15.6 C
Thursday, June 20, 2024

Popular Now

Guy Hatchard
Guy Hatchardhttps://hatchardreport.com/
Guy Hatchard PhD is a statistician and former senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food safety testing and certification laboratory. Guy's book 'Your DNA Diet' is available on Amazon.com.

The Long Essential Read: The Dam is Breaking—The Biotech Bubble is Bursting

COVID vaccine studies opinion

For the last couple of years the Hatchard Report has been asking the government and the medical establishment to compare the health outcomes of the vaccinated with the unvaccinated.

There has been a wall of silence. Along with many others publishing, we have tried to breakthrough to influence decision-makers with little obvious success up till now. 

If you have been reading our reports you will know that the issue is very serious indeed. Excess deaths, hospitalisations, chronic illness, cancers and workplace absenteeism due to sickness and disability have all risen to record levels, but most of those in authority have been stone-walling this data. 

Late last week the dam began to break with a little trickle of regret, following the news that a former Japanese Minister for Internal Affairs Kazuhiro Haraguchi had apologised directly to the citizenry for Covid-19 vaccine campaigns at a rally, and openly acknowledged that the tidal wave of sudden deaths presently occurring among the Japanese population is almost entirely of the Covid vaccinated group. Google is already trying to suppress and discredit even this note of apology.

Then, as we reported yesterday, the New York Times admitted that the evidence that Covid came from a Lab in Wuhan is overwhelming. Saying:

“It is undeniable that U.S. federal funding helped to build an unprecedented collection of SARS-like viruses at the Wuhan institute, as well as contributing to research that enhanced them.”

Now the prestigious British Medical Journal has published an article “Excess mortality across countries in the Western World since the COVID-19 pandemic: ‘Our World in Data’ estimates of January 2020 to December 2022” which reports:

“The highest number of excess deaths was reported: 1 ,256 ,942 excess deaths (P-score 13.8%) in 2021, the year in which both containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines were used to address virus spread and infection…..and continued high (808,392) in 2022, when most containment measures were lifted and COVID-19 vaccines were continued…..This raises serious concerns. Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate underlying causes of persistent excess mortality.”

This in itself is not unique a few other scientific papers have made the same suggestion, but what was unique is the response of the UK Daily Telegraph who headlined “Covid vaccination may have helped fuel rise in excess deaths—Experts call for more research into side effects and possible links to mortality rates“. The dam has broken. The link between Covid vaccination and excess mortality is no longer a taboo subject.

We are one step ahead of the media here at the Hatchard Report. If both Covid and Covid vaccines are killing millions of people and still doing so, why aren’t they banned? If both Covid and Covid vaccines are products of biotechnology experimentation why isn’t it banned. Yesterday we published The International Genetic Charter which calls for just that. You can view and sign up to support the charter at GLOBE.

New Zealand mainstream media frequently reprint articles from the UK Daily Telegraph. Will they have the courage to reprint the latest bombshell news from mainstream science, or will they continue their weak and implausible excuses for the current wave of heart disease, cancers, strokes and neurological illness swamping our health system, as it is among all highly vaccinated nations?

New Zealand media is not alone in their lack of in-depth analysis. The UK Daily Mail says sleep after a tipple of alcohol while airborne can be fatal and fumes “why eating one chip is like smoking a cigarette”. It also blames low fibre diets for a sudden surge in colon cancers. The NYPost agrees as it reports “Colorectal cancer is rising rapidly among young adults“. It also reports that a staggering 61% of US adults will have cardiovascular disease by 2050 if current accelerating trends continue, and by way of explanation it offers: “becoming a father might be bad for your heart“.

The scientific issue here should be obvious. If something suddenly starts to accelerate you have to look for explanations that don’t simply refer to prior established behaviours. People have been tippling on planes, fathering children, falling asleep and eating to much sugar for centuries, this can’t account for a sudden precipitous rise in excess deaths. This is the essence of scientific thinking, and thank God that some scientists are waking up.

Covid vaccination increases your risk of dying from Covid.

A paper published in Frontiers in Immunology originating in Ohio, USA is entitled “Brief research report: impact of vaccination on antibody responses and mortality from severe COVID-19”.  

The study looks at the outcomes of 152 adults hospitalised with Acute Renal Failure (ARF) at Ohio State University hospital.  ARF is a common problem in intensive care units and typically results in mortality rates between 50% to 80%. Of the patients, 112 had severe Covid and 40 did not have Covid. The study reports significantly higher death rates among the Covid vaccinated (p=0.002). It also found higher levels of IGg4 antibodies among the vaccinated, indicative of increased immune tolerance (impaired immune system efficiency).

The non-vaccinated Covid positive ARF patients had a mortality rate of 37%, but the vaccinated Covid patients had a rate of 70% almost twice that of the unvaccinated. In a masterly use of understatement, the authors concluded:

“These results suggest that among hospitalised patients, prior vaccination may not always be indicative of protection against mortality.”

It is results like these that are starting to raise eyebrows among those working in frontline medical services and research. Dr. Mikolaj Raszek, a genomist working in biosynthesis, is a case in point. Dr. Raszek, who has his own company Merogenomics in Canada, blogs on YouTube. Early on in the pandemic, Raszek sat on the fence and wondered how effective Covid vaccines would be. He has now changed his tone completely to one of deep concern. You can watch him analyse the above paper at this link.

Dr. Raszek reports he is in contact with a number of scientific colleagues who quietly share his concerns. One of them informed Raszek of a paper published way back before the pandemic in 2012 entitled “Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus“.

SARS Cov 1 was a severe virus that emerged in China in 2002 and was eventually contained. To this day no one knows where it came from. Because of a concern about a reemergence or a deliberate release of the SARS coronavirus, vaccine development was initiated around that time. The results of this study are concerning: it found that when a prototype Covid vaccine was administered to rodents they developed severe pulmonary disease. The authors warned in their conclusion:

“Mice administered any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting that hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.

You can imagine how I felt yesterday while reviewing this paper. Eight years before the Covid-19 pandemic, scientists knew about the risk of an accidental or deliberate release of a new version of SARS Cov 1 and they also knew that the disease had an unusual feature: vaccines made the symptoms worse.

Yet somehow biotechnologists in both the West and East decided to initiate gain of function research which developed more virulent types of coronavirus. Upon its escape from a lab, they forced the widespread use of a range of novel biotech Covid vaccines on the public following minimal and obviously inadequate safety testing as though we were a bunch of rats to be experimented on while mad people tried to play God. Given what was already known to science, none of this makes any sense unless there were much darker motivations somewhere in play.

Dr. Raczek is not alone in the pursuit of scientific reality. Dr. Willian Makis, a New Zealand surgeon working in a provincial hospital blogged on Substack a couple of days ago under the title “Confessions of a New Zealand Surgeon”. Check it out. He reports the absolute chaos in our health system due to the surge in illness which he and some of his colleagues relate to vaccine induced immune deficiency.

It doesn’t stop there. An in-depth analysis by Dr. Ursula Edgington compared 2020 with 2023 and found that NZ Dept of Transport staff suffered 188% more sick days, 130% more unpaid leave days and a 85% increase in bereavement leave. 

Problems are not confined to the Health Service and our transport system, the NZ Herald reports “Schools hit by wave of winter illnesses, worsening teacher shortage” but fails to connect this with Covid vaccines. 

More and more invasive medicines and vaccines are in the pipeline

Unbelievably, the attitude of governments and regulators has stiffened back towards mandatory compliance. And to cap it all, the World Health Organisation wants to directly control the health policy of governments around the world. It appears to be all drifting out of our control into the hands of big pharma and their adherents, as excess deaths continue.

You can see the problem can’t you? So far we seem to have been whistling in the wind, but as the dam is breaking it is more important than ever to speak up and share the information. It can’t be allowed tot happen again. If we give in and forget the struggle, we will not be able to return to any semblance of pre-covid normality. 

The goal posts have changed, we need to set them back to original values. During the pandemic people were trained through media appearances and 24/7 coverage not to ask questions. As a result, everyday medical consultations are now planned to involve the use of biotechnology along with the inherent serious risks but without informing the public what they are. The adverse effects and huge costs are on us, and the profits lie with the providers.

You don’t have to look very far away to appreciate what is being designed for us. An article in the UK Daily Telegraph is entitled “How Ozempic became the new wonder drug”. It gets right to the point in the first paragraph with a quote from a nutritionist speaking at a recent conference: “Semaglutide [the active ingredient in Ozempic] should be put in the water supply”. 

The comment was supposedly in jest, but a couple of paragraphs later we find that a trial of semaglutide (GLP-1) on people with a Body Mass Index (BMI) higher than 27, who are therefore at risk of cardiovascular disease, led to reductions in weight. As a result Dr Riyaz Somani, a consultant cardiologist at University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, said: “The implications are huge and are likely to lead to changes in current practice.” For this, read: soon to be prescribed routinely and widely along with a coercive approach on the part of the health service.

Semaglutide is administered through weekly injections whereby it directly interacts with GLP-1 receptors in the brain reducing appetite. An EU conference entitled Select very recently discussed the use of semaglutide to treat not just obesity but also Alzheimers, Parkinson’s, mental illness, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and you name it.

The problem lies in the range of side effects, they are extensive, long term and serious as we have discussed in previous articles. My point here is not to bang the same old drum of alarm but to point out that few if any decision makers are listening. So what should we do and who will listen?

The effects of gene editing are not containable. 

The products of biotechnology experimentation can affect everyone indiscriminately, spread without limit and blight succeeding generations. They cannot be recalled. Yet the urge to play God among the original promoters of biotechnology and the obscene pursuit of profit among the commercial arm of biotech has been so powerful that any sense of caution has been deliberately abandoned.

I am reminded of that iconic scene in Ripley Scott’s 1979 movie Alien when Sigourney Weaver asks Ian Holm, playing the part of the chief scientific officer, why did he break with established protocol and let the infected crew member into the ship, endangering everyone? Holm replies that he took an executive decision even though according to protocol it wasn’t his to take. 

Pre-pandemic, even the death of one participant in a vaccine trial would have been enough to raise red flags. Now the post-pandemic authorities are devoid of any wisdom of hindsight, the commercial biotech juggernaut is barreling ahead with little or no regard for public safety.  

Our response is The International Genetic Charter which sets a benchmark not just for those of us who are determined to avoid the unfolding biotechnology catastrophe, but for humankind as a whole. For very good and scientific reasons we want to rebuild a life free of biotechnology experimentation. It is a statement of need and intent. It is short and to the point. Please read it and sign up your support. It will just take a couple of minutes of your time. You can circulate it to your friends and colleagues. This should no longer be a taboo subject. Scientific journals and some mainstream papers have began to admit the facts and the implications for public policy and accountability. Write to your MP and demand protection from biotechnology experimentation.

Image credit: Usman Yousaf

Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food testing and safety company (now known as FoodChain ID). You can subscribe to his websites HatchardReport.com and GLOBE.GLOBAL for regular updates by email.

He is the author of ‘Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness’.

Promoted Content

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please keep comments respectful, civil and constructive. Moderation times can vary from a few minutes to a few hours. Comments may also be scanned periodically by Artificial Intelligence to eliminate trolls and spam.


  1. Thanks Guy for this very informative article.
    I am somewhat perplexed by the lack of transparency of reporting of Immunological impacts of vaccinations and the associated tests that prove causality. There is a vast range of Immunological tests that could prove / disprove abnormal immune responses but where are the transparent case reviews and publications from the Immunologists in New Zealand?
    How is a patient appropriately diagnosed and treated?
    Many of the vaccine supplier fact sheets across the board contain information relating to rare side effects including Cardiovascular, Musculoskeletal, Neurological, Skin, Connective Tissue disorders etc (that is five specialist medical fields) and the tip of the iceberg, but very rarely is there reference to the adaptive /innate immune system response. (Immunology) According to publications like An Introduction to Immunology and Immunopathology, there is claim of a great deal of synergy between the adaptive immune system and its innate counterpart, and defects in either system that can provoke illness or disease, such as inappropriate inflammation, autoimmune diseases, immunodeficiency disorders and hypersensitivity reactions. Who is monitoring this?
    Can patients in New Zealand be tested for IgG subclass and immune deficiencies or has this been blindsided for many, many decades and limited to Immunologist Specialist only testing?
    Does a patient have a right to understand their individual immunological responses to vaccinations and what help is available to those who are adversely impacted, specifically when there is no Immunology services in the area?
    We know vaccines can affect individuals in unexpected ways, as proven by the Medsafe reporting from inception of the Covid vaccination programme (until reporting ceased) and then through publication of Pfizer’s adverse reaction report, but who was monitoring this? CARM, Medsafe, HDC, Health Quality Safety Commission, IMAC, hospital ED’s ? as we are yet to see any publication in New Zealand that gives comfort that the issues were/ are being appropriately addressed. I question what explanation patients are being given for their newly diagnosed conditions, if any.
    I wonder who in New Zealand would now dare to compare the data of the vaccinated with the unvaccinated?


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here




Daily Life


few clouds
12.6 ° C
12.8 °
10.6 °
72 %
20 %
13 °
12 °
12 °
12 °
12 °