The team currently organising the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19 have misleadingly and mistakenly linked their publicity to a wholehearted endorsement of Covid vaccines.
A 30 second YouTube video with 331,000 views entitled “Look back to move forward – Royal Commission of Inquiry into COVID-19 Lessons Learned” is paired with New Zealand Government material promoting Covid vaccination.
The video, set to music, depicts joyous family scenes of people working from home and celebrating in their gardens and living rooms. It encourages people to share their stories as a means of moving forward and bonding.
If you click the link below the video offering more information, you are taken to this Health New Zealand website which encourages Covid vaccination from 6 months old and up. It also promotes new Pfizer booster shots, masking, and antiviral medication. It describes side effects from the Covid vaccines as rare, despite the fact that reports of adverse effects subsequent to Covid vaccination dwarf any previously reported vaccination side effects by a huge factor.
If you are viewing the video on a smart TV, a runner advises you to click on the title of the video for more information. When you do so, it gives you a series of options, the first of which takes you to a QR code which links to the same Health New Zealand pro-Covid vaccine information.
The comments section below the video is turned off. Clearly the Royal Commission organisers don’t want us to be able to make public comments accessible to others or hold online conversations around the topic. They want to control the flow of information. The video turns up frequently as an advertisement on YouTube which interrupts your viewing. In essence, it manipulates the viewer towards a feel good framework and creates a bland narrative that obfuscates the issues.
Crucially, it doesn’t initiate a public discussion of key concerns. For example the New Zealand Bill of Rights guarantees the right to refuse medical treatment and experimentation. It also guarantees freedom of thought, conscience, religion, and particularly expression. All of these rights were curtailed during the pandemic as the government set them aside and instead instituted vaccine mandates and lockdowns which were enforced by police action, threats of criminal prosecution and actual loss of employment. Moreover the government censored discussion on social media platforms.
None of these crucial issues which require widespread social discussion and consideration are being directly raised by the Inquiry publicity.
There is no suggestion in the video that the Royal Commission is intended to respond to concerns or that its terms of reference need revising, rather it leaves you with the impression that the Inquiry process is all about picking the approach that the government will adopt during the next pandemic (referred to as “whatever comes next”). The implication of the Health New Zealand link is that this will be a simple process of choosing from among the past and current official Covid policies.
Clearly there is a suspicion that those organising the Inquiry have already made up their minds what comes next and are just going through the motions without offering a clear idea of the huge issues at stake affecting not just health and the right to life but also social cohesion, employment rights, freedom of expression, the economy, and full disclosure of vital information.
The bias evident in this video underlines the need to completely revise the scope and personnel of the current Inquiry which was set up with very limited terms of reference by the previous government. The web address which leads to the actual process of making a submission on the terms of reference of the Inquiry at Covid19Inquiry.nz occupies a corner of the screen for just five seconds at the end of the video and is not actually directly linked. In other words you have to copy it down and enter it into your device as a separate process, whereas a direct link to the Health New Zealand pro-Covid vaccine information is available throughout the 30 seconds of the video as a website link and as a QR code.
The Royal Commission of Inquiry should be a process of restoring public trust, this cannot happen until a public dialogue is instituted. As we have repeatedly reported, the Covid years have been marked by a health crisis involving record rates of hospitalisation and death which are still continuing whose causes are little understood and hardly investigated. If the public are not trusted, but rather manipulated we are in for more of the same, perhaps worse.
Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food testing and safety company (now known as FoodChain ID). You can subscribe to his websites HatchardReport.com and GLOBE.GLOBAL for regular updates by email.
He is the author of ‘Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness’.
Deception upon manipulation upon lies upon desperation.
Each merely provides more evidence of guilt.
Such severe fraud which has resulted in mass deaths, injuries and subsequent collapse surely deserves the death penalty.
The evidence is now quite clear and the players are known.
These players are now known criminals.
They are also being defended and protected by the media, police and judiciary as they all join together to sing the globalist anthems.
This injustice is now becoming obvious to all.
How long before the people speak?
Corruption is like an aggressive cancer it keeps spreading down the line. When those at the top are bribed enough it dribbles down to the minions the lowly and they are all kept in line to the tune of the narrative. The bribed MSM are a disgrace to their profession participating in and promoting a criminal enterprise. Bring on Nuremberg 2. At Nuremberg 1 they hanged all the Media that pushed the propaganda as well. But oh how the world has changed since 1946. We have certainly been dumbed down there is just no fortitude in Govts. anymore. There are no moral values either if criminals want to make money and people or populations stand in their way they just kill them.
Yes. Sneaky, insidious, deceptive.
As another current article reminds us, they can make “science” say whatever they want it to say. From now on we should always put science in quotation marks. I don’t look at the results any more. I look at who has done the “research”. Yes. More quotation marks
“The comments section below the video is turned off…”
Utter weaselly cowards 😄
Fake and spineless. Their “inquiry” is about as meaningful as the Oscars.
Shut up and go away – the truth of what happened is already all out there online. Stick your fake revisions of history where the sun don’t shine
The NZ covid cover up (inquiry) is another mask (pun intended). The more we focus on the games they play the more power we give the game. I do not consent is a powerful stance, when no one plays the Govt/WEF/Cabal/Mafia game the rulemakers are left in their small pack becoming increasingly exposed
Wise words. Thank you Waison.
Wise words.
Thank you Waison
Excellent article. Thank you Guy.