Right to Life asks why the majority of the churches in New Zealand, who should be at the forefront in defending the right to life of God’s precious infants, responded to the killing of 14,164 unborn children in 2022, and the wounding of their mothers with a deafening silence?
The murder of baby Ru in Lower Hutt has received major media coverage resulting in commendable public grief and outrage.
New Zealand has a child homicide problem. Information recently leaked from Oranga Tamariki (formerly Child Youth and Family) reveals that there have been 57 child homicides in New Zealand since this child protection agency commenced operations in 2017.
Each of these children who were murdered were God’s precious infants, made in His image and likeness, unique and unrepeatable miracles of His loving creation.
We should be very concerned about the violence inflicted on these innocent and defenceless children. If we are really serious about opposing violence against born children, then we must also be opposed to violence being inflicted on unborn children.
Violence against children commences in the womb.
Should we be surprised, if we as a nation permit the killing of more than 14,000 unborn children every year as so-called “health care?”
If we allow the violent killing of children in the womb by poisoning, being sucked out of the womb or being violently dismembered, how can we then say that we are opposed to violence and murder against born children?
The murder of unborn children in New Zealand is authorised and funded by the state and promoted as health care. The government seeks to suppress all dissent on the murder of the unborn. The government is opposed to any discussion in Parliament or in the community on the murder of the unborn as this is “settled law.”
The secular media supports the government in suppressing the continuing public debate on the murder of the unborn.
The abortion statistics for New Zealand for 2022 were released last week, it was reported that there were 14,164 defenceless unborn children killed in 2022.
Right to Life asks if the news media can treat the murder of baby Ru with substantial coverage, then why does the murder of 14,164 unborn children not rate any mention and is completely ignored?
If you are pro life, like you pretend to be, then provide shelters and means of subsistance for woman/ families at least for 5 years until the child goes to school.
It make me so angry this ” vertue signalling” while women are left to fend for themselve in most of the cases
People are poor, therefore unborn babies have to die 🤦🏼
A life in poverty is still a life. Death is NOT a life. It’s better to be alive and poor than dead. Offer anyone on their deathbed 20 more years and they’d take it regardless of what their bank balance would be.
I don’t know where and when this kind of defeatist thinking started, but it’s annoying. If you’re worried about not having enough money saved up for your retirement, are you going to go ahead and kill yourself now because “oh well, I’m gonna be so poor I might as well 🤷🏼♂️”. Of course not.
For the vast majority of human history people were dirt poor, it’s only in the last 100 years or so that people in western countries have lived to high-standards. We never stopped having children because of it.
I was one four kids on a single parent’s salary, it was hard but at least nobody ended my life so they could save a buck. Jesus.
Maybe people should take some personal responsibility and not go around banging everything that moves? Maybe it’s up to the parent to provide shelter and subsistence to their children and not the responsibility of other people? Maybe life is filled with hardship, but it’s up to each of us to answer when we’re called upon to steward a new soul through this life? Maybe everything shouldn’t always be easy, maybe we find our deepest strength when we’re facing our biggest challenges? Maybe THAT’S better than crumbling in a heap of “I can’t do this” before the challenge has even begun?
Killing unborn babies in the womb is evil, it isn’t “virtue signalling” to oppose it. Virtue signalling is screaming how hard done by you are, declaring that no one is allowed to question your decisions and demanding that someone else take away the consequences of your own choices. And BTW there are ALREADY plenty of shelters, resources etc that are available to women in need, if the baby killing establishment would stop censoring, deplatforming and “de-amplifying” them, maybe more women would know that.
Have you ever taken care of children all by yourself ? From birth to adulthood ?
That is caring for shelter, food etc. without any support ?
Many women have to.
And if many women have to, it is because the father does not care about the kids, mister “selfrightous”.
Yea, killing baby in the womb is ” evil”.
Better keep your pr**k in you trousers
Now now, calling me “selfrightous” doesn’t make anything I said above incorrect. And FYI I actually HAVE raised an abandoned child from the time she was 4 days old (she’s 23 now). Best thing I ever did in my whole life. Very expensive yes, but I’d rather have her in my life than all the money in the world.
And I actually DO keep it in my trousers, wish to God more men would. And I AGREE with you 100% that many women struggle because a lot of men are bloody useless and cowardly these days. It’s a damn shame. But still not a good enough reason to kill babies in the womb.
https://substack.com/@sashalatypova/note/c-43553078?r=1u575z
this is much more worrying than abortion !!!
https://slaynews.com/news/ob-gyn-testifies-congress-alarming-miscarriage-spike-among-vaxxed-women/
All organic life is precious, if only we knew it.