12 C
Auckland
Wednesday, June 29, 2022
- Free Advertisement -spot_img
-- Free Advertisement --spot_img
HomeWorldIntoxication ruled valid defense for violent crimes

Today's Top 10

Intoxication ruled valid defense for violent crimes

Canada intoxication defense news

Canada’s Supreme Court has axed a 1995 law that made such a defense illegal.

Defendants accused of violent crimes like murder and sexual assault may use self-induced extreme intoxication – known as “non-mental disorder automatism” – as a defense in a criminal court, Canada’s Supreme Court decided on Friday.

The court has ruled that a 1995 law that prohibited such a type of defense went against Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

“Its impact on the principles of fundamental justice is disproportionate to its overarching public benefits. It should therefore be declared unconstitutional and of no force or effect,” Justice Nicholas Kasirer pointed out.

The law violated the Charter because the defendant’s decision to become intoxicated doesn’t mean that he or she was planning to commit a violent offense, Kasirer explained. It also allowed courts to convict a person without having to prove any ill intentions, he added.

The issue came before the Supreme Court last autumn and pertained to three separate cases. One of them concerned David Sullivan from Calgary, who took a prescription drug known to cause psychosis in an attempt to commit suicide back in 2013, but ended up stabbing his mother, whom he believed to be an alien at that moment due to his psychotic state.

Sullivan was barred from using the defense of extreme intoxication, and was convicted of aggravated assault and assault with a weapon. But a Court of Appeals later found the law banning such a type of defense unconstitutional and acquitted the man on both counts.

Prosecutors appealed that ruling at the Supreme Court, which confirmed Sullivan’s acquittal with its decision on Friday. Canada’s justice minister David Lametti said that the government was thoroughly studying the ruling.

“It is critically important to emphasize that today’s decision does not apply to the vast majority of cases involving a person who commits a criminal offense while intoxicated,” Lametti pointed out in a statement.

Source:RT News

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please remember to keep comments respectful. We believe in free speech. Unfortunately, due the actions of one online troll, we have had to implement a manual moderation system to ensure online discussion remains civil and constructive. Your views and voice are important. Your comment will be published after moderation unless it contains hate speech or defamatory statements.

1 COMMENT

  1. Wokeness in Canada is getting to a stage of no bounds. Judiciary is getting corrupted slowly. Our hermit kingdom is somewhat similar to Canada in many aspects, including the current Jabcinda politics. A mentallu unstable person who threatened Jabcinda was punished heavily when others getting similar threats go unpunished. Max Key received threats more than Jabcinda and no action taken.. What happens in Canadata will repeat here because both Jabcinda and Justin Castro are agents of new world order.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Opinion

Daily Life

Wellington
broken clouds
10.7 ° C
11.2 °
9.4 °
95 %
4.6kmh
75 %
Tue
12 °
Wed
12 °
Thu
14 °
Fri
11 °
Sat
12 °
- Make Your Voice Heard -spot_img

Latest