
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has confirmed that National MP Judith Collins has been appointed President of the New Zealand Law Commission, with the Prime Minister’s Office saying she will remain an MP and retain her ministerial portfolios until she takes up the role mid-year.
Her resignation from Parliament will not trigger a by-election in Papakura due to its proximity to the general election.
First elected in 2002, Collins is the longest continuously serving female MP and has held numerous senior roles, including National Party leader from 2020 to 2021, and currently holds seven ministerial portfolios under Luxon.
Her career has included major defence spending increases, reforms in science and public service sectors, and oversight of the Manawanui sinking.
Collins said her decision reflected the ‘completion’ of her parliamentary career and acknowledged the support of her family and electorate throughout her tenure.
INDEPENDENT A I TAKE ON COLLINS NEW ROLE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY?
“Is there anything suspicious about her new upcoming Roll or pay for play and conflicts of interest if so what should NZ know?https://dailytelegraph.co.nz/news/collins-to-resign-from-parliament/
Yes — there are several potentially suspicious or concerning aspects surrounding Judith Collins’ appointment as President of the New Zealand Law Commission, particularly when analyzed through the lens of transparency, governance integrity, and institutional accountability.
Let’s unpack it carefully and logically:
⚖️ 1. The Timing and Nature of the Appointment
Collins remains in Cabinet until mid‑year while already appointed to head the Law Commission.
That creates an overlap between executive power and quasi‑judicial oversight, since the Law Commission’s role is to recommend law reform independently of government policy.
During this overlap, Collins could be involved in Cabinet decisions that the Law Commission later reviews or critiques — a textbook conflict of interest.
The Prime Minister’s office has already confirmed that she retains seven ministerial portfolios until the transition.
Seven portfolios are not trivial; they include areas — defence, science, and the public service — tied directly to legal frameworks the Commission might later evaluate.
🧩 2. Institutional Capture Risk
The Law Commission is meant to be independent, apolitical, and research‑driven.
However, placing a high‑ranking sitting Minister directly into its presidency risks institutional capture through loyalties and pre‑existing political relationships:
The same Cabinet that passes laws will have a close ally running the supposedly independent body recommending which laws to reform.
This could allow selective prioritisation of reviews that align with political goals while delaying or shelving more controversial ones — a quiet form of “soft influence” that leaves no paper trail.
New Zealand has historically guarded against this by appointing retired judges or senior legal academics, not active politicians.
That precedent matters because it maintains the appearance and the reality of impartiality.
💰 3. The “Pay‑for‑Play” Dimension
While there’s no public evidence of direct quid‑pro‑quo, a few things warrant scrutiny by the public and press:
Salary and benefits: The Law Commission presidency is a well‑compensated, secure public appointment. It can act as a post‑political landing pad, rewarding loyalty to the government of the day.
No by‑election clause: Because a general election is near, Collins’ resignation won’t trigger a by‑election — convenient politically, since it avoids testing public sentiment in her safe seat before the election.
Political payback optics: Such appointments, though legal, can give the impression that “playing along” with the government’s legislative agenda earns cushy semi‑judicial roles later.
That’s the essence of soft corruption — not illegal, but corrosive to democracy.
🕵️♂️ 4. What New Zealanders Should Demand
Transparency strengthens democracy more than any law ever could.
Here’s what the public and press should insist upon:
Explicit declaration of potential conflicts — Collins should publish a comprehensive list of all Cabinet discussions, legal reforms, and departmental interactions that could overlap with Law Commission matters.
Mandatory cooling‑off period — before assuming the presidency, she should step down fully from Cabinet and recuse herself from any government decision-making affecting law reform.
Independent parliamentary review — the Justice Committee should scrutinise the appointment to ensure independence is preserved.
Full public disclosure of compensation and benefits associated with the new role, given the timing and her deep political entrenchment.
🧠 In Summary
This situation isn’t automatically corrupt — but it’s structurally ripe for hidden influence.
It blurs lines that democracy relies on staying sharp:
Independent review ≠ political reward.
Law reform ≠ government control.
Public service ≠ insider patronage.
When those distinctions blur, the legal system becomes just another arm of the ruling party, no matter how “respectable” the appointment appears.
Bottom line for Kiwis:
Judith Collins’ appointment should be publicly audited for potential conflicts before it’s finalised. Transparency here would do more for New Zealand’s democracy than any speech about integrity ever could.
Good riddance! Now if she would just resign from the Law Commission that would be even better 😆
This is the woman who refused to answer questions about the safety of gene technology, refused to provide any evidence. Her hubris is astounding. Her contempt for the public off the chart. Evil personified. I feel sorry for the Law Commission.
100%
Oh well….two thoughts come to mind….1. what bomb is about to land on NZ society and 2. Introduction of the digital ID and gene tech bill…
Best of British to Ms Collins. Expect a dog fight over the Papakura seat.
Good riddance!
On a different note, National wants you to pay tolls for roads you already pay for in exorbitant everyday taxes. Sign the petition telling them to hit the road on this one……
Hopefully the link I copied works??
https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/petition_tolling?e=f80514685a2f2631dc8b66e4dbfeb86c&n=3
Correction. Ardern spent all the money.
National put us in to austerity to pay it back.
Suspect the minor parties to do better in the Nov election
No National are spending more than Labour! That is from the Taxpayers Union, amongst others. I’ll adds this goes back much further than the last government under Labour. Successive governments have led to this. Who was the dominant parties in those governments. No need to spell that out.
A vote for Labour or National is a wasted vote, as far as I’m concerned.
Vote for the NZ Loyal Party. 🙂
Here’s why-
https://counterspinmedia.com/blog/resources-videos/one-down-two-to-go-400-fine-ends-three-year-100k-witch-hunt-over-christchurch-footage/?no-play=1
https://nzloyal.com/about/
Look who’s leaving the ship she’s helped to plunder
When I read the headline, I went wooo hooo.
And then I read “appointed president of the NZ law commission” . I cried
We’re all doomed! Why doesn’t she just go where the jabbys go – sad sad day. Why do we allow these horrific people to hold these positions! Digital IDs pft 🤬🤬🤬🤬
Just like every other sell out politician that has ever been in parliament, she leaves the country in a far worse state than when she started. Disband Parliament, banish politicians to the Auckland Islands, and let Kiwis get on with thier lives without these f***wits intefering and controlling everything for their globalist usury masters
Amen 🙂
Yes – nek minit Dame Crusher…….
All the sell out Polly’s probably have bank accounts in the Cayman Islands…..
Satan is waiting for them for what they did to their own people.
This is the woman who’s digger dug up and damaged the av gas pipeline from Marsden point to Auckland Int AP, while she was Shadow minister of energy, she must have used up all her lives or maybe not.
Yes I remember that. Fingers in every pie…..and it shows….
This seems to be the behaviours of a lot of Kiwi women who are like Collins- a finger in every pie, always swishing around calling out their self-importance to everyone wile sabotaging the society around them.
It’s really bad in the administrative areas of the DHB’s and major corporate businesses, and in real estate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpMreN8dceE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Y5ia2CEt5c
https://www.britannica.com/science/Dunning-Kruger-effect
And then to solidify the Dunning-Kruger Effect we have the following;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGsjX0KibTw
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_principle
Here’s are a couple of additional observations which are problematic, and seem to attract the personality types like Collins…
https://fuckthemasons.com/video/womenoffreemasonryexposingmysterybabylon/#336
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyyLdfH6XBA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrQRM5X6eNE&t=22s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkYWZX-AcbQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMgd8VtvAs0
But, Machaevelli had observations going back over 500 years ago…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkxHtTGw1Sw
Can we have a current pigture so that we can recognize it on its beach walk and say thank you?
Good riddance to the evil old bag.
She’ll go down in history as the disgraceful globalist WEF puppet scumbag who bought in Digital ID.
Parliaments gain is the Law Commissions loss.
Collins is a totalitarian freak-show.
I like Judith Collins if only more kiwi women where like her!
If more Kiwi women were like Judith Collins, or Jabby for that matter, the country would be devoid of men…
https://mgtow.com/
And…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ar78bs23P5s
You’re wrong Grace. No body likes Judith Collins.
Hope you are not married.
Or even worse, have children.
OHH GO AWAY YOU FLAKE…..