Decoding the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Indoctrinating your children into the new “Fake Sustainable” World Order

Many of the UN SD goals ‘sound like’ worthy ideals’, for example, who could argue against the goal of eliminating poverty from the world?

In this article I attempt to decode the true meaning behind the deceptive marketing language of the UN Sustainable Development goals (SDGs).

The UN SDGs can be a bit tricky to decode, certainly with all the weaponized buzz words they use. Many of these goals maybe unattainable, but for the global elite, the point isn’t to improve the world, the point is to control it, and control you. Of course, the cost of this deceptive ‘planetary utopia’ is handing over control of all planetary resources to the unelected dictators at the UN, for alleged ‘conservation’.

Real Environmentalism Was Hijacked by Deceptive UN Political Schemes

In a previous article initially published in February 2023 titled ‘1500 scientists say ‘Climate Change Not Due to Co2’ – The real environment movement was hijacked’ I provided evidences and testimonies from renowned international climate scientists that contradict the UN assertion that climate change is caused by CO2 emissions.

I also referred to the conclusion of 1500 climate scientists and climate professionals at the Climate Intelligence Foundation (CLINTEL) that the climate changes naturally and slowly in its own cycle, and that solar activity is the dominant factor in climate; and that CO2 emissions or methane from livestock, such as cows, are not the dominant factors in climate change. This is comprehensively detailed in the books Transcending the Climate Change Deception Toward Real Sustainability and in the book Climate CO2 Hoax. Furthermore, the number of signatories of the CLINTEL declaration has now increased to 1860.

The UN climate change, sustainable development and green economy policies over the past 30 years are little more than worldwide marketing tricks that have tragically brainwashed two generations of people who do not understand what the UN actually is, and who is it is really designed to serve.

The word “sustainable” was hijacked decades ago, and it is now deceptively used to advance the agendas of globalist mega-corporate interests who couldn’t care less about the environment.

The aim is to catapult humanity into the arms of UN Agenda 2030 and other deceptive marketing plans entirely aligned with the objectives of the so-called financial elites of the World Economic Forum (WEF) Davos group. UN Agenda 2030 is not about real environmentalism it is all to scare people into accepting totalitarian authority and limitations to their freedom and personal wellbeing.

What the UN really means by ‘sustainable development’ is population control, central planning, global governance, and education to indoctrinate your children into a new set of beliefs in preparation for the new fake “sustainable” world order.

The ‘real sustainability’ movement was hijacked by the deceptive UN political schemes of sustainable development and the ideology of man-made climate change as evidenced in this article including video testimony by whistleblower George Hunt.

Note also that UN-defined sustainable development actually endorses the unjust debt-money banking and flawed globalisation / hypergrowth economic system; and that over the past 30 years of UN-defined sustainable development has not solved the real environmental and human wellbeing problems that do exist worldwide. UN-defined sustainable development is, and always has been, a false narrative operating under cover of continued environmentally destructive globalisation. Sustainable development is not real sustainability at all – it is a political and economic scheme that has detracted from what real environmentalism is.

Part of the problem is globalisation does not distinguish between what could be termed ‘good growth’ and ‘bad environmentally and socially destructive growth’.

Any type of growth will do for the international money-masters for without GDP growth their entire system of monetary trickery collapses. Thus, globalisation has been the vehicle that enabled decades of interest payments in which trillions continuously flowed to the privately-owned mega-banks of the world, regardless of whether the ‘economy’ was expanding or contracting. The mega-banks pulling the strings of the economy are always the winners in the numerous boom-bust-bailout scenarios that have beset the governments of the world.

For decades, there have been serious detrimental environmental and societal consequences from the debt-money banking and globalisation / hypergrowth economic paradigm. The financial winner in that paradigm has been the financial orthodoxy of private-bankers.

Everyone else has been left on a treadmill of debt, compelled to join the ‘rat race’ or the ‘hamster wheel’ to pay interest on debt-money that private bankers created from nothing. There is never enough money in the system to pay the interest on the ever-increasing debt, thus the entire system is a scam. It has been akin to a sadistic game of musical chairs in which everyone is scrambling for a seat, whilst private bankers sit on the throne of the world’s money-creation process. From their unelected office of money-creation, the worldwide private banking system has for decades been bleeding an estimated 35% of the entire profit of the nations of the world via the mechanisms of debt-money, interest, and government taxation (much of which goes to pay interest on national debts).

The private-banking sector creates vast amounts of debt-money out of thin air and lends it worldwide at interest. Control of this mechanism enabled the private banking sector to expand or contract the economy at will and create boom-bust-bailout cycles in which the bankers were always the winners, at the expense of the environment and the general population. These orchestrated cycles are explained in my book Demonic Economics. Hypergrowth resulted in real environmental destruction and pollution. No UN policy ever mentions this or attempts to reform the privately-owned debt-money system, which is at the root of the world’s real environmental and human wellbeing problems.

The UN did not challenge globalisation, in fact, it represented globalisation and for decades has been part of the machinery of globalisation; and the political schemes and ideologies of the mega-corporate WEF Davos group.

UN politically-defined ‘sustainable development’ has been an illusory ‘greenwashing’ of the current flawed system, thereby temporarily perpetuating a system that will ultimately fail due to its unsustainable, “eco-cidal”, and human welfare diminishing effects.

UN Agenda 2030 involves a plan to get all people off the land and into so-called smart towns and smart cities, where they will be monitored, tracked and traced; forced to comply with new rules to access digital social credits; and be unable to grow much food. This is also detailed in the World Economic Forum ‘Great Reset’ document.

Free creative people are not meant to be pent up or corralled in cities like cattle in a pen, or controlled by an unelected UN and government-corporate partnerships, but that is what UN Agenda 2030 attempts to do.

Real sustainability would involve developing self-sufficiency in the localities and regions, and an entire reworking of the education system to re-establish truth, as well as material, health, and spiritual knowledge for thriving networks and human wellbeing.

This is in contrast to the systems of the so-called globalised economy or the corporation-serving, technocratic futures the WEF, UN, and government bureaucrats have planned for us. Real sustainability would be unhindered by debt-money banking and never-ending taxation, in which much of the taxes goes directly to the international mega-banks and financial institutions that have the unearned privilege of creating money.

“The slogan of the UN Agenda 21, to protect the rights of future generations and all species against the potential crimes of the present, is both a smokescreen and a declaration of entitlement. By standing on this high-sounding platform the rights of the individual are called selfish and those who would fight for them slurred as immoral.” – Rosa Koire, Author

Environmentalists and green politicians that enthusiastically endorse UN Agenda 2030 policies have yet to navigate their way out of UN marketing propaganda and the bogus science of manmade climate change. If they realised what the UN actually is, and the ‘real’ agenda, they would surely not support Agenda 2030.

“UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world… Moreover, people should be rounded up off the land and packed into human settlements, or islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation (where they can be surveilled and controlled)…

UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is a global plan that is implemented locally. Over 600 cities in the U.S. are members… The costs are paid by taxpayers….. Although counties say that they support agricultural uses, eating locally produced food, farmer’s markets, etc, in fact there are so many regulations restricting water and land use (there are scenic corridors, inland rural corridors, baylands corridors, area plans, specific plans, redevelopment plans, huge fees, fines) that farmers are losing their lands altogether…

The push is for people to get off of the land, become more dependent, come into the cities…

The plan is to restrict your choices, limit your funds, narrow your freedoms, and take away your voice… ” – Rosa Koire, Author.

Decoding the Real Objectives Behind the UN 17 ‘New Sustainable Development Goals’

“The 2030 agenda is comparable to chasing imaginary giraffes, and epitomizes the collective movement as it calls upon individuals to set aside their ambitions, to forfeit their natural rights, and to subjugate themselves to the state – presumably in the interest of 17 lofty goals, that incidentally position the goal creators to anoint themselves as your caretaker and keeper…

The 2030 agenda poses a real threat to life as you know it, as the United Nations’ purported attempts to secure the peace and provide for domestic tranquility and equality for all is intoxicating because it plays on Maslows instinctive human need for security above all other desires… when faced with threats… free people will willingly cast off their freedoms and embrace tyranny, if only their new keepers can assure them safety. That is what the United Nations, in my opinion, is attempting to accomplish in its 2030 Agenda…. To the ill-informed… the (17) goals are a beacon of hope. But to the critical thinkers and freedom lovers… they are the all-embracing and tyrannical arms of the nanny state – guided by a coven of elites who will never live by the restricted standards and forfeited rights they impose on its willing subjects” – Ron Taylor, Author

Let us take a closer look at the SDGs:

Goal 1: End poverty in all its forms everywhere

Translation:

Keep the developing world in vast debt under the pretext of economic development, globalisation and ‘technology transfer programs’ that are marketed with the illusory goal of ending poverty.

The disastrous effect of such policies has actually been to increase debt and poverty in the so-called developing world, this is described in my book Transcending the Climate Change Deception Toward Real Sustainability.

Centralized banking, IMF, World Bank, Federal Reserve to continue to control all world finances. The so-called financial powers that be (PTB) will only cancel world debt (on money they created from nothing) when they can introduce their digital one world currency, social credit system and cashless society, ensuring people must conform to their rules.

Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture 2.5 By 2020, maintain the genetic diversity of seeds, cultivated plants and farmed and domesticated animals and their related wild species, including through soundly managed and diversified seed and plant banks at the national, regional and international levels, and promote access to and fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising for the utilisation of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge, as internationally agreed.

Translation:

Rampant expansion of GMO, and no local control of seed banks. “as internationally agreed” means mega-corporate control of genetic resources.

In contrast to centuries past when people had shared use of the commons, in modern times virtually everything has been privatised and nothing is available to, or owned by, the people. Shared use of the commons is no longer the case for the land and water of the world, nature, seeds, and the sky (the airwaves). Even life itself is being privatised, via the advent of patenting and bio-piracy of genes, foods, plants, animals, biodiversity and resources of nature, and life-forms – including pathogens, genetic markers, and viruses. In almost all cases, you will find it owned by corporations. Whereas, all these natural resources used to be called the commons and were shared and used by everyone.

Major pesticide and GMO mega-corporations include BASF, Bayer Dupont, Dow Chemical, Monsanto, and Syngenta.

They own a vast number of seed, pesticide and biotech companies. Monsanto was responsible for the introduction of GM crops and toxic chemicals, such as aspartame, DDT, Agent Orange, petroleum-based fertilisers, rGBH, glyphosate, and more. In addition, the godless corporate practice of patenting nature itself is carried out by such companies.

It has displaced thousands of years of traditional agriculture and farmers’ rights. The World Trade Organisation’s Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) has facilitated the granting of patents to all genetic material, including seeds, plants, and animals.

“By May 2002, there were 1,457 biotechnology companies in the US with a total value of $224 billion…. consolidation is acute, 70% of patents on staple food crops are held by six multinational corporations who can set the market price for them and block competition for 20 years, thereby monopolizing the market… The developing world, where 75% of people’s livelihoods depend on agriculture, is the source of 90% of all biological resources. Yet transnational companies based in the developed countries hold 97% of global patents…. patenting of life goes against the sharing of knowledge and the preservation of biodiversity and culture” – Dr Sahadeva das, Author

Consequently, farmers in developing countries are now not permitted to store seeds without paying corporations for the privilege. Who gave corporations this privilege? This issue is known as ‘bio-piracy’. In India, millions of farmers borrowed money to purchase corporate-produced GM seeds that were around 1,000 times more expensive than traditional seeds, but when the crops failed these farmers were left with huge debts. The situation was compounded by the fact that the GM seeds contain terminator technology, so that famers had to buy new seeds each year. This crisis is said to have resulted in over 250,000 farmers committing suicide in India between 1995 and 2009, see Endnote .

Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages

3.7 By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services, including for family planning, information and education, and the integration of reproductive health into national strategies and programmes.

3.8 By 2030, universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all.

3.b Support the research and development of vaccines and medicines for the communicable and non-communicable diseases that primarily affect development countries.

Translation:

Mass vaccination, mass abortion and population control. For evidence of the devasting effects and deaths due to the Covid-19 vaccinations see the book No Worries No Virus

Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all

4.7 By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity…

Translation:

UN propaganda and brainwashing through compulsory education from “cradle to grave”. All learners must be indoctrinated into sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles. What is a sustainable lifestyle? In part it is one that complies with the bogus UN doctrine that CO2 emissions or methane from cows causes climate change. The word ‘ensure’ is also a blatant admission of forced indoctrination. How do they intend to enforce this?

Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls

5.5. Ensure women’s full and effective participation and equal opportunities for leadership at all levels of decision-making in political, economic and public life.

5. C Adopt and strengthen sound policies and enforceable legislation for the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls at all levels.”

Translation:

I, and surely everyone, fully agrees, of course, that women, and all people, should be paid equal pay for equal work. However, there is a deeper story here that should be noted and that story involves the tax system. When you understand the tax system you may begin to realise that the UN goal of ‘gender equality’ is not the noble endeavour it may appear to be.

It is actually about imposing tax trickery upon both genders, ‘equally’, and adding another 2 billion odd people to the tax base. The “powers that be”, not only want billions of men working as tax slaves, they also want billions of women working as tax slaves. These are emotionally sensitive issues, and, for many people, it is not easy to accept that we have been misled about the true motivations of the UN and what lies behind government policy in relation to gender equality.

Note here the video testimony of Aaron Russo who was, at one time, a family friend to the Rockefeller banking family.

He stated that the Rockefeller banking dynasty planned and funded the modern feminist movement and the political roots of gender equality specifically for reasons including: Social engineering to destroy the traditional family unit in which the parents were the main influence on the child, i.e., so that all control of society and children would be under the auspices of the state, and so that children could be indoctrinated with state values from a young age; population control to be achieved through forced ‘Family Planning’; to turn women into tax payers; and to stop women producing children.

If I said to you:

“Men and women will only be allowed to work in this world, to generate money for themselves and their families, if they pay around 80% of their earnings to wealthy international privately-owned mega-banks, and to national government bureaucracies that are fully aligned with, and subservient to, the dictates and policies of those mega-banks.”

Would you think that is fair? Would you think that is something to campaign in favour of? Yet, that is a close approximation of what is actually occurring in the current world-wide government and tax system via direct and hidden taxes.

Tragically, the entire process, which was funded by mega-banks, has also resulted in a sort of political schism, or mental tension, between some men and women. It appears to me that, all men and all women, would be better served by working with each other to eliminate the fraudulent systems of taxations and banking usury. Then, both women and men, and all working families, would have much more money in their pockets, because the trillions of dollars that are being paid to international mega-banks each year, as interest on the national debts, would no longer need to be collected from the people in the form of taxes.

Note here that over the past centuries men have been conditioned to accept the fraud and trickery of increasingly higher levels of tax upon earnings. Few people realise that the government typically takes around 80% of your entire income. This 80% is taken via various tax mechanisms that act upon your personal income, and upon the money you spend on products. All consumer products have a large amount of hidden tax embedded in their retail price. This hidden embedded tax has accumulated at each of the multiple stages of the product supply chain.

Furthermore, for decades, around one quarter, and up to one half, of the 80% tax take goes directly from the government to international privately-owned mega-banks and financial institutions, to pay the interest on national debt-money loans. This debt-money is created from nothing by these banks, and, the national debt, is therefore a hoax and a scam.

The essential point here that governments, or the UN, do not tell you, is that this means that, for around nine and a half months of every year, you are working for nothing as a slave for the government, i.e., you only get to keep around two and a half-months of your annual income for yourself.

When you realise the truth about the tax system, you may begin to realise that the UN gender equality goal is not primarily about ensuring women have equal pay rights, it is primarily about conditioning women to be a willing and enthusiastic part of the current deceptive worldwide tax system, so that around 80% of women’s earnings will go directly to government. Surely, neither men nor women would consent to this. Both men and women that are aware of this would surely not consent to have around 80% of their earnings taken from them via direct and hidden taxes.

UN gender equality is not so much about gender equality, it is primarily about promoting and ensuring tax slavery for all, equally. For thousands of years, women and men have always worked, albeit, often in differing ways and roles. The government taxation system has been stealthily inflicted upon the populace, in particular, in recent centuries. The UN do not want women (or men) working for themselves outside the punitive tax system. Of course, women and men should work if they so wish, and for equal pay for equal work, but why pay 80% tax? Do you see the trickery? Do you see why the UN want to control the entire narrative? A narrative that is promoted and implemented by governments who will take around 80% of your earnings one way or another.

Recall that around half of the monies the government takes in taxes goes directly from the government to international privately-owned mega-banks and financial institutions, to pay the interest on national debt-money loans. This debt-money is created from nothing by these banks. Recall that the international private-banking cartel of banking families is pre-dominantly Jewish. Is it just a co-incidence that all the major promoters of the banker-funded feminist movement, and the most prominent feminists ever, were dozens of Jewish women? These women include Gloria Steinem, Andrea Dworkin, Betty Friedan, Eve Ensler, Rosa Luxemburg, Blu Greenberg, Judy Cohen, Gertrude Stein, Helen Cohen, Jean Rothernberg, Lisa Goldberg, Madelaine Stern, Ruth Ginsburg, Ruth Morgenthau, etc. For example, if you look at the Jewish Womens Archive website it will show you a list of key Jewish feminists, containing 1,193 profiles.

Goal 6: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all

Translation:

Privatize all water sources, don’t forget to add fluoride (hydro fluorosilicate, which is an industrial by-product and toxin) and aluminum (which is extremely toxic to humans).

Goal 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all

Translation:

Smart grid control of your access to energy. Smart meters that emit electro-magnetic field radiation compulsorily inserted into your home to access your data, and introduce peak pricing, etc. They never tell you about the vast energy and environmental expenditure to build a smart grid, hundreds of millions of ‘smart meters’, billions of smart devices, such as TVs, fridges, smartphones, smart cars, etc.

Goal 8: Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all

8.1. Sustain per capita economic growth in accordance with national circumstances and, in particular, at least 7 per cent gross domestic product per annum in the least developed countries.

8.3. Promote development oriented policies… including through access to financial services

8.4. … Endeavour to de-couple economic growth from environmental degradation

Translation:

A continuation of the usury economy in which wealth always flows upwards to the private banking system. “At least 7% GDP growth in least developed countries” means the globalists want these economies growing under the whip of globalisation, so these countries can pay vast sums of interest to international mega-banks on fraudulent debt-money loans created from nothing. GDP growth is always needed so that vast sums of interest collected via taxes will continue to flow from governments to the private international banking cartel. Free trade zones, as espoused by the UN, would favour mega-corporate interests, globalisation, and endless polluting forms of GDP growth.

Is ‘free trade’ really free or is it just a deceptive buzzword for corporate globalisation? The UK government sustainable development strategy states “internationally, we need to promote the mutual supportiveness of trade liberalisation…”, see Endnote , yet traditionally, environmentalists have taken a strong line against free trade, see Endnote . The concept of trade liberalisation has always been a contentious issue environmentally due to needless shipping of goods worldwide that could be produced locally. It also involves the exportation of manufacturing jobs to sweat shops across the so-called developing world, resulting in the suppression of opportunity and income in the importing country to achieve so-called economic equality, which is actually illusory.

“Endeavour to de-couple economic growth from environmental degradation” means even though it has already been comprehensively demonstrated that 30 years of attempting to de-couple economic growth from environmental impacts has completely failed and is a policy that will never work, we are going to keep repeating this de-coupling nonsense to pretend that we are trying to stop ‘real’ pollution.

Goal 10: Reduce inequality within and among countries

10.b. Encourage official development assistance and financial flows, including foreign direct investment, to… in particular developing countries

10.c. By 2030, reduce to less than 3 per cent the transaction costs of migrant remittances and eliminate remittance corridors with costs higher than 5 per cent

Translation:

“Development assistance” means get developing countries hooked on debt-money loans (created from nothing) and have them put up national assets as collateral. Then later, pull the plug, with a boom-bust-bailout scenario, just as has been done in many other countries, and leave the country in perpetual debt slavery. Virtually every government worldwide is in vast debt to the privately-owned debt-money banking system, see the book Demonic Economics.

We the globalists want the whole world under our thumb of globalisation. We do not want people to develop ‘real local sustainability’ in their own country or have any knowledge of how to do that. Rather, we want large amounts of people to be displaced, subject to migration from orchestrated wars, and living in our ‘smart’ cities as slaves to the globalised economy, which is owned by our mega-banks and mega-corporations.

Goal 11: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable

Translation:

Have a ‘Big Brother’ big data surveillance state and a behaviour-based digital social credit system to keep you under our control. This is already in operation in China, where over 200 million surveillance cameras had been installed by 2018, with plans for over 600 million.

UN Agenda 2030 and WEF-promoted smart cities are smart for the so-called powers that be, but not smart for you. Furthermore, sustainable development, as defined in Agenda 2030 involves the mass rollout and utilisation of so-called smart technology. This includes wireless technology, such as WIFI, smartphones, 5G, smart meters, and the so called ‘Internet of Things’, etc. However, it has clearly been demonstrated by thousands of studies, see Endnote , that the above microwave-based wireless technologies utilise electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs) that can harm human health, and in particular, the brain development of children. In these studies, EMFs are linked with chronic fatigue, headaches, tinnitus, depression, cancer and chronic degenerative disorders.

Smart cities will utilise social credit-scoring, which is already in use in China, and requires large data collection on every citizen. In China, for example, financial transactions, organisation affiliations, social interactions, friendships, and data-mining of a citizen’s history on social media are collected.

The surveillance network is an integral part of the data collection process. A person’s social credit score depends on, for example, whether they criticise the government or comply with the government – therefore, each person is compelled to comply with government to maintain their social credit scoring and receive benefits. It is a sort of digital dictatorship. It has been reported that the Chinese authorities even run ‘pre-crime’ algorithms against the data collected.

In these UN-planned smart cities, the right to privacy is entirely subverted, as people are expected to consent to their data being collected, and their activities being monitored constantly, under the pretext of preventing crime. The smart city requires wireless connectivity to function, and this is the real reason that 5G is being rolled out worldwide at rapid pace. Even whilst the so-called pandemic was in full swing, and everyone else was locked down, communications companies’ employees installing 5G infrastructure were working full-time. So, 5G enables ‘smart-city’ super-computers to analyse the activities of a whole city of people in real-time, and to utilise Geospatial Intelligence to monitor and manage large crowds of people, supposedly for reasons, such as improving the flow of shoppers. The expenditure of trillions of dollars on technology and surveillance infrastructure to improve the flow of shoppers – am I the only one that doesn’t buy that?

Goal 12: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns’

*Acknowledging that the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is the primary international, intergovernmental forum for negotiating the global response to climate change.

Translation:

Forced austerity, reduced access to resources, and more taxation for the people under the pretext of combatting manmade climate change and other SCP policies – meanwhile our mega-corporations continue to plunder and pollute the natural world, for example to produce many millions of batteries for electric cars. Oh, and by the way don’t forget, the UN framework is the only place where you are allowed to discuss the climate change issue – we do not want scientists to convene outside of our bogus UN climate change framework. Books such as Transcending the Climate Change Deception Toward Real Sustainability and Climate CO2 Hoax describe that thousands of scientists dispute the unproven UN-promoted man-made climate-change theory, but we the UN don’t tell the public about that. The above books also describe additional deceptive aspects of our UN policies that are not open for discussion, such as:

the failure of resource-efficiency, resource substitution or eco-efficiency strategies;
the UN trick of blaming population growth rather than addressing the root causes of environmental destruction and human poverty worldwide, i.e., the privately owned worldwide debt-money banking system that was instrumental in creating the unelected UN and the system of environmentally destructive corporate globalisation in the first place’
the UN Brundtland definition of sustainable development actually enabled ‘polluting’ forms of globalisation/GDP growth to rampantly continue.

Goal 13: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts

13.2. Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies and planning

13.3. Improve education, awareness-raising and human and institutional capacity on climate change mitigation, adaptation, impact reduction and early warning.

Translation:

This is simply promotion of globalist policies e.g., Cap and Trade, carbon taxes/credits, and footprint taxes. We the globalists are trying to change your society to suit our own agenda and you will have no say in how your society will function. We are trying to indoctrinate your children and all of society to believe our man-made climate-change lie, so that we can achieve complete control of society, as well as manipulate society and population behaviour the way we want to without any resistance.

Goal 16: Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels

16.1 Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related deaths rates everywhere

16.3 Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all

16.4 By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows… and combat all forms of organised crime

16.8 Broaden and strengthen the participation of developing countries in the institutions of global governance

16.9 By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration.

Translation:

16.1. “Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related deaths rates everywhere” means except when we the globalists do it – i.e. implement violence and population reduction via intentionally orchestrated wars, the mass sale of toxic vaccines, the proliferation of drug culture, human trafficking networks, and the promotion of mass abortion. In these horrific punch-and-judy show wars (the economics of destruction) both sides are assured funding, our military-industrial corporations make countless billions from sales of weapons, military technology and equipment; and our mega-corporations secure huge post-war contracts for rebuilding infrastructure.

16.3 means we want you to obey our laws, even though you did not write them.

16.4 “significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows” means except for our corporate ‘legitimate’ military industrial complex that supplies arms to our member governments, especially the US, Israel, Russia, China, U.K., France, Germany, and the G20, which we own and control.

16.8 means we the globalists want all developing countries (that is poorer countries whose people are particularly burdened by debt and whose resources are exploited by corporate globalisation) to be subject to and ruled by our institutions of global governance i.e., the unelected UN, the WHO, the World Bank, the IMF, the WTO, etc.

16.9 means we the globalists want everyone registered so we know where you are and can tax you. This is all a rationale for digital IDs. Note that in a UN Conference in 2016, Bill Gates was able to introduce into the 16th SDG sub-targets his rationale to introduce digital IDs, according to some sources, most likely injected via vaccines, with trials conducted in the third world, see Endnote . Remember that we “the globalists” think we own you, and that you “the common people” are no more than government collateral on loans your government received from our international private banking cartel – money that we never had in the first place – that we created out of thin air via our debt-money system.

Goal 17: Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development

17.1 Strengthen domestic resource mobilization, including through international support to developing countries, to improve domestic capacity for tax and other revenue collection.

17.4 Assist developing countries in attaining long-term debt sustainability through coordinated policies aimed at fostering debt financing, debt relief and debt restructuring, as appropriate, and address the external debt of highly indebted poor countries to reduce debt distress.

17.7 Promote the development, transfer, dissemination and diffusion of environmentally sound technologies to developing countries on favourable terms, including on concessional and preferential terms, as mutually agreed.

17.9 Enhance international support for implementing effective and targeted capacity-building in developing countries to support national plans to implement all the Sustainable Development Goals…

17.10 Promote a universal, rules-based, open, non-discriminatory and equitable multilateral trading systems under the World Trade Organisation…

17.17 Encourage and promote effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships, building on the experience and resourcing strategies of partnerships.

17.18 By 2020, enhance capacity-building support to developing countries… to increase significantly the availability of high-quality, timely and reliable data disaggregated by income, gender, age, race, ethnicity, migratory status, disability, geographic location…

Translation:

Remove the ability of people worldwide to decide how to live their own lives, and promote global authority, mega-corporate influence, and bloated unelected bureaucracy of international institutions, including the UN, the World Economic Forum, and public-private (corporate) partnerships.

17.1. means we the globalists want to collect more tax from everyone.

17.4 means as long as the world is in vast debt we don’t really care – even if the debt is restructured it doesn’t matter. We don’t care just as long as developing countries remain in debt to the mega-banks and financial institutions of our private banking cartel and continue to flail on our hook. The one thing we will never do is cancel debt – if we ever do so it will be to introduce conditionalities of control. If we introduce a one world digital currency and cancel your national debt you will have to give up ownership of assets, just as is stated in our marketing document on our World Economic Forum website…

“Welcome to 2030: I Own Nothing, Have No Privacy And Life Has Never Been Better”.

17.7 means we the globalists want developing countries hooked on contracts and debts to pay for our corporate technologies that will leave them dependent on the globalised corporate system that we control. Never let countries, regions or communities develop real local self-sufficiency, locally suitable technologies, or mid-level intermediate technologies that are suited to their local needs and can be sustained long term from their local resources, local manpower, local skills and local knowledge.

17.9 means let us put international pressure on these poorer countries so that they will accept and implement our deceptive plans.

17.10 means the WTO rules world trade. We the globalists run the WTO and we make up the trading rules. We say its equitable, but you have to obey our trading rules, which are economic tricks based on the monetary system that we own and control.

17.17 means we the globalists must ensure corporate (private) influence in politics is effective so that we can control the levers of the political system. Civil society has little money in comparison to the mega-corporations of the world, thus the corporate and financial institutions will have the most influence.

17.18 means in our system of globalisation we want to know everything about everyone so that we can utilise or manipulate the masses, as we see fit – just as a farmer keeps registration charts for each cow on his farm, we have a chart on you too.