Study of data from 1.5 million subjects in the US healthcare system reveals increased risk of blindness over two years following mRNA vaccination

Fortunately many people are waking up to a multi-billion dollar web of self-interest promoted by our government, the health establishment, the pharmaceutical/biotech industry and legacy media…. but not everyone.

True to form, the NZ Herald this morning leads with a lament, apparently only a minority of eligible New Zealanders have risked taking the bivalent vaccine.

In support of its call to vaccinate yet again the Herald article cites a study published by Cambridge University Press which looks at “Inequities in COVID-19 Omicron infections and hospitalisations for Māori and Pacific people in Te Manawa Taki Midland region, New Zealand”. A close look at the study reveals now familiar deficiencies that we have discussed in the pages of the Hatchard Report before:

• As expected, the definition of ‘unvaccinated’ is anyone who is actually unvaccinated + anyone who had a single dose. The paper should be tossed in the bin for this alone.
• The paper doesn’t specify whether or not they consider someone vaccinated in the first week after receiving their shot, but probably they are using MoH definitions which discard the crucial first week of data following mRNA vaccination thereby omitting adverse outcomes.
• Many people were admitted to hospital for causes unrelated to Covid between February and May,  but still tested positive. This factor was only removed in early July when they started filtering for unrelated morbidities.

• The study data time frame was February to June 2022. This was an interesting period. ‘Efficacy’ against Covid hospitalisation and mortality started in favour of boosters, but crossed over by May as the vaccine efficacy wore off and then entered negative territory. In other words, after May 2022 boosted individuals had a higher chance of Covid infection and death than the unvaccinated. The study would have got a very different set of results if they had considered May-September as well or instead.

If you take a broad sample of recently published research, it seems avoiding repeated Covid vaccination could be a very significant and safe choice. 

A very large and carefully specified study published in prestigious journal Nature of US healthcare data involving 1.5 million subjects has found that your risk of developing retinal vascular occlusion (RVO) doubles within the two years following Covid vaccination when compared to unvaccinated individuals (see here for a detailed explanation of the study findings by Dr. Mobeen Syed). 

The results are especially alarming because all categories of people whose health history and drug use might lead to a propensity to suffer from RVO were excluded from the study. The two groups of vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects were matched by age, sex, race, comorbidities, medications, and previous hospitalisation. In other words, the results point very clearly to a doubling of risk for those receiving mRNA vaccines.

The retina is the layer of tissue at the back of the inner eye that converts light images to nerve signals and sends them to the brain. Retinal vein occlusion is a blockage of the small veins that carry blood away from the retina. It is most often caused by the formation of a blood clot which blocks the flow of blood through the retina and causes severe damage to the blood vessels and the retina itself. 

RVO involves the loss of sight in the affected eye; in simple terms it leads to blindness. Many people suffering from RVO do regain some vision naturally. However, vision rarely returns to normal. There is no known intervention to reverse or open retinal vascular blockages. Older people are especially vulnerable to RVO, the same people our government and Te Whatu Ora are vigorously targeting to take another Covid shot.

It seems Te Whatu Ora is suffering from selective blindness itself. It is so keen to promote its vaccine uptake strategy, that it is not keeping up to date with the increasingly long list of concerning mRNA Covid vaccine adverse effect studies, and certainly not informing the public about these risks.

So what sort of blood clots develop as a result of mRNA vaccination and how do they form? Considering that the incidence of heart attacks and strokes has increased dramatically, you would think that funded research could prioritise research in this area, but in the post Covid vaccine era, you would of course be wrong. Everyone involved with promoting biotech vaccines is busy looking the other way. 

This article contains microscopy photos of unusual blood clots found in the arteries of suddenly deceased individuals. They contain relatively large fibrous, crystalline, and wire-like structures, not the cellular agglomerations of typical blood clots. These cannot normally be observed until autopsies are performed. Micro clots are another type of risk.

The RVO study suggests mechanisms for micro clot formation including molecular mimicry of the Spike-protein and/or heparin suppression. Heparin is the factor which prevents platelet aggregation or micro clotting. The retinal arteries and veins are unusual in as much as small pathogenic micro clots forming in the blood can be directly observed in the eye. Moreover their effects are immediately apparent to the patient and the treating physician. This opens a possible window into the study of the formation of blood clots following mRNA vaccination and their treatment.

Increasingly NZ government Covid policy looks blinkered, defensive, and deceptive. Last week, the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) released a tender for a major contract to provide ‘insights to build an empirical picture of the disinformation landscape.’ The newly appointed disinformation Tsar (at a cost of $450,000), whoever they are, will do well to look into the government itself. It might have become the principal source of misinformation in the nation. 

According to Mintel, which styles itself as the world’s leading Market Intelligence agency, 2023 is the year of “hyperfatigue”—a state of continual physical, emotional and mental exhaustion. In a recent UK survey, 35% of people said they were too tired to make healthy changes to their diet and activity levels, suggesting many are in a vicious circle of fatigue-induced self-sabotage, leading to more fatigue. 

Cancer Research UK, estimates that 40% of all cases of cancer could be avoided if more people lived healthier lives, for example by eating more healthily, being active, maintaining a normal weight, avoiding sunburn and not smoking, but we’re not taking their advice. Basically, we’re too tired to tackle our tiredness.

So what has made 2023 so unusually fatigued? Might it have something to do with an infectious disease almost certainly created in a laboratory possibly as part of a bioweapon development programme along with a misnamed vaccine, also created in a biolab, that doesn’t work and appears to make people sick? You tell me. 

There are an increasing number of unwell people suffering from conditions which studies show might be caused or complicated by mRNA vaccination, but the government is keeping quiet and relying on hyperfatigue and its own one source of truth doctrine to prevent people looking any deeper. We recently heard from a young acquaintance who informed us of their heart disease diagnosis. They remained not just uninformed of the possible cause, but also reassured by government advertising that Covid vaccines are safe. 

You don’t have to look very far for a cause these days. A Japanese paper published last week outlines the case of a man who developed myocarditis immediately after the administration of his fifth shot. Hospitalisations are at record levels, our health system is under siege, …..and winter is coming.

Image credit: Danish Ahmad