Some of the biggest names in artificial intelligence are backing calls to curb the rapid development of increasingly capable AI systems amid warnings that the technology could become dangerously difficult to control.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has urged developers to deliberately slow advances at the AI frontier, citing risks ranging from cyberattacks and biological threats to economic upheaval and systems potentially operating beyond human oversight.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman supported stronger independent scrutiny and the need to better manage the pace of frontier development, while xAI founder Elon Musk endorsed Amodei’s concerns, saying he has long warned about AI dangers. The debate intensified after researcher Jacob Coxon resigned from Anthropic, alleging that leading laboratories were pursuing self-improving superintelligence without adequate safeguards. Amodei has proposed independent access for safety evaluators, shared industry standards and international coordination, arguing these measures could reduce risks without surrendering US technological leadership.
However, Palantir CEO Alex Karp has opposed slowing development, warning that doing so could hand an advantage to American rivals.
I doubt that is the real reason
Anthropic and Open AI models have been eclipsed by China who have developed better more simplistic evolving models with their own chips at a fraction of the price
AI in the US and elsewhere has been massively over invested and is a bubble about to burst while requiring huge more amounts of capital while at the same time delivering no returns nor any prospect in the interim of achieving such
These people are clearly looking for an off ramp while at the same time saving face after blindly walking into a pit
China has headed them off at the pass
And now they are going to have to run the gauntlet
And hopefully face the music
This baby has run out of gas and momentum
For discussion
Growing pains not birth pains
These “leaders” want regulation that enables them to keep control and profit from developing A.I… in the name safety and security! It is the average consumer of this technology that will suffer; with no appreciable improvement of safety nor security.
China “won’t stop can’t stop”.
The Plot to Criminalize Open Source AI and Grant Tech Giants a Protected AI Cartel
https://old.bitchute.com/video/K0YJkH0sq49A/
The real problem with AI, as far as I can see, is it could do things its creators may not have foreseen, potentially placing them and their companies in legal jeopardy.This, I suspect is why we are seeing such a push for de-regulation and not just for AI. You can’t be held accountable to legal standards, that don’t exist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F33Ohjufi9k
Just another j3wcon about to be harvested.
That’s what the AI fear porn is about.
Anyone invesring in AI is about to go down.
Thats why Labour wants to inest on it, to drain more money out of NZ for the . Just like the covid scam.
Deregulation can create a dynamic environment for AI innovation, but it also raises significant concerns regarding ethical practices and user safety. Balancing these factors is crucial for the responsible development of AI technologies
Risks
Potential for harmful biases in AI systems due to lack of oversight
Increased likelihood of privacy violations as companies may not adhere to strict data protection standards
Challenges in ensuring user safety and ethical use of AI technologies
Benefits
Accelerated development of AI tools and applications
Greater flexibility for companies to experiment with new technologies
So would the benefits outweigh the risks?
Its all uncharted territory
Might be a bit late for that anyway
Here we go…from 60 ears ago…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIpsvF50yps
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHUZCVl28lg
Brilliant comment
Links so relevant
Thank you