What is the difference between reading studies published in scientific journals and listening to politicians, MSM, or government health experts?

Hello, if you are reading or listening to the Hatchard Report for the first time, it is possibly because someone has forwarded this message to you.

You may have received mRNA vaccinations against Covid-19 and are now starting to ask questions about its effectiveness and possibly also wondering about safety. 

I read and analyse scientific papers published in journals and I am increasingly concerned that our politicians, media, and health system are falling behind in their research. Here in New Zealand we are still on the receiving end of an unvaried diet of encouragement to vaccinate and treat the unvaccinated like the plague.

Mainstream media reacted with derision to a poll showing that 57% of us want unvaccinated health professionals to be allowed back to work. TV comments included:

“We need the staff, but I wouldn’t want a family member being treated by an unvaccinated nurse”

“For God’s sake take the jab, go back to work, take one for the team”

Just what are they expecting nurses to ‘take for the team’? A paper published on bioRxiv on 5th January 2023 is entitled “The SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein induces long-term transcriptional perturbations of mitochondrial metabolic genes, causes cardiac fibrosis, and reduces myocardial contractile in obese mice“. The authors conclude:

“Our data demonstrated that the Spike protein could induce long-term transcriptional suppression of mitochondria metabolic genes and cause cardiac fibrosis and myocardial contractile impairment”

In other words, long term heart damage, but that can’t be true, can it?—government experts have been reassuring us for years that vaccine induced myocarditis is mild and short lived. Think again. This study published in the journal of infectious diseases on 8th December 2022 entitled “Admission and follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings in BNT162b2 Vaccine-Related myocarditis in adolescents” followed the outcomes of nine young male patients with vaccine induced myopericarditis for 3 to 6 months. 100% of participants showed persistent myocardial scarring and/or regional myocardial fibrosis. 

It is worth noting that the journal sat on this study for six months following its submission, presumably afraid to rush the publication of research running against vaccine orthodoxy. These days this finding doesn’t stick out. Numerous carefully completed research papers are being published telling it how it is—mRNA vaccination causes long term heart damage. But you wouldn’t know it if you just watch the 6 o’clock news and glance at the daily papers.

Vaccine injury doesn’t just affect males. This study entitled “COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function”whose horrifying findings we have summarised before, published 30 December 2022 concludes:

“Pregnancy complications and menstrual abnormalities are significantly more frequent following COVID-19 vaccinations than Influenza vaccinations. A worldwide moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy is advised until randomized prospective trials document safety in pregnancy and long-term follow-up in offspring.”

And by the way, the complications referred to are not mild or without a social impact. Across the EU and around the world there has been, in highly vaccinated countries, a marked decline in birth rates. See here and here. 

So how come we don’t hear about this kind of data? Yesterday I was in contact with a former employee of one of our major news channels. Apparently all employees have to sign a non-disclosure agreement, included in this is a clause preventing them from revealing the Covid-19 editorial policy. Just remember many of NZ media outlets are owned by overseas interests who just may not have our kiwi health at heart, and in any case all of them are paid by the government.

Well surely the elected government has our interests at heart? Shocking analysis published this week on substack here and here has looked at freedom of information (OIA) documents released by the various government departments and CVTAG (the body of experts that gives vaccine advice to the government). The record shows that during and before August 2021, CVTAG had concerns about the risk of myocarditis among younger ages, but abruptly without explanation on 19 August Jacinda Ardern announced that all 12-15 years olds should receive it.

CVTAG continued to have concerns, undoubtedly because research findings of vaccine induced myocarditis were mounting up. The government decided to sail on regardless. In October 2021 an advertising campaign was launched targeting the young headlined with “Two Shots For Summer”. The media, by now funded directly by the government, loved it and called it edgy and needed. On 7th December CVTAG sent out its strongest memo yet advising that those aged under 18 should not be required to have two doses of vaccine under vaccine mandates.

The government didn’t tell us that, by then it was sailing away from scientific safety advice into the field of political strategy. Vaccination mandates were perceived as a vote winner by all the main political parties: Labour, National, Greens, and ACT. The die was cast and there was no going back. As studies have accumulated in 2022 showing that each successive vaccination or booster increases the risk of injury, politicians across the spectrum have kept silent. As all cause mortality has crept up, now running at 15% above the long term average, the silence has continued.

The figures have been kept from us because of a statistical trick. Ministry of Health analysts have kept asserting, against all evidence, that mRNA vaccination could only possibly have health effects for 21 days subsequent to vaccination. In other words a false assumption that there are no long term adverse effects of mRNA vaccination. Mathematician Igor Chudov has looked at official data from 29 EU countries for example and found a strong association between mortality and booster uptake. 

Dr. Clare Craig, formerly an NHS pathologist tweets:

“There seems to be a concerted denial that harm from injections can occur months after the last injection. Wilful blindness. There is plenty of evidence that harm can indeed occur months later.”

If you look back through my articles, you will see reports of a stream of concerning scientific papers coming out by the week and an increasing number of eminent scientists going public with their concerns. So why on earth in 2023 are the government continuing to be so wilfully blind to our interests? Possibly it is because of the way governments now work and how they acquire information. 

Jacinda Ardern will be following the World Economic Forum in Davos. No doubt she is eager to review the presentation tonight by Tony Blair, Helen Clark (former NZ PM), and Albert Bourla (CEO of Pfizer) entitled “100 Days To Outrace The Next Pandemic” whose content is advertised as follows: 

“Creating safe and effective vaccines in 100 days is estimated to give economies and societies a chance of containing the next outbreak before it spreads.”

It didn’t happen this time, and it won’t happen next, but if you walk the corridors of power, there is no alternative to a biotech vaccine future, adverse effects be damned. Albert Bourla will be laughing all the way to the bank and has been at our expense for two years. For our scientific view on the safety and effectiveness of biotechnology (or rather lack of it), visit https://GLOBE.GLOBAL. In a modern world it is beyond foolish to remain uninformed.

Image credit: CDC

Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food testing and safety company (now known as FoodChain ID). You can subscribe to his websites HatchardReport.com and GLOBE.GLOBAL for regular updates by email.

Guy is the author of ‘Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness’.