Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan is facing ridicule after portraying herself as a survivor of a threatening encounter — when, in reality, she was simply asked a blunt, unscripted question by a far-right activist at a press conference.
Thomas Sewell, leader of the National Socialist Network, confronted Allan with accusations that politicians had lost the trust of everyday Australians. “Shouldn’t we have the right to speak in our own country?” he asked. “We’re going to take this country back from politicians like you.” Sewell also claimed that he received strong public support over the weekend, saying, “I had 500 people come up to me and shake my hand.”
Rather than responding directly, Allan fled with her security detail in tow, then later issued a dramatic statement insisting she was “unharmed and undeterred,” and claimed the exchange proved that “Nazis” oppose her government. She went further, linking the moment to Victoria’s incoming anti-hate laws.
“It comes as no surprise that Nazis oppose me and my Government. I wear that with a badge of honour,” she declared, before turning the focus to minority groups. “Whoever you are, whoever you love, whoever you pray to – I’ll always fight for your right to belong.”
Critics Mock Premier’s Reaction
Allan’s statement sparked a wave of mockery online, with many pointing out that no threat or violence had occurred.
“Thank God you survived that brutal onslaught of… being asked a question,” one social media user quipped. Another wrote: “He didn’t go within 20 metres of you — talk about making a mountain out of a molehill.”
Others criticised Allan for staging interactions while avoiding genuine accountability. “You’ll always be out and about in public, but nobody from the public can talk to you unless it’s staged,” one comment read.
Her selective focus also raised eyebrows. “You managed to mention migrants, gays, Aboriginals and Jews but not Australians,” one critic noted. Another summed up the frustration bluntly: “You’re un-Australian. Simple as that. Australians have had enough, especially Victorians.”
“Hey Jacinta!” National Socialist Network leader Tom Sewell confronts Victorian Premier Jacinta Allen at her own press conference “Why don’t Australians have the right to protest in their own country?”.
The premiers security team go hands on, while Jacinta immediately flees her… pic.twitter.com/RYz2KVtCOi
— Chriscoveries (@Chriscoveries) September 1, 2025
Thomas Sewell talks to the media about his confrontation towards Jacinta Allen earlier today pic.twitter.com/QWgTPNex5M
— Veritas Vox (@veritas__vox) September 2, 2025
The shaved head and hail Australia sign off, is this guy are caricature working for the government or what?
Don’t be retarded
Sorry Cat, seems like Jed is probably right… take a look in the mirror with your comment.
Idiot
He would have been just as effective taking a plain Nationalist approach, but he has decided to incorporate ‘Nazi’ imagery and speech, to what end? He is just giving the Govt enough propaganda material to chill his movement and any other Nationalist movement from the everyday person that opposes mass immigration.
Many apologies Jed, your assumption was spot on.
😂. These politicians are utter filth.
They are far-left activists, not to be confused with politicians.
He’s absolutely bang on. We are all fed up with mass immigration. The politicians are sell outs and we will take the power back. They think they can bring in digital Id and impound and fine us all? Newsflash there’s more of us than them.
We will find ways of pushing back. They think they can escape? They will have to permanently move overseas like Jacinda.
👏
👍👏
This article is talking about Jacinda Adern
No. But the same sentiment applies
Can you see a difference?
“You managed to mention migrants, gays, Aboriginals and Jews but not Australians,” one critic noted.
That globalist puppets minders looked Jewish to me. Zionist minders for ministers tells you everything you need to know.
‘migrants, gays, Aboriginals and Jews’ are not Australians.
Anyone right of Stalin is now regarded as “far” Right.
It seems that there are two distict types of ‘Nazi’.
If anyone has taken a look at the state of Victoria’s hate speech laws, THEY, are something straight out of Hitlers playbook. You can even be arrested in the privacy of your own home, if someone overhears you say something that state of Victoria and its police goons, who have a track record for being the most trigger happy in Australia, don’t like.
Can you post your source of ‘Hitler plays’
Here are the Soviet Unions top 10. Do any look familiar?
Top 10 Soviet-Era Civilian-Directed Oppressive Laws/PoliciesArticle 58 of the RSFSR Penal Code (1927, expanded under Stalin) Description: Enacted in 1927 and expanded in the 1930s, Article 58 criminalized “counter-revolutionary activities,” a vague term encompassing dissent, criticism of the state, or even minor acts like telling anti-Soviet jokes.
Impact: Used to arrest millions during the Great Purge (1936–1938), with punishments including execution, imprisonment, or exile to Gulag labor camps.
Why Oppressive: Its broad and ambiguous wording allowed authorities to target anyone, fostering fear and suppressing free speech.
Decree on “Anti-Soviet Agitation and Propaganda” (1930s, formalized in Article 58-10) Description: This decree criminalized any speech, writing, or actions deemed to undermine Soviet ideology, including private conversations or possessing “subversive” literature.
Impact: Enabled mass arrests of intellectuals, writers, and ordinary citizens; sentences ranged from 5–25 years in the Gulag.
Why Oppressive: Effectively outlawed freedom of expression, creating a climate of self-censorship.
Decree on Collectivization and Dekulakization (1929–1933) Description: Stalin’s policies forced peasants into collective farms (kolkhozes) and targeted “kulaks” (allegedly wealthy peasants) for deportation, execution, or forced labor.
Impact: Led to millions of deaths (estimates range from 3–7 million) due to famine (e.g., Holodomor in Ukraine), forced displacement, and executions.
Why Oppressive: Destroyed rural communities, confiscated property, and caused widespread suffering.
Law on “Parasitism” (1961, Article 209 of the RSFSR Criminal Code) Description: Criminalized “living off unearned income” or refusing state-assigned work, targeting those who avoided socialist labor norms.
Impact: Used to persecute dissidents, artists, and intellectuals (e.g., poet Joseph Brodsky was convicted in 1964) with penalties like exile or forced labor.
Why Oppressive: Denied personal freedom to choose one’s lifestyle or occupation.
Decree on Internal Passports and Residence Permits (Propiska, 1932) Description: Required citizens to carry internal passports and obtain residence permits (propiska) to live in certain areas, especially cities.
Impact: Restricted movement, prevented rural-to-urban migration, and enabled state surveillance of citizens’ locations.
Why Oppressive: Limited freedom of movement and tied individuals to state-approved locations.
Decree on “Enemies of the People” (1930s) Description: A loosely defined legal category used to label anyone suspected of disloyalty, including family members of accused individuals.
Impact: Justified mass arrests, executions, and family separations during the Purges; children of “enemies” were often sent to orphanages.
Why Oppressive: Allowed guilt by association, targeting innocent relatives.
Law on Religious Associations (1929, revised 1975) Description: Restricted religious activities, banned unregistered religious groups, and limited worship to state-approved settings.
Impact: Closed churches, mosques, and synagogues; clergy and believers faced imprisonment or psychiatric confinement.
Why Oppressive: Suppressed freedom of religion, targeting spiritual and cultural expression.
Decree on “Hooliganism” (1940s, expanded in Article 206 of the 1960 Criminal Code) Description: Vaguely defined “hooliganism” as disruptive behavior, used to punish minor dissent or nonconformist lifestyles.
Impact: Enabled arrests for trivial acts (e.g., public gatherings or unconventional dress), with sentences up to 7 years.
Why Oppressive: Provided a pretext to target nonconformists and suppress individuality.
Decree on the Punishment of Family Members of Traitors (1935, Circular No. 00486) Description: Authorized the arrest and exile of spouses and children (as young as 15) of those convicted of “treason.”
Impact: Thousands of families were torn apart; wives and children faced exile to remote regions or labor camps.
Why Oppressive: Institutionalized collective punishment, targeting innocent relatives.
Censorship Laws and Glavlit (1922 onward) Description: The Main Administration for Literary and Publishing Affairs (Glavlit) controlled all media, banning unapproved publications, art, or music.
Impact: Suppressed dissident voices, banned works by authors like Solzhenitsyn, and enforced ideological conformity.
Why Oppressive: Eliminated freedom of the press and creative expression.
The behaviour of politicians like Allan is a clear indication of just how deep these mentally unstable people really are.
This one crys assault when faced with direct public questions to buy herself time, to excuse and deflect a genuine public concern and call it life threatening. An assault. Surrounded by an armed detail there is zero chance of any danger. Danger perhapps in her career prospects, her continuance of being a politician.
The amount of complete and utter nonsense that we are hear pouring out of the mouths of world politicians deserves direct and open condemnation from the public. Parliaments around the world, are a complete circus.
In recent events you couldn’t find a more deserving candidate than Starmer. The vast majority think his policies are nothing short of treason and absolute corruption. Locking up people for hurty words and ignoring rape complaints.
More and more people are becoming aware of the true reason why politicians make decisions that take away civil liberties, freedoms, privacy and rights. Unique id is to set up AI to know every detail about you. Track where you can go, what you can buy.
Discovering things like WW2 was more about kicking out a Jewish banking system and selling a nations production in german currency. That murdering 6 million jewish people was printed in a newspaper many years before ww2 and the numbers simply do not stack up. Russia selling oil and gas in rubles is another example of how to get your gas line destroyed and NATO on your doorstep.
Politicians are being run by the bankers. These guys say you are useless eaters. These guys are OK to lock you in prison, poison your food and water, make it impossible for countries to balance and get out of debt.
Turning to the destruction of the family unit. Redistribution of wealth from couples stopping children seeing one parent, destroying personal wealth is a sure way to wreck family bond and slow population growth. To set up circumstances in which fathers, mothers and children consider suicide for relief is insanely cruel.
Now its turning land and housing from assets into liabilities and taxing inheritance.
Asking a politician questions about all these things is a fundamental right.
Coming to New Zealand soon.
Where’s Pauline Hanson, Lt. Col. Ricardo Bosi or the Aussie Cossack for that matter?
Hanson has gained people in the Senate last election but you need to remember her and Bosi are up against a mainstream media, that is one of the most concentrated in the world and makes every effort, to shut they out of any political conversation.
Wait till people don’t question, but just act instead.
How is it possible that democracy consistently brings muppets like this woman into power? Everywhere, in Europe, Australia and here, all the politicians left and right wing are f***ing muppets. We would all be better off without them.
For decades, we’ve clung to the fairy tale that democracy— that hollow ritual of marking ballots every few years—holds the key to your salvation. We march in the streets, wave placards, chant slogans against the latest outrage, be it the influx of unassimilable migrants, the erosion of our liberties, or the betrayal by a political and bureaucratic and judicial class that serves foreign masters rather than the native soil. If only we vote harder next go, all will be righted.
Yet nothing changes. The government, that bloated parasite masquerading as your representative, laughs at your protests, arrests your dissenters, and accelerates the very policies designed to replace you. Why? Because voting and protesting are theatre, distractions engineered to dissipate our rage without threatening the true architecture of power.
I was considering to move to Australia but I’ve read too much about NGO’s there and the whole political landscape. This is the decider, what a disgusting woman and the Hate Laws coming in are harsh to say the least. I hope that somehow we can all come together to keep a lid on things here and stop bickering.
Yep, when words are scary, you hurt my feelings, off to the stockade you go for 6x months. These Ba,al Hats are really messed up in the head, whereas, Sowell is off to NZ like it or not, according to the Canaanite Controlled Main Fitch Media, Yet he is a duel Citizen, like thousands of other Kiwis, how is he a threat to anything? Has he a million supports, (not yet), so the slippery slope of no hope for us Goyim supposedly, continues as the Ba,al Hats race to Jan 2030 for their UN Agenda 21- 2030 bs. No Authority to do so, NONE. Yet the parasites continue with their GoyIM SLOP. The Great wReckoning is upon us, Prepare accordingly, PS don’t look for a fight, the Ba,al hats are bringing it to us.
OHH PLEASE woke looser.