A top medical researcher, Dr. Tess Lawrie, has sounded a warning to the world about the WHO’s proposed ‘Pandemic Treaty.’
Dr. Lawrie is a director of The Evidence-Based Medical Consultancy Ltd. Her peer-reviewed publications have received in excess of 3,000 citations and her ResearchGate score is among the top 5% of ResearchGate members.
Writing on her Substack, Lawrie describes how she attended an audio-visual link with WHO to make a verbal submission on the Pandemic Treaty. She says notice of the WHO’s ‘public participation process’ was only two days for video submissions, and five days for written ones.
She was granted two minutes to speak. When she tuned in there were 48 others on the call at the time, most of whom were from NGOs associated or connected with the WHO or UN, including 16 WHO staff.
Some participants were advocating:
- Fast-tracked 100 day development of new vaccines.
- Fast-tracked approval of diagnostics.
Lawrie noted that during the consultation process, the WHO would have received only 70-100 video submissions. Most of these presenters were asking for more, not fewer powers.
The powers sought by WHO under the proposed treaty are significant. Where a pandemic has been declared (and the WHO decides what is and what isn’t a pandemic), the WHO ‘could impose lockdowns, testing regimes, enforce medical interventions, dictate all public health practice, and much more.’
The prospect of so much power being vested in an unelected, undemocratic body, with no accountability is horrifying, according to Lawrie, as we have seen during the COVID crisis. She says:
‘Over the course of this pandemic, the WHO has withheld safe and established older medicines, ignored the experiences of frontline doctors, disregarded evidence from low, middle and high-income countries, and taken no heed of the values and preferences of people affected by their recommendations. It has apparently ignored the huge numbers of adverse reactions on its own database and has failed to issue warnings about the gene-based vaccines. It has also advertised that the mRNA vaccines are as safe as normal vaccines – and this is simply not the case.’
Lawrie says it is vital that people spread the word about the treaty, and ‘push back’ against it – ‘we can’t let them get away with this power grab’, she said.
READ MORE: Global Medical Tyranny – Proposed treaty will give WHO complete control over all future pandemics
Once again for the record: anyone (ANYONE) attempting to forcibly pierce my or my children’s skin with a piece of metal, their celebrity eggspurts, global treaties and hastily scribbled new laws notwithstanding, will be responded to in kind.
We are all thoroughly fed up with this bullshit.
Leave us alone.
Trump was right about WHO
Would ‘that woman’ who graduated from Klaus,s class for future fascist World dictators sign? Yes. Would that ‘Woke Cuck’ who graduated from Blackrocks corporate (this isn’t a f***ing democracy) class for CEO,s sign? Yes. As would the Greens and that Incel at ACT as well.
Dr Lawrie
To late the stable door has already been opened and the horse has bolted …. awhile ago!!!
Perhaps if you have some guts you would have got up and said this TWO years ago when it was RELEVANT!!
Methinks a case of covering your A**!!!
@Vsracer The Pandemic Treaty proposal of the WHO is less than 1 year old!