HomeNewsGuy Hatchard: How the globalists keep little New Zealand in line

Popular Now

Guy Hatchard
Guy Hatchardhttps://hatchardreport.com/
Guy Hatchard PhD is a statistician and former senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food safety testing and certification laboratory. Guy's book 'Your DNA Diet' is available on Amazon.com.

Guy Hatchard: How the globalists keep little New Zealand in line

Globalism news

A Conspiracy of Silence and a Litany of Lies Part 2

Yesterday I wrote about the High Court decision rejecting a petition questioning child mRNA vaccinations. Last night I was able to read the full judgement in detail which was something of a revelation.

Justice Gendall wrote (Clause 54) that he thought the government’s approval of child mRNA vaccinations was reasonable because:

“…earlier, all pharmaceutical regulators from Australia, United Kingdom, United States, Europe, Singapore and Canada reached the same conclusion on all the expert evidence before them to approve the Paediatric Vaccine in their jurisdictions.”

Perhaps Justice Gendall was unaware that Medsafe is a member of the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities, as are all the other regulators in the countries he mentions. In fact ICMRA has forty members. It is a non-governmental organisation heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical industry and the World Health Organisation.

ICMRA members closely coordinate through a shared database which means that most of the medicines regulatory authorities around the world have used the same ICMRA-supplied information templates to reach their decisions—information co-created by pro-pharmaceutical funded sources.

Even our government may be unaware just how much influence the pharmaceutical industry has on our Ministry of Health decisions through the back door of ICMRA.

Globalists are anxious to control little people in New Zealand and stave off any original and constructive thoughts they might entertain. Control of information is a vital part of the process. Our government has uncritically facilitated this.

In fact the very computers that we often think are setting us free are actually also tools of global control. Databases and AI systems can rigidly control what lands on the desks of compliant and complacent minds sitting in government offices.

There are many philosophical elements and indeed myths contributing to a global takeover strategy:

  • The decline in original writing and thought and long format reading, which has been supplanted by cutting, pasting, and sharing imposed ideas.
  • The idea that there are infallible global sources of information and authority; which runs parallel to the cult of international personalities and wealth.
  • The rejection and suppression of anything natural because it can’t be patented, along with legal mechanisms to monopolise patents.
  • The rejection of the role of subjective, intuitive, and cultural knowledge in favour of solely objectivised mechanical concepts; which silently reject the quantum mechanical self-referral nature discovered by modern physics.
  • The decline in individual and national self-sufficiency. Essential items in every country are now made overseas and controlled by global capital, leaving every nation vulnerable to decisions they cannot influence.

The acceptance and proliferation of these and many other ideas has been gradual, almost imperceptible. The growth of computer controlled mechanisation has led to a great deal of comfort, but it has also led to the loss of a great many personal skills.

Globalists would like us to define ourselves through which machines we own, what medicines we take, what global brands we wear and consume. All of which are monetised.

Overwhelmed with this object-referral concept of reality, we have forgotten just how powerful our own mind is. The ancient health system of India, Ayurveda, defines this forgetting as the essential source of disease—becoming disconnected from who you really are, referred to as the ‘mistake of the intellect’.

This mistake includes relinquishing authentication of ideas and truth to third party ‘authorities’. Thus Justice Gendal was able to delegate and bypass a thorough assessment of safety research. He ruled:

Clause 42 “I need to say at the outset that, as I see the position, it is not the role of this Court on judicial review to decide which experts are right, nor to form its own opinion on the desirability of the Paediatric Vaccine being supplied in New Zealand. [that he said is the role of government experts].

The judge responded to evidence as follows:

Clause 62 “The applicants in their submissions raise numerous concerns regarding the safety of the Paediatric Vaccine, pointing to what they contend are adverse event reports following vaccination…

He continued: “the rate of vaccine-induced myocarditis across all age groups appears to be very low, being about 30 per million in New Zealand [a ridiculously low figure supplied by the Ministry of Health without any evidence to corroborate it. See this study, the measured real world risk is as much as 10,000 times higher]. 

He continued: “That risk, too, is substantially lower for children [also unsubstantiated by definitive evidence, but accepted by the judge on the authority of the MoH]”,

Clause 63 “… there is no real-world evidence that exists to demonstrate these are actual risks of the vaccine ….[thus naively accepting the MoH’s ridiculous assertion that temporal association can be ignored and discounted when assessing causality] 

Clause 64 “This Court has also rejected claims that …. the absence of longer-term safety data was a cause for concern.”

Since when did courts believe that the longer term safety of children should not be their legitimate concern? In all this, we seem to have forgotten that we are dealing with human life. The loss of a life cannot be reduced to a mere statistic. 

Nothing illustrates the direction this sort of thinking can take more than the evolution of euthanasia laws. In Canada, which arguably has the world’s most permissive laws, people with disabilities and treatable conditions like hearing loss or mental health issues are being permitted to end their lives. 

There is some suggestion that doctors have acted improperly to encourage the vulnerable and even the young to end their own lives. It is just a small step to realising that people suffering medical misadventure or side effects such as those caused by genetic experiments could be euthanized, all paid for by the government.

Today Stuff newspaper, with a documentary entitled Beyond the Fringe (a title shared by a popular BBC radio comedy show), has sought once again to demonise the voices questioning the safety of mRNA vaccination. According to Stuff, their aim is nothing less than a plot to make New Zealand ungovernable (???).

To bolster its case, Stuff describes a local councillor’s suggestion that the Pfizer mRNA vaccine is an experimental drug as “a frequently made, but inaccurate claim.” An appalling and laughable criticism of a simple truth.

Stuff might do well to investigate the strange case of the disappearing CDC claims about safety. In the most recent version of CDC advice about mRNA vaccine safety, the section entitled “The mRNA and the spike protein do not last long in the body” has been quietly removed. 

Multiple research findings indicate that the spike protein is both very toxic and very persistent following mRNA vaccination—a safety busting revelation. No doubt the CDC removed the offending paragraph in order to avoid falling foul of the punitive American courts.

In addition, on 11 August the CDC completely back tracked on pandemic quarantine measures:

  • Those exposed to the virus are no longer required to quarantine
  • Unvaccinated now have the same guidance as vaccinated people
  • Students can stay in class after being exposed to the virus
  • It is no longer recommended to screen those without symptoms

In other words the pandemic is over, except in isolated New Zealand and Australia where the courts and mainstream media are determined to back extensive and misguided government restrictions to the hilt.

I want to finish here with the view from Sweden (and all the Nordic nations). They do not share the views of the New Zealand courts about forcing pandemic measures on our children. They rejoice that they have escaped such excesses and harmful mistakes. After the latest myopic court ruling in New Zealand, you might find this article refreshing, entitled Sacrificing Children’s health in the name of Health.

Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a food testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID). Website: HatchardReport.com.

Guy is the author of ‘Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness’.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of DTNZ.

Promoted Content

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please keep comments respectful, civil and constructive. Moderation times can vary from a few minutes to a few hours, depending on staffing levels.


  1. Remarkable timing.. the CDC rescind much of their previous position, thereby refuting much of their previous advice.
    The court judgement follows rapidly, before any such change of playing field can be ingested.

  2. Thanks Guy. I went to stuff (i try to avoid normally) to see if I could see who made these claims about the vaccine and which local councillor it was.

    All they really need to do is some very simple research:


    Note the February 2024 date was originally May 2023. So yah, very much still experimental, still in trial. Of course I have told this to people until I am blue in the face but they still insist it’s ‘approved’. Even when presented with the actual document they still claim it’s fake or not true such is the cognitive dissonance.

    So we now seem to have redefined the meaning of vaccines, democracy, trial, safe and effective.

    If I knew who the stuff reporter was I would forward the link above to them and see what they have to say about the safety of a substance that is still in trial.

    • I just watched Stuff’s hilarious clunky propaganda hit-piece on the NZ’s ‘anti-vaxxers’ and their ‘dangerous disinformation’.

      It’s now called ‘Fire and Fury’, I guess ‘Beyond the Fringe’ didn’t quite sound terrifying enough.


      Predictably it’s pushing the tried and tested ‘extremist domestic terrorism’ fear angle, including the obligatory hackneyed scary looking visuals and spooky music.

      Great to see ‘the powers that be’ and their mealy-mouthed MSM propagandists are getting slightly nervous.

    • I agree. It’s highly suspicious that the CDC in the USA changed the definition of vaccination in August 2021, just as the ‘efficacy failure was first becoming apparent.

      Before the change, the definition for “vaccination” read, “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Now, the word “immunity” has been switched to “protection.” Orwellian and shady.

      Obviously Stuff didn’t report on that either.

    • I wouldn’t bother forwarding to Stuff. I have been sending relevant and important information to a senior editor and manager (yes you Anna) of that well-named media outlet of up to date, non-biased, haha, independent, hahaha, open-minded hahahaha journalism and reporting since the Parliament protest began…

      Nothing, nada, not a peep, apart from the odd text saying “… go away I see enough of this already.”. “Not interested…”

      They really don’t care what you and I, or anyone thinks, about this, or anything else for that matter. As far as I am concerned they can get “stuffed” and when the revolution comes I have their phone number…. ????????????????

  3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-IBzTqNQy4



    Pastor Barry Smith (see above links) explains many things – in particular is how New Zealand and Australia are often test subjects for the new world order. Eg New Zealand we’re the first to get eft pos cards. Have a look at the world economic forum- who is the Artificial Intelligence Pilot country? YOU guessed it – New Zealand.


    Our government is USING us to experiment on for their masters at WEF, IMF and UN.


  4. Disgraceful and ignorant to have believed these court engines could not care a damn for our precious children….
    and since when did lawyers and court officials turn into doctors….perhaps a new type that has recently popped up?
    Perhaps that was why I got thrown out of gmail after sending my concerns regarding the harm on children etc regarding this issue..oh well I can still read your column
    Respect to you Dr Hatchard

  5. I think its safe to say we must look after ourselves, we can not rely on what are essentially extensions of government to protect us.

  6. This is why Firearms Licensing is being delayed by up to two years!!!
    Jabcinda and her Zio-Communist NWO / WEF prostitutes fear an armed uprising.
    The Globalists especially fear a minor party becoming a major party, thus displacing the usual NWO Labour / Nazional ‘choices’ and their minor Zio-Communist ilks of the Green Party (Green has been the ‘New (Communist) Red’ for a number of years now).
    ACT talks a good game, but look at their end results…! (ie not being present for a Firearms vote, endorsing the deadly untested and no trials Covid-19 vaccine bio-weapon, and serving the Zionist Hidden Hands of Epsom…).
    IF such a minor party (ie the O&FP) were to take a majority vote displacing both globalist political parties in New Zealand, you can bet that the voting results would be cancelled, and Operation Katipo would go kinetic!

  7. Why being an independent country when we can simply look at what other countries are doing and just trusting their judgment … What’s the point of having a nation, when it will follow the step of others?

  8. NZ is a illiberal democracy run by agents and lies. One of the colonies of US which is a modified form of the old dominion of UK. We are not soveriegn when it comes to international relationships, finances and managing assets, etc. If directed, we have to obey.

    • At least now there is a potential alternative in the form of the BRICS+ trading bloc, which appears to be genuinely committed to letting participating countries retain their sovereignty. Which strikes me as much preferable to being, in effect, a vassal state of the Western empire.

      Unfortunately it seems that it is the rich and powerful who gain the most from the current arrangements, so any change is likely to be stubbornly resisted. But at least there is a genuine alternative, and that’s a start.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here



clear sky
18.9 ° C
18.9 °
18.8 °
74 %
0 %
19 °
18 °
17 °
17 °
14 °
- Free Advertisement -spot_img