U.S. researchers say COVID jab was a ‘targeted experiment’

A new analysis by an interdisciplinary team of researchers in the United States has reignited global debate over the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, claiming it was not a public-health measure but a “targeted and internationally coordinated genetic engineering mass experiment” conducted with military assistance.

The team’s findings, which have been mapped across 12,000 batch numbers and stored on the blockchain, assert that the Covid jab lots were deliberately formulated in three distinct tiers with dramatically different effects.

The data, they say, shows a clear, non-random pattern of distribution designed to avoid triggering obvious statistical alarms while inflicting harm on specific populations.

According to the analysis:

• Batch numbers ending in 20A to 20F contained nearly zero side effects and are described as saline placebos — essentially “water with a label.”
• Batch numbers ending in 21K to 21X produced moderate side effects, including fatigue, myocarditis, and blood clots, with hospitalization rates reportedly 300% above baseline.
• Batch numbers ending in 22R to 22Z are labeled catastrophic, linked to strokes, cardiac arrest, neurological damage, and death rates 8,100% above the historical norm for any pharmaceutical product.

The researchers insist there was “no random variation” and “no manufacturing inconsistency.” Instead, they describe an intentional, systematic pattern in which the most dangerous batches were disproportionately shipped to specific zip codes — areas with high concentrations of military veterans, first responders, independent contractors, and communities known for historically low compliance with federal mandates.

Moderate batches were routed to urban centres with high media consumption, while placebo batches allegedly went to politicians, media figures, and pharmaceutical executives — the very people who publicly promoted the shots as “safe and effective.”

The former FDA regulator who worked on the team reportedly submitted the full dataset to a military tribunal with the statement: “This was not negligence. This was a weapons deployment protocol, disguised as public health.”

The claims have drawn fresh attention to stark differences in excess mortality between European nations.

Eurostat data analysed by German researcher Tom Lausen reportedly shows persistently high excess mortality in Germany despite vaccination rates comparable to those in other countries.

In contrast, Sweden — which joined NATO in 2024 — recorded exactly zero excess mortality over the same period.The team’s source material was first highlighted in a widely circulated post on X by user @paulgoldeagle, which detailed the batch-number mapping and its implications.

Critics have yet to respond publicly to the latest dataset, but the researchers maintain that the evidence is now irrefutable and permanently recorded.

The full report and blockchain-stored batch data are expected to fuel ongoing scrutiny of the largest medical intervention in history.

Weshalb ist bei gleicher Spritzenzahl die Übersterblichkeit in Deutschland sehr hoch und beim neuen NATO-Mitglied Schweden gleich null?

Die Spritzen-Pandemie war ein gezieltes und international verabredetes gentechnischen Massenexperiment mit Hilfe des Militärs.
Was wir von… pic.twitter.com/4DGjl9S6PN

— Wolfgang Wodarg (@wodarg) June 3, 2026

Image credit: Maksim Goncharenok