Campaigner Liz Gunn was convicted of assaulting an Auckland Airport security worker in February 2023.
Gunn’s application for a discharge without conviction was heard today in the Manukau District Court.
Judge Janey Forrest ruled the conviction was proportionate to the offending.
While the judge acknowledged the assault was minor, she ruled the circumstances warranted the entering of a conviction. An application for costs by the prosecution was declined.
This is just an attempt to convince others that if you go against the govt narrative they will cut you down anyway they can for their globalist bosses.
Backed up by de banking
What utter offensive arrogance by her gawd-graciousness, the totally-removed-from-the-people Justitia jjudge Janey Forrest to rule such blatant nonsense. What a pawn in the system her hiness she is.
Remember judge, you work for the common law too. We the people will never forget.
“Judge Janey Forrest ruled the conviction was proportionate to the offending”.
You mean this judge;
The courtroom was charged with tension as Judge Janey Forrest announced Gunn’s conviction, according to state media. Emotions ran high throughout the trial, particularly when Judge Forrest exited the courtroom, prompting shouts of “There goes the corrupt judge, shame on you” and “what a joke” from some supporters.
What a disgrace.
What is a disgrace is giving someone a criminal charge for touching someone on their shoulder.
So much for a justice system. Shame on the police and the judiciary for allowing this ridiculous case to progress this far and for not demanding ALL the video footage be retained and provided to all parties.
Shame on all involved. No conscience, no morals. This country has departed from all common sense and fairness. 😡
Anyone thinking there is anything that looks like true justice in New Zealand, can think again. Just another US colony……
What a rort. If that was assault, what was the police action?
Self defence?
Justifiable force?
“Assault” 😒
Liz Gunn continues to suffer pain from injuries sustained by an overly-aggressive cop / security guard.
But, the outcome is nothing less than what we anticipated and expected.
I wonder if the female Judge is a Freemason???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyyLdfH6XBA
You make yourself sound like aright idiot with that statement about freemasonry.
Why? Freemasonry is just a bunch of friendless old men enabling higher ups and pedophiles to control the world and worship the devil. If you are awake you know, and if not then do some research…out very own communist Marxist Jabcinda received a Freemasons scholarship- look it up if you dint believe me.
The Order of Women in Freemasonry was founded in London in 1908. There is also another female chapter with less ritual. The Order has female lodges around the world…
Ditto to all the above (or below) replies.
“Judge” Janey Forrest should rightly be stripped of her license and never be allow to judge again.
She was 100% bias.
Worse, LOOK AT THE ACTUAL ASSAULT FOOTAGE THE NZ POLICE DID! And got away with it.
Sadly, NZ has gone completely fine the toilet now.
Exactly, the only assault here was the way the police handled Liz and her Camera man. Shame on them and that lame arse biarch at the airport who called the police. All of them are morally corrupt.
The nation has ruled Judge Janey Forrest is a deep state appeaser and her ruling in this matter will be considered unjust by the people. It will be the shame she will have to live with for the rest of her career. Sneered at by people in public until she can’t go out.
One day, when the just people rule, Liz Gunn will receive her pardon and honers. In the meantime, she will remain our beloved lady of New Zealand and a guardian of truth.
If Janey Forrest wanders into your place of business, you have the right to tell her that you will not trade with her and to get out. Fill in a trespass notice and file it with the police. Deep state appeasers will not be tolerated.
Of course the woke ****hole janey declined is she a transvestite? Probably you are a sick mother fr that wasn’t even jabbed just like the beautifully unabbed that were persecuted by Jabbycinda’s evil father! Did you know that janey? Liz exposed the treatment of the 15yo also abused by ministry of education who removed the child’s ability to study WTF!!!! People like you janey and jabbycinda are sick and should just f off and f again PLEASE disgusting pieces of human trash which includes sooooo many – karma is a b**** narcism does not win, look at america
https://www.thelawyermag.com/nz/news/general/district-court-welcomes-three-new-judges/403730
Well, well, previously specialized in ” insurance litigation” . So she has previous links with insurance cie. Am i thinking in the right direction ?
Judges are Nasi’s of the Court
Who control both sides
Thereby determining the outcome
It’s genuinely frightening that our ‘judges’ are so blatantly bent, immoral, inept and corrupt.
The bent ‘ judge’ should be fired immediately.
He/she/it is clearly a crooked individual, and entirely unfit for government (or any other) employment.
Ah yep.
A typical compromised communist judge.
Skeletons jangling in the closet no doubt.
One wonders how the thugs masquerading as Lice treat their wives, mothers and daughters, and how they triangulate their moral compass as bullies, complicit camp guards and quintessential mindless goons? /sarc
A time will surely arise when the globalist complicit NZ judiciary find themselves bereft of standing and quite naked in the light of justice.
Political prosecution.
Touching of the arm is full cause to grant a discharge without conviction.
Sentencing Act 2002
106 Discharge without conviction
(1) If a person who is charged with an offence is found guilty or pleads guilty, the court may discharge the offender without conviction, unless by any enactment applicable to the offence the court is required to impose a minimum sentence.
(2) A discharge under this section is deemed to be an acquittal.
(3) A court discharging an offender under this section may—
(a) make an order for payment of costs or the restitution of any property; or
(b) make any order for the payment of any sum that the court thinks fair and reasonable to compensate any person who, through, or by means of, the offence, has suffered—
(i) loss of, or damage to, property; or
(ii) emotional harm; or
(iii) loss or damage consequential on any emotional or physical harm or loss of, or damage to, property:
(c) make any order that the court is required to make on conviction.
(3A) Sections 32 to 38A apply, with any necessary modifications, to an order under subsection (3)(b) as they apply to a sentence of reparation.
(4) [Repealed]
(5) Despite subsection (3)(b), the court must not order the payment of compensation in respect of any consequential loss or damage described in subsection (3)(b)(iii) for which compensation has been, or is to be, paid under the Accident Compensation Act 2001.
https://www.crimelawyer.co.nz/discharge-without-conviction.html
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2002/0009/latest/DLM136807.html