccination can result in ADE.

Are there sufficient reasons to exercise caution?

Does this mean that mRNA Covid vaccination programmes should be halted? At this point, policy makers are beginning to entertain divergent opinions. Denmark has halted Covid vaccination for the under 50s. The UK has halted vaccination for the under 12’s. 

Amid growing concerns, the most worrying trend is for authorities and employers to double down on vaccine requirements or dismiss questioning voices out of hand in a manner that is detached from the evolving scientific findings. Incredibly, the Netherlands is discussing the reintroduction of vaccine passes.

It is important to understand that vaccination in general is the mainstay of medical policy everywhere. From the outset, it was always accepted that mRNA vaccination would be effective and safe. Now significant doubts have arisen, but like a poker player who has gone all in on a bet, changing strategies does not look possible to many in the medical profession. They are hoping that more of the same—more boosters will pull everyone through.

Conversely a number of strong vaccine advocates are expressing doubts and wavering. Dr. Paul Offit, a pediatrician specializing in infectious diseases and an world expert on vaccines, immunology, and virology who is a contributing editor of the authoritative New England Journal of Medicine doesn’t himself intend to get omicron-specific boosters and doesn’t advise it for others. He says the research is insufficient. He also worries that mRNA vaccination has been inappropriately offered to young people. Steve Kirsch has suggested (tongue in cheek) that he now fits the dictionary definition of an anti-vaxxer.

Offit is by no means the only one speaking up, at this point, discussions about mRNA vaccine safety are being widely aired. See this article in SSRN “COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters for Young Adults: A Risk-Benefit Assessment and Five Ethical Arguments against Mandates at Universities“.

There is still a lot that we don’t know. I have written extensively about this over the last few weeks at the HatchardReport.com and referenced the issue to recent journal publications. 

All-cause mortality is rising. The real concern here is that governments have been very cagey about releasing data on cause of death paired with vaccination status—a prerequisite for definitive research. Where data is available, such as from UK ONS, it strongly points to a concerning relationship between all cause death and Covid vaccination. MSM is reluctant to cover these issues, especially ADE.

When science can be labelled disinformation

Jacinda Ardern has flown to New York in a private jet with Emmanuel Macron, and Justine Trudeau for a week of intense diplomacy with world leaders. Her focus is expected to be on controlling mis- and disinformation, and online extremism. 

Just remember that last September NZ health officials and advisors dismissed as disinformation claims by NZ GP Dr. Peter Canaday that mRNA vaccination can result in ADE. It never was disinformation, Canaday was simply seeking to initiate a scientific discussion based on published research and theoretical inference. Now ADE is a scientifically recognised result of mRNA vaccination, so he was right to probe the issues. 

This wasn’t Dr. Canaday’s only claim. He also suggested mRNA vaccines are not very effective at preventing transmission. A claim that was also dismissed as disinformation at the time. Something that we now know to be true.

My suggestion is that we are being left partially in the dark. This is partly because mRNA vaccination safety has become a hot potato that no one wants to hold and partly the result of vaccine extremism. Public safety should have been paramount. New research is raising concerning issues. 

We are referencing human health here, not political allegiance. This is fundamentally a scientific matter. Therefore you might consider joining those who are asking hard questions and expecting answers. Otherwise new research findings could be swept under the carpet and deliberately withheld from the public.

Image credit: RF._.Studio

Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a food testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID). Website: HatchardReport.com.

Guy is the author of ‘Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness’.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of DTNZ.

Promoted Content

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please keep comments respectful, civil and constructive. Moderation times can vary from a few minutes to a few hours. Comments may also be scanned periodically by Artificial Intelligence to eliminate trolls and spam.


  1. Good evening,

    For myself I hold Public Health is concerned for Majority health; while it is concerned for minority welfare, it does not exist to sacrifice the welfare of majorities to them. Initially the choices were black white & simple. Vaccination improved public health. Yet with the passage of time, more & more studies have questioned this assumption, Today it is no longer black white or simple, we now need a science degree to even participate in the debate.

    The general public have thus given up; resorting instead to conspiracy theories expressing venomous hatred instead of a reasoned & open debate. This is likely to continue until science settles the question one way or the other. Which raises the question are modern issues TOO TECHNICALLY COMPLEX for ordinary people to participate in the debate; & another question ~what happens to democracy if they can’t~.

    • Good evening Ken
      A few moot points!!!
      Some of us didn’t just go to school to eat our lunch! Unlike you obviously!!!
      – Typing errors!
      – Spelling errors!
      – Incorrect grammar!
      And to quote you “TOO TECHNICALLY COMPLEX”
      Fits you well…
      Perhaps you should keep to eating your lunch instead of commenting on topics that are obviously…
      Enjoy your tea and biscuits …. while you can

  2. In response to Guys claim deaths from all causes are increasing. In January last year i suffered an epileptic fit, This was just when new Covid precautions effectively isolated me from the specialists I needed to see. Sheer persistence on my part ensured we eventually got a good result, But it took much longer than it should.

    I thus ask Guy to consider if deaths from all causes are increasing, is that attributable to the vaccine itself, or attributable to an effective shut down of general health services

    • Hi Ken It no doubt has multiple causes including lack of care due to health service overload, but the UK figures show that deaths are disproportionately affecting the vaccinated, so the vaccine is playing its part.

      • Guy thank you for your response.

        I expect the UK figures to be soundly based, if they show increased death rate for those vaccinated THEN THEY ARE LIKELY TO BE CORRECT.

        I hold when Covid first emerged Governments knew they had to do ~something~ to contain it; I have long held the ~something~ chosen was excessive & way over the top. Yet I do not attribute this to a AXIS OF EVIL; rather to a lack of hard information available at the time .

        The public was demanding action so governments had to respond. Democracy EXPECTS Government to respond to public demand; western Governments did as the public demanded. If further information reveals it as a bad choice, I am not interested in witch hunts against authorities; rather I blame the general public who demanded this INADEQUATELY INFORMED action

        • Guy, when Covid first emerged the only thing known about it was this deadly disease had risen out of the bowels of the earth, ( it was originally attributed to bats) & was killing people everywhere, including young healthy people. That was all that was known. The general public was ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED OF IT,   & everywhere people were demanding the Government take action to protect our citizens.  While one comment below holds they should have held a public referendum before imposing such upon us; the action had widespread public support at the time; giving it such a MANDATE; no referendum was necessary.

          Thus was made what now looks like a uniformed decision; today we have much more information so we can correct this error. Note error does not mean EVIL.

          • People were so scared that no referendums were necessary?! Jesus ????????

            And you can’t understand why some of us suspect the government deliberately drummed up fear in order to bestow upon themselves all those shiny new emergency powers? Nah, we’re just crazy aren’t we?

          • You are kidding yourself. I like many other people made sure that people and organisations in charge of the covid response were well aware of the negative outcomes from more lockdowns, masking and mandating an experimental new type of medicine. They all knew because many people were telling them, and still they did those things to all NZers. Used the media to scare people. Suppressed early treatments. Made people disciminate even though they knew from countries months ahead of us in vaccination it was useless at stopping transmission and illness.

            They are not mistakes, they were draconian measures implemented in lockstep in western countries. Stop pretending they were’nt

        • “the public was demanding action so governments had to respond. Democracy EXPECTS Government to respond to public demand; western Governments did as the public demanded. ”

          The public were manipulated by the media and the government. No one was demanding the lockdowns that I can recall, unless you mean Fface michael faker

        • Wrong Ken. When Co(n)vid first emerged, Government (WEF chosen ones like Jacinda and cohorts) went into sustained propaganda and forced lockdowns to scare people. All other views were thoroughly dismissed or not given platform and Jabsinister proclaimed only her and puppeteers will be the source of truth. Mass testing followed through a very dodgy PCR testing regime which gave false results. Jabs were forced on people and NZers had to make a decision which they never had to before. Take the shot or loose your ability to earn and provide for your family.

          Fact is govt knew in advance, well in advance these jabs had some serious question marks around it. Med Safe under pressure swept this under the carpet, MBIE failed to do its due diligence properly and neither did MOH. Additionally a lot of so called doctors and experts who were advising the govt also new. Dig up Sean Plunket’s interview with Helen Petrousis from few days ago. This kind of behavior is nothing short of criminal, not just negligence.

          Ken, you are looking at this situation in isolation. Research will show you, how the likes of Bill Gates (who has ZERO knowledge about vaccines (or anything else he seems to be banging on about), Big Pharma, WEF, Bankers and most Western governments (puppets) are involved in something a lot more sinister. And mass psychosis has got people absolutely blinded.

          Imagine a virus so deadly that you have to be tested for it.
          Imagine a vaccine so safe that you have to be forced to take it.

  3. Perhaps the general public would have been less inclined to resort to “conspiracy theories” (which coincidentally keep coming true) and “venomous hatred” if the events of the past two years had been consulted and voted on by public consensus and democratic referendum instead of pushed through by police/military force and threats/coercion. Maybe if they had listened to our concerns instead of screaming viciously at us to shut up, maybe if they hadn’t banned and censored and demonised us at every turn for being legitimately concerned about legitimately new and untested vaccines being legitimately forced onto the population, maybe if they hadn’t threatened (and often actually TAKEN) our jobs from us punitively, maybe then we might have been more reasonable?

    I dunno, I don’t have one of those fancy science qualifications you believe afford me the right to think, so I guess I’m just too stupid to have an opinion on it, right? Us mere mortals with our crazy notions of having a say over our own lives, tsk tsk.

    I’ve known a few people who were drunk on the leftist coolade, but good God! You seem like you’ve been BAPTISED in it, dude. Why don’t you go tow the government line somewhere else

    • For myself I have many disagreements with the current Government, I also as I posted hold myself a direct victim of the excesses they went to over Covid. Yet I REFUSE to join in th4 general Hysteria of venomous hatred advanced by people like yourself & Mr, Anonymous. Hatred is a a NEGATIVE response & never acheves anything of merit. JUST NOT MY STYLE i GUESS

    • I fhold those who express a doctrine of venomous hatred are listening to Bats in their own belfry & these have no existence outside their own immagings.  I yet further hold Bats to be very bad advisors, deeply malignant & poisonous; remember Covid itself originated in Bats.

      While this Christian seeks guidance from Angels in my own belfry, & I admit these too may have no existence beyond my own imaginings. Yet I find Angels better advisors than Bats; they treat all people with compassion & consideration, & offer me something more constructive to build a better society out off,  So I am happy having Angels in my belfry whether they be imaginary or not. It is a pity other people do not take up such good & trustworthy advisors rather than allowing themselves & their world to be poisoned by Bats,

      • Ken.Hope this clears things up for you! Reading is one thing , discerning what you read another, remembering what you read another. The covid hoax has been known about since the 80,s You are ignorant. Please study up. COVID, if it’s really COVID, is easily treated. Vaxx is poison but they have mixed placebos in the supply chain so not everyone gets sick from the vaxx. Then people will say “Joe got the vaxx and he had no side effects.” I found this on a post:
        JC 10/08/2021
        It’s a plan. They are targeting the old, the weak, the useless, and the stupid. That’s just the beginning.
        G.A. Stewart:
        May 11, 2021
        Jacques Attali was an advisor to François Mitterrand (former President of France) and wrote this in 1981:
        This fragment is excerpted from his book “Brief History of the Future”, published in France in 2006.
        “In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old man, because once he is over 60-65 years old, man lives longer than he produces and it costs society dearly.
        Then the weak, and then the useless who do not contribute anything to society, because there will be more and more, and especially finally, the stupid.
        Euthanasia directed at these groups; euthanasia must be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases. (our emphasis)
        Of course, we will not be able to execute people or organize camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe that it is for their own good.
        Too large a population, and for the most part unnecessary, is something economically too expensive. Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to stop abruptly rather than gradually deteriorate.
        We won’t be able to pass intelligence tests on millions and millions of people, you can imagine!
        We will find something or cause it; a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the elderly, it does not matter, the weak and the fearful will succumb.
        The stupid will believe it and ask to be treated. We will have taken care of having planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution.
        The selection of idiots will therefore be done by itself: they will go to the slaughterhouse alone.”
        3 Reply
        Luís Rodrigues-Coelho
        February 1, 2021 at 9:51 pm | #
        He didn’t develop it in Jan 2020; already in 2015 Richard of Rothschild was investing in a system and method for testing for Covid-19 [Google image it]. In 2017 this PCR test already had a patent.
        Understand that all this was planned years in advance and they practiced it several times: 2001 “dark winter”, 2010 Rockeffeler Foundation white “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”, 2017 “SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028” organized by the John Hopkins university, 2018 “Clad X”, sept 2019 “A World at Risk” by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and again John Hopkins oct 2019 “Event 201”.
        I also recommend you read 2001 NASA slide presentation [240] “Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare” given by the then CIA director. Ask yourselves what NASA has to do with psyops, brain projects, smart dust sprayed in the skies which end up in lungs which cause pathologies, microwave radiation and energy weapons and a lot more. Read the very last slide, how they knew that even if people hot to know about this presentation they wouldn’t believe since it look too far-fetched!
        C19 and the Great Reset are part of the same global agenda which is gradually building a global dictatorship; part of the Jewish/communist UN Agenda 21, recently renamed “2030 Goals”!

        Ken, if you don’t get it you soon will.good luck

  4. Mr Maynard ( if that’s your real name) you should go back over your post’s and you will find that hatred and negative comments are indeed your style. You seem to me to have a long enough stick to poke the government just enough to throw people off. It looks like controlled opposition to me. You never miss an opportunity to push the lethal injection, your repetitive narrative is tiresome but I guess until things change we are stuck with you.

    • Dear Mr Anonymous.

      Mr Anonymous, I have said to you before…

      I stand u& publish underr my own name complete e with photo so I can be identified & sued if people want to .

      While people liike yourself post malicious comments from dubious sources under pseudonyms which cannot be identified,

      If you ever stand up & offer an identity I would be very happy to contest your ~slanders~ in open Court.

      • Yeah very brave of you to post under your real name when your every asinine comment is nothing but government talking points.

        No one from Stuff or the Herald will be looking to dox you or get your fired for your obnoxious point of view, and you damn well know it.

        “You silly Jews, hiding in Anne Frank’s house like that. Look at what a brave soldier I am, openly wearing my name tag and not hiding from the fuhrer.

  5. OK I just arrived & do not like what I see or read. But it is your place & under majority rule you control it. For myself I do not need to stay where I am obviously not welcome. So I will simply go away. Enjoy your poisoned sea guys; & don’t worry I won’t be back

    • No one is forcing you to leave Ken, this is not our website and we don’t have majority rule. You’re free to have your own opinions, that’s fine. Whether the rest of us agree or disagree with you, you have every right to be here. That is the difference between us and the left, we don’t demand those who challenge us be silenced.

      But what you CANT do is jump onto a website calling us all misinformed idiots and crazies and conspiracy wackjobs and harping on about your belfry etc and expect no pushback. You can’t espouse a narrow minded government-approved worldview and then try to mock those who don’t think as you do, those who question what they’re told and those who look further than the MSM feeding trough for their information. We’ve had enough insults and smug assholery over the past two years to last us a lifetime, thanks.

      You can’t come into a place and start bullying people and then cry that you’re somehow the victim and are being driven out when you receive pushback. For the record, I didn’t disagree with everything you said (just most of it), but I certainly don’t hate you.

      Stay if you want or leave, it makes no difference to the rest of us, but understand no one is driving you out; the choice is entirely yours.

      • Mr Unquaccinated.

        I take your points with regard to myself.  Now take my points with regard to yourselves.  I enter a site where everyone seems to be competing with each other to crap all over Jacinda.  I appreciate the electoral process can be a bit slow & frustrating & many of us feel it is long past time Jacinda was gone. Yet the whole site just oozes petty spite, hatred & venom; no one enters public life to be treated like a public toilet. 

        Thus while Jacinda is not a person I like or agree with; I find myself obliged to defend her.  Even if it was Adolf Hitler I would probably defend him from groups as poisonous as you lot.   I do not believe we are each other’s style.  The best thing for all parties is for me to leave so surrendering the site to THE MAJORITY of your poisonous selves.

        • Ken, ever ask yourself where all this POISON you’re whining about comes from? Many of us have legitimately suffered under this tyrannical woman, her numbskull cronies and the out of touch global cabal they all serve. We lose and lose and lose. We’re told to shut up and fall in line, stop asking questions and just take the jab. We’re told sorry, life won’t be as easy for our children as it was for us, we just have to stop complaining and lower our expectations. Aspire to less in life because pandemic/climate change/inflation etc, while we see the people RESPONSIBLE for it all grow wealthier.

          And if we complain about any of it we’re painted as nutters and racists and the dregs of society, while the lackeys insufferably smile on camera reminding us all to be kind.

          Of course there is anger. Of course there is contempt and disgust for these people. It’s human nature, and it’s how the MAJORITY of your countrymen feel, it’s just being artificially suppressed.

          This site isn’t some bastion of right wing hatred as you and the lefties believe it to be. It’s just one of the few places left that still has the balls to host an open and uncensored comment section because, I dunno, maybe democracies work best when people are free to speak (NO MATTER WHAT IT IS THEY’RE SAYING). The establishment are tired of struggling to reconcile the fake consensus their media minions put out with the actual sentiment from the man in the street, and that’s the only reason they hide behind their near-comical fear of “hateful words”, and shut down comment sections and free speech everywhere they can.

          If you want to defend that type of government (as well as the woman leading it) you’re free to do so. I disagree with you deeply, but I don’t believe the best thing for all parties is for you to leave. Not at all. We NEED to disagree, we NEED to debate. All I’m saying is take the attitude down about a thousand notches bro. You can’t dole out condescension and contempt for others and then be shocked when they tell you where to stick it.

    • Sorry to see you feel like that Ken.
      WE all have the freedom of speech and debate!
      You had yours!
      We had ours and obviously you didn’t like it, as was the case with us taking exception to your comments!

  6. Mr Vsracer,

    NO I have not yet had my full say.

    I find most of the comments on this site to be oozing petty spite, venom & hate.

    What you ~collectively~ seem to be tryIng to incite is JUSTICE BY LYNCH MOB.

    The USA has a long tradition of such Justice; so Trump can appeal to its quasi legitimacy.

    IN NZ we have NO tradition off Justice by Lynch Mob; such is regarded as brutal lawlessness so is NOT EVEN WANTED.
    This your ~apparent~ appeal to such has no legitimacy.

    • Ken can you clarify to me clearly what I have said that is “slander”?
      You call it “oozing petty spite, venom and hate”
      Sorry I call it the truth!!
      And i’m not trying to incite “Justice by lynch mob” Thats a joke man!
      My point is to try and wake up people who are obviously asleep like you, to wake up and see the reality of what this regime is doing to ALL of us!
      What the WEF and NWO are doing is life changing for ALL of us! And not in a good way.

  7. Lynch Mobs start when some basic wrong is committed, as we agree JA has done.

    Then a group of people get together & keep focusing on the wrong & OVER HYPING IT: they hype each other up until the society explodes in mindless violence.

    This is what I see being attempted here, & I want nothing to do with it!

    I agree JA has done some wrongs against our society; BUT YOUR ABSOLUTE OBSESSION WITH THESE, will not lead to healthier outcomes.

    We have an electoral ~due process~ instead of venting your spleen on this site; get out & have a ~reasonable talk~ with your neighbor, explain to them why you do not feel she should not be reelected, Most Kiwi’s are reasonable people this plan should yield better results than all the mindless hate you are venting on this site

    • I thought you said you were going ???? ken. I’m with kven see ya ???? but you couldn’t help yourself could you… no you had to come back to twist the knife with your ugly hurtful words I wonder if your grandchildren know what a potty mouth granddads got!!!!

    • Hi Ken

      Could you please take the time to listen/watch this video.
      I personally was unaware of what was going on with this covid rubbish until I watched this video made by one of the worlds
      leading Vaccinologist.
      It astounded me and made me very much aware of what was happening.
      Please take the time to watch it


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here




Daily Life


overcast clouds
9.6 ° C
10.8 °
8.3 °
75 %
100 %
10 °
10 °
12 °
11 °
13 °