‘Stunning moral cowardice’: UK inquiry into COVID jabs postponed ‘indefinitely’

The fourth module of the UK government’s official inquiry into the development of Covid vaccines and drugs has been postponed indefinitely.

The hearings, originally set for this summer, have been rescheduled ‘to ensure effectiveness in 2024’. Baroness Heather Hallett, the chair of the investigation, expressed disappointment but said there was a ‘need for thorough preparation.’

The delay was explained in part because of lawsuits against AstraZeneca over vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia.

The inquiry, which has so far cost around £145 million, is divided into six modules, each focusing on different aspects of the pandemic response.

The first two looked at pandemic preparedness, UK decision-making, and political governance. Future modules will address healthcare equipment procurement, distribution, and the impact on adult social care.

Notable figures such as Boris Johnson, Rishi Sunak, Matt Hancock, Chris Whitty, Jonathan Van-Tam, and Patrick Vallance have provided insights into the government’s handling of the crisis. Vallance’s diary excerpts, revealing Sunak’s focus on managing scientists rather than the virus, were part of the second module. The hearings are now set for a later date to allow organisations to focus on the third module, which examines the ‘pandemic’s’ impact on healthcare.

‘Stunning moral cowardice’

The decision to delay the inquiry gave rise to sharp criticism from experts and the general public, with some believing it a stall tactic to ensure investigation of the mRNA gene therapy would not happen before the UK 2024 general election, which is expected to be held sometime in the second half of this year.

Lawyer and founder of children’s advocacy group UsForThem Molly Kingsley lambasted the delay, describing it as an example of ‘stunning moral cowardice’.

‘In the midst of an unprecedented cardiac-event fuelled excess death crisis, the UK’s @covidinquiryuk has just announced it is to postpone the key vaccine and vaccine harm module until AFTER the general election,’ she tweeted.

Former heart surgeon Dr. Ahmad Malik asked if there was any good reason ‘why the UK Covid inquiry would delay the investigation of the “vaccines” until after the General Election? Happy to rush through the development of a dangerous experimental relatively untested new platform but not investigate it.’

Former political candidate and businessman Jim Ferguson said the delay raised, ‘serious concerns about the transparency and accountability of the government’, believing it was a ploy to shield politicians from electoral backlash.

‘This delay is particularly alarming given the rapid pace at which COVID-19 vaccines were developed, tested, and approved. It took approximately 11 months for vaccines like the U.K.’s own AstraZeneca to go from development to approval.

‘In stark contrast, the government is taking longer than this entire process to even start the Covid vaccine investigation. Such procrastination is indicative of a possible attempt by the government and globalist politicians to avoid public scrutiny and accountability before the election.

‘The public deserves answers about the vaccine development process, and this delay could be seen as a tactic to keep them in the dark, potentially shielding politicians from electoral backlash.’

Of course, it is delayed.
The outcome will be pretty predictable even if it goes ahead.
I should be appointed chair of the inquiry.
I’ll have the whole thing wrapped up in a day.
Save us all a lot of time and money! pic.twitter.com/Vdr4SsNVRH

— Dr Ahmad Malik (@DocAhmadMalik) January 13, 2024