Sergey Shoigu has cautioned Finland and the Baltic states against allowing Kiev to use their airspace for attacks on Russia.
Russia would have the right to retaliate if Finland and the Baltic states are deliberately allowing Ukrainian drones to pass through their airspace, Security Council Secretary Sergey Shoigu said on Thursday.
“Recently, there has been an increase in Ukrainian drone strikes against Russia via Finland, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia,” Shoigu told journalists. “As a result, civilians are suffering and significant damage is being caused to civilian infrastructure.”
Either Western air defenses are proving ineffective, or these four countries “deliberately provide their airspace, thereby becoming open accomplices in aggression against Russia,” he added. In the latter case, Moscow has the right to self-defense in response to an “armed attack” under Article 51 of the UN Charter, the security chief stressed.
In recent weeks, Kiev has intensified drone strikes on Russia in what Moscow has characterized as “terrorist attacks,” with the Russian military regularly reporting hundreds of UAVs downed in a single night.
Late last month, Kiev attacked Russia’s Baltic Sea ports of Ust-Luga and Primorsk with swarms of UAVs. The raids resulted in fires in both cities, which house extensive petrochemical infrastructure.
Kremlin aide Nikolay Patrushev said he believed that Finland and the Baltic states were “complicit in these crimes.” The provision of national airspace for Ukrainian drone strikes would “signify direct NATO participation” in attacks on Russia, he said Monday.
Multiple Ukrainian drones have also struck the territories of Finland and the three Baltic states since early March. Despite this, all four nations have avoided condemning Kiev outright for violating their airspace.
Moscow has formally warned Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia against allowing Ukraine to send drones via their territory, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said last week. “If the regimes in these countries are smart enough, they will listen. If not, then they will have to deal with the consequences,” she said.
How long ago did WW3 start?
February 2014.
I would say when they jabbed the world’s population with a bio weapon, depopulation “vaccine” in lockstep through their propaganda and fear campaign.
Exacerbated then, by the release of the Epstein files that proves the evil sickness of the intricate elaborate networks of the rich famous and elite.
@ Anon
Perhaps even earlier, as i think of the financial ” sub primes crisis” which did not come out of the blue and which was then followed by the Nordstream sabotage
Europe wants the crap bombing out of them.
It can’t get any clearer – we are definitely in WW3 https://southfront.press/nato-command-center-formed-in-ukraine-as-uk-pledges-120000-drones/
https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/component/content/article/flash-russia-says-being-attacked-by-drones-flying-in-from-finland-and-baltic-states-may-invoke-un-charter-article-51-self-defense?catid=17&Itemid=101
AND…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NnPzpuU5ao
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmStqCXIgio
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8DCQ5dKZ0M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGyfK6yHsbw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGS5Zx0F11Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQMUnc0CERE