22.6 C
Auckland
Friday, December 13, 2024

Popular Now

NZ National Statement to the UN General Assembly – ‘The Spirit of San Francisco’, full text

NZ - UN news
Image – UN Web TV.

Mr. President

Nearly four score years ago, nations exhausted from a cataclysmic World War came together in San Francisco to create the United Nations Charter. Forged in the immediate aftermath of that war, then New Zealand Prime Minister Peter Fraser held “the greatest hopes” for the Charter’s success, which he believed would be predicated on the “sincerity and moral determination” of its members.

But the beginning is a delicate time, and Fraser was also a realist. He understood the Charter was imperfect. From the earliest debates in San Francisco, New Zealand fought against the veto rights bestowed upon the Great Powers.

Fraser warned that “The veto which can be exercised by one of the Great Powers both in regard to itself and other nations is unfair and indefensible and may, if retained and exercised, be destructive not only of the main purposes of the international organization, but of the institution itself.”

Fraser knew that the United Nations Charter could only be secured with the Great Powers’ agreement. And though he considered the Charter imperfect, he thought those imperfections could “be overcome if the spirit of San Francisco is carried into the operation of the Charter.”

The spirit of San Francisco incorporated the hope that the Great Powers behave prudently, for as Winston Churchill said, “The price of greatness is responsibility.”

But today the spirit that created the United Nations Charter is sagging under the weight of its own potted history. Power waxes and wanes so yesterday’s ‘Great Powers’, today’s Permanent Members of the Security Council, are challenged by periods of competition or worse, abuse of the veto.

This has serious implications for all states and the conduct of our foreign affairs. While some Permanent Members exercise restraint in their use of the veto, others consistently and frequently abuse this power.

When Russia, a permanent member of the Security Council, illegally invaded its neighbour, it did not just violate Article 2, paragraph 4 of the Charter, it acted in utter contempt of the Charter.

Russia then vetoed a draft Security Council resolution condemning its actions and calling for the immediate withdrawal of its forces from Ukraine. Not only does Russia lack the sincerity and moral determination required to make the United Nations work, but its delinquency should be a clarion call for long overdue Security Council reform.

As Prime Minister Fraser said back in 1946, when referring to the veto’s risks, “it is very bad if one nation can hold up the advancement of mankind.”

The world of 2024 looks very unlike the one of 1945, and so our collective institutions need to evolve and reflect contemporary realities. We need a UN Security Council that looks more like today’s world, and we need veto reform.

Tensions and imbalances – between the desire for a rules-based international order that protects small states against aggression, and the unjustified exercise of power by certain Great Powers – have only grown these past eight decades.

Yet small states matter now as much as they did then. New Zealand holds the foundational belief that all states are equal and that our voices matter as much as the more powerful states represented here. It is the quality of our arguments and the principles of justice that inform them, not the size of our militaries, that should hold sway here.

We smaller nations face many of the same challenges and share the same concerns. As my colleague from Singapore, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, put it at this year’s East Asia Summit Foreign Ministers Meeting in Laos:

“The problem for us is that every small state that wants territorial integrity to be respected, that wants its political independence to be guarded, that depends on the UN Charter to plan long-term, must view an invasion of a smaller neigbour by a larger neighbour…as a full-frontal point of anxiety.”

We agree. We small states need today’s superpowers to talk more, seek better understanding between them, and develop ways of compromising more. Rather than a zero-sum game, effecting better relations between today’s “Great Powers” only enhances global stability, and that is what we smaller nations seek.

The regional and global challenges we face are stark, the worst the world has faced since World War II. Those challenges are complex and daunting.

Across the globe, armed conflict is once more on the rise; hard fought development gains are being reversed, human rights challenged and eroded, and geostrategic tensions are threatening global security and stability.

Growing distrust and division is making international cooperation more difficult, placing the United Nations under strain, and hindering the organisation’s ability to find effective solutions.

The world is facing a myriad of regional and global crises. We see multiple, intersecting, and mutually reinforcing crises of conflict, climate change, and increasingly, a crisis of trust in our institutions. So the challenges we face in the General Assembly are stark, the worst in several generations.

They also reinforce the truism that the global geostrategic and security challenges faced in one era do not remain static. The world has changed, and so must we.

Indeed, each generation of decision-makers confronts new challenges as economies, demographics, technologies, and societies evolve, as do the power calculations that accompany disruptive change.

Old truths give way to new ones. The trick now, as it was then, is to have one’s eyes wide open about the fundamental shifts that are taking place and be nimble enough to adapt to them.

The need to adapt to changing historical contexts is also incumbent on the United Nations and its organisations. The rise of mini-lateral agreements is one sign of countries increasingly working together outside of the United Nations. Another is the sclerosis around necessary veto reform.

In the 10 months since returning for a third time as New Zealand’s Foreign Minister, we have spoken widely with colleagues across the globe. Summing up those discussions in a recent speech in Tokyo, we said that never has it been more apparent just how much diplomacy and the tools of statecraft matter in our troubled world.

And since war and instability is everyone’s calamity, diplomacy is the business of us all. We observed that at this moment in time the ability to talk with, rather than at, each other has never been more needed.

Those who share our values, and even those who do not, gain from understanding each other’s position, even when we cannot agree. From understanding comes opportunity and from diplomacy comes compromise, the building block of better relations between nations. We need more diplomacy, more engagement, more compromise.

As Churchill also said in his later years, “meeting jaw to jaw is better than war.”

Never has it been more apparent just how much political leadership is required to respond to the international challenges we face. Leadership is needed to restore trust in our domestic and international institutions, forge unity, and fill the gaps when the international community, through the United Nations, proves unable to.

What does that leadership look like?

It is leadership that can discern future opportunity while understanding but not being trapped by historical constraints. It is leadership that is underpinned by a leader’s strength of character – their courage, their purpose, and a commitment to educate, not dominate their citizens.

Given he will turn 100 in the next few days, we recall with admiration such leadership, exhibited by then President Jimmy Carter in 1978, in concert with Egypt’s President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. They talked for 11 straight days at Camp David, from which emerged the Middle East Peace Accords between Egypt and Israel.

That peace has endured, and New Zealand is proud as a foundational member of the Multinational Force and Observers to have supported that peace since 1982.

The Accords reveal what is possible when leaders exhibit sincerity and moral determination, imbued by the spirit of San Francisco. We need more of this type of leadership and responsibility.

Contrast that leadership with the catastrophic and ruinous path that has been followed in Gaza. This misery was caused by both Hamas’ monstrous terrorist attacks last year and the now overwhelming nature of Israel’s response. We are most concerned about the generational consequences of this level of suffering and violence, with no end in sight and which sees us on the precipice of an even wider conflict.

Where is the sincerity and moral determination of today’s leaders at the vortex of this unacceptable violence?

New Zealand has sacrificed many of its young men to wars in faraway lands. Fully 10 percent of the total population of New Zealand fought in the Great War, and we lost a fifth of them. So every year, on the 25th of April, we commemorate their loss at Gallipoli, the site of terrible carnage.

This year in a dawn address we recalled that despite the horror of war on the Gallipoli Peninsula, fraternal bonds were forged between warring nations, countries who were once enemies became friends.

New Zealand never wants to experience the catastrophe of another World War. There must never be another San Francisco conference picking up the pieces after another descent into global annihilation and human suffering.

So we must do more. Demand more. And deliver more.

We must reject and resist those who seek to conquer and control.

We must always seek the path of peace because the lasting victories of humanity are those of peace, not war.

Finally, despite our frustration at the lack of political will required to adapt this organisation to fully meet the challenges of today, New Zealand’s support for the United Nations remains unwavering. That commitment is unchanged from when Prime Minister Fraser expressed his great hopes for the Charter eight decades ago.

We believe effective multilateral diplomacy means taking responsibility for our obligations as member states. So, to that end, we announce today New Zealand’s intention, as a voice for small states, to campaign for a seat on the Security Council for the 2039-40 term.

That intention is supported by our enduring hope:

  • that the spirit of San Francisco can be reclaimed through the sincerity and moral determination of our diplomatic efforts;
  • that we can all do better, and;
  • that it reinforces our enduring support for the United Nations and the cause of peace.

Promoted Content

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please keep comments respectful, civil and constructive. Moderation times can vary from a few minutes to a few hours. Comments may also be scanned periodically by Artificial Intelligence to eliminate trolls and spam.

9 COMMENTS

  1. Yes thanks Winnie. We get it. This govt like the last will back the US establishment. An establishment who engineered the proxy war in Ukraine, that has cost hundreds of thousands their lives, destroyed families, killed animals and done significant damage to the environment. All so the cynical US establishment can make a quick buck.

    You certainly don’t speak for this New Zealander. I’ll never vote for your party or any of your coalition partners. Oh and same goes for you Labour/Greens.

  2. The less we have to do with this international globalist criminal mafia, the better.

    This speech isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on.

  3. A shame that Winston Peters played to the Five Eyes gallery, the most belligerent countries in the world. Where is our independent, nuclear-free policy in this talk at the UN? The Ukraine war, which was blatantly provoked by the US, UK and EU countries could have ended in April 2022, with a peace deal arranged in Turkey between Russia and Ukraine. But the US and UK advised Ukraine to continue the war and sent more and more weapons. Victoria Nuland, former US ‘diplomat,’ famed for her “f the EU” comment, while organizing a violent coup in Ukraine in 2014, now admits there was a peace deal in 2022. See Victoria Nuland Admits US Discouraged Ukraine From Signing Peace Deal With Russia in 2022 – News From Antiwar.com 9/9/2024 – Kay

  4. Give it a rest Winnie!

    Your rules based international order sent 100 missiles into Syria on fabrications of the white helmets. The white helmets funded by western institutions and countries. And you backed the US, UK and France. What made you back their version of events?

    How many vetoes has the US cast protecting the IDF?

    Where is the justice for the Iraq invasion by the US and the UK based on lies?

    How many vetoes were cast by them around that invasion?

    Why do the rules based order turn a blind eye to the US occupying and stealing Syrias oil and occupying their arable land?

  5. On September 13, United Nations member states completed the 4th draft of the Pact for the Future document which is expected to be signed this weekend at the Summit of the Future in New York City. With the Summit set to begin on Sunday, and “Action Days” for the Summit beginning Friday, the public is unlikely to see the final version of the document before it is signed by all 193 member states of the UN.

    The Summit of the Future is taking place during the 79th session of the annual UN General Assembly. The summit has been in the making since at least 2022 after repeated calls by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to shift financial resources to rapidly complete the Agenda 2030 goals set by the UN in 2015.

    Did you sign us up Peters? Where you a good little globalist puppet for the UN Bolsheviks? When are you going to tell we the people of New Zealand what our corporate state government has done?

  6. Winnie runs with the hares and hunts with the hounds
    He knows where the votes lie and which ground to cultivate
    Churchill the hero of Dresden
    Peters signed New Zealand into the controversial UN Migration Compact putting a leg into bed for unmittigated uncontrolled migration
    Antoinette James says Peters was involved in the Christchurch cleanup
    Made woke safe for sheeple consumption
    How many Kiwi’s know WW1 was prolonged for two unnecessary years with Germany being funded supplied and armed through the fake Belgian Relief Fund in order to allow her to keep fighting?
    At the end of the day Winnie is a what-not who I would never trust nor confide in

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest

Trending

Sport

Daily Life

Opinion

Wellington
clear sky
22.8 ° C
22.8 °
22.8 °
60 %
10.8kmh
5 %
Fri
21 °
Sat
19 °
Sun
19 °
Mon
15 °
Tue
15 °