11 C
Auckland
Tuesday, May 13, 2025

Popular Now

UK supreme court rules on definition of ‘woman’

A campaign group in Scotland had challenged the government’s attempts to allow transgender individuals into roles reserved for women.

The UK Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that the term “woman” refers to biological sex, not gender identity, meaning that transgender individuals who were born male are not legally considered women for the purposes of single-sex protections.

The ruling comes after the For Women Scotland rights campaign challenged a Scottish Government law aimed at increasing the number of women on public boards, which included transgender women with legal recognition as female.

The group claimed this violated the UK-wide Equality Act 2010 – a law that protects people from discrimination based on characteristics like sex, race, and disability. They asked the UK Supreme Court to confirm that “woman” in the Act means biological female, not someone assigned female status through a gender recognition certificate.

In its judgment, the court stated that “the terms ‘women’ and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex,” adding that interpreting sex to include acquired gender “would lead to incoherence” in provisions protecting women on the basis of pregnancy, maternity, and other sex-specific criteria.

A government spokesperson, responding to the judgment, stated that the ruling “brings clarity and confidence, for women and service providers such as hospitals, refuges, and sports clubs.” The spokesperson added that “single-sex spaces are protected in law and will always be protected by this government.”

Lord Hodge, one of the presiding justices, also noted that the court did not view the ruling as “a triumph” of one group over another and that it was simply necessary to provide legal clarity on the meaning of terms in existing legislation.

British author J.K. Rowling, one of the most prominent supporters of For Women Scotland, also hailed the court’s ruling.

“It took three extraordinary, tenacious Scottish women with an army behind them to get this case heard by the Supreme Court and, in winning, they’ve protected the rights of women and girls across the UK,” the writer said on X.

Some, however, have criticized the Supreme Court’s decision, claiming it could reduce legal recognition for transgender people. The Scottish Greens issued a statement slamming the ruling, calling it “deeply concerning for human rights.” LGBTQ+ charity Stonewall also expressed “deep concern at the widespread implications” of the move.

Promoted Content

Source:RT News

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please keep comments respectful, civil and constructive. Moderation times can vary from a few minutes to a few hours. Comments may also be scanned periodically by Artificial Intelligence to eliminate trolls and spam.

17 COMMENTS

  1. It took the UK Supreme Court to determine something so simple and obvious? Because of the fake definitions imposed and entrenched for far too long by idiot politicians on ordinary people? What a colossal and stupid waste of taxpayer funds. Hopefully the idiot politicians won’t need to redefine what two plus three might equal.

  2. What is to become of the boys and young men who have been convinced they were born into the wrong body? What punishment, what law is there to address the none reversible harm, that cutting up of their sex organs? Who were the doctors, teachers, psychologists, doctors and surgeons?

    Send them all to El Salvador prison.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtnFVqIl1Kc

    • Courts need to promote constant conflict to enable the judges, lawyers, shrinks, social workers etc to make more $$. So there will be an appeal against the Supreme Court, then another appeal, then yet another court case. Lots of gravy on the gravy train.

  3. Does little to reverse the Fascistic woke-ism that’s poisoned the UK. The insane hate speech laws that see creepy virtue cops, pestering an arresting nice ordinary people for free speech remains.

  4. Runs parallel to the same court declaration as in the U.S. 2 weeks ago…
    Western Governments always do mandates, edicts and law changes parallel and identical to one another.
    Can we see the globalist patterns of governance and behaviours???

  5. Amazing.

    It only took 5 years for the UK legal system to decide that ‘a woman is a woman, and a man is not a woman’.

    Nice work if you can get it.

  6. Huh, so men aren’t actually women.

    Gosh, who knew.

    Welcome to woke-retarded-idiotic-indocrinated-moronic-clown-world.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest

Trending

Sport

Daily Life

Opinion

Wellington
scattered clouds
14.3 ° C
14.3 °
14.3 °
82 %
8.7kmh
26 %
Mon
14 °
Tue
15 °
Wed
13 °
Thu
14 °
Fri
16 °