17.3 C
Auckland
Monday, December 23, 2024

Popular Now

New case report calls for ‘careful’ research into mRNA COVID jab and ‘turbo cancer’ link

The report examined the case of a man who developed an ‘aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19.’

In this case the man’s malignancy showed symptoms consistent with Bell’s palsy and trigeminal neuralgia beginning four days post-vaccination.

‘The type of malignancy we describe suggests a population risk for occurrence of a large variety of relatively common basaloid phenotype cancer cells, which may have the potential for metastatic disease. This can be avoidable with early diagnosis and adequate treatment.

The authors called for research to examine any link between mRNA gene therapy and the development of turbo cancers.

‘Since facial paralysis/pain is one of the more common adverse neurological events following mRNA injection, careful inspection of cutaneous/soft tissue should be conducted to rule out malignancy.’

News of the report was first tweeted by Dr. Peter McCullough, one of America’s most published medical experts and opponent of mRNA ‘vaccine’ use.

Commenters took the opportunity to express their own ‘turbo cancer’ experiences:

My dad died in June of 2022 from “rare and aggressive” small cell bladder cancer. Yes, he was advised by his physician to accept the covid injections (+ booster).

What was the timeline between vaccination and death? My aunts good friend went from Cancer in remission for 5 years , got the first and second shots within 48 hours he had cancer in his liver, blood , bones and died a week later.

I have a male friend who developed a very aggressive facial cancer following vaccination. It was picked up by his dentist. He has undergone extensive surgery and treatment but is thankfully still alive.

My friends Dad rec’d the Vax- died 2 weeks later of leukemia!!

Excellent article, my son-in-law has VAX induced MS! Hopefully this will not turn into cancer!

My beloved father just died of this exact thing. Thought it was Bell’s palsy. Then the exact same cancer diagnosis. He suffered greatly. He was vaccinated.

I’m mad as hell, have two already in my social circle and my daughter took FIVE!!!

Reading all these reports that are now coming out, I’m thankful I did not get vaccinated

Promoted Content

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please keep comments respectful, civil and constructive. Moderation times can vary from a few minutes to a few hours. Comments may also be scanned periodically by Artificial Intelligence to eliminate trolls and spam.

9 COMMENTS

  1. According to widespread coverage of the literature, facial paralysis or pain has been reported as a rare adverse event following mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations, particularly with the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines.
    The specific condition associated with this, Bell’s palsy, is usually a temporary weakness or paralysis of the muscles on one side of the face.
    While there have been some reported cases, the overall incidence of Bell’s palsy following mRNA vaccination appears to be very low.
    The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination, in terms of preventing severe illness and death from the virus, generally outweigh the risks of potential side effects.
    The authors of the reference paper declare that they have no conflicts of interest which is laughable.
    The are all anti-vaccine notables who have published misinformation as a team in several journals.
    A highly critical paper of an article by Seneff et al. entitled “Innate immunosuppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs” was published in Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT).
    The authors of the critique describe why the Seneff et al. paper, which contains unsubstantiated claims and misunderstandings such as “billions of lives are potentially at risk” with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, is problematic and should be retracted. They requested the editor of FCT to retract.
    See:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9607843/

    • What is laughable is your failure to understand what a conflict of interest is. The authors have declared none, it matters not what there personal views are as conflict of interest relates to financial interest. No one can take your comments seriously because it appears u lack a basic knowledge of how papers are written. And your use of the ‘According to widespread coverage of the literature’ in your first sentence is another laughable assertion as the ‘literature’ you refer to is by and large written by those who actually have conflicts of interest.

      • The May-June 2023 issue of the Epub journal Therapie titled ‘Vaccines and Bell’s palsy: A narrative review’ by Bertin et al. states in the abstract:
        “The association between vaccines and peripheral facial palsy (PFP), an issue that has been the subject of debate for many years, has been raised again following results of clinical trials assessing mRNA based COVID-19 vaccines.
        To review the available literature on this topic, PubMed was searched from inception until February 25, 2022.
        Inclusion criteria were case reports with documented rechallenge and comparative epidemiological studies.
        Cases of COVID-19 vaccine-induced PFP with available data on vaccine rechallenge were also identified from Vigibase until December 31, 2021 … Strong evidence was found only for [an] intranasal influenza vaccine while other positive studies detected only a marginal association between PFP and vaccination.”
        An AI search (ChatGPT) also confirms that the overall incidence of Bell’s palsy following mRNA vaccination appears to be very low.
        A January 2022 paper in The Lancet – Infectious Diseases concludes that there is an overall increased risk of Bell’s palsy after CoronaVac vaccination but not after the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccination and that Bell’s palsy is a rare and transient adverse event following immunisation.

        • It’s pretty clear looking at all your comments here and on other articles you are just using ChatGPT to create your comments and copy and paste into the comments section, passing them off as your own. ChatGPTs large language model LLM is severely skewed towards pro-vaccine big pharma and mainstream views. You should be banned from this website for misleading use of AI

  2. Nonsense.
    Neither the Therapie nor Lancet papers come from ChatGPT.
    There has been no attempt to respond to them, especially the Therapie paper which was a wide review of the literature on the issue under discussion.
    Regarding ChatGPT (which I access rarely) I asked “Is ChatGPT’s large language model LLM severely skewed towards pro-vaccine big pharma and mainstream views.” And received the reply:
    “ChatGPT’s responses are generated based on patterns learned from diverse data sources available on the internet up until my last training cut-off in January 2022. While efforts are made to provide balanced and unbiased information, it’s important to note that biases may still be present in the responses. The model doesn’t have opinions or preferences of its own, but it may inadvertently reflect the biases present in the data it was trained on.
    If you have specific concerns about bias in responses related to vaccines, pharmaceuticals, or any other topic, it’s essential to critically evaluate the information and consult multiple sources for a well-rounded perspective. It’s always a good practice to seek information from reputable sources, fact-check when necessary, and consider various viewpoints to form a comprehensive understanding of a topic.”
    The second paragraph of the response should be highly pertinent to many contributors to these columns.

    • You are lying and it is obvious you are using ChatGPT. You should be banned for misleading use of the comments. A number of your comments use language remarkably similar to outputs I have received from that AI, and you are just running the big pharma studies through it or a more general query on big pharma studies and copying and pasting it. The AIs response to severely skewed being a reflection of biases in the data, that’s my whole point! You don’t seem to be aware at all of the current debate over ChatGPT and other AIs built in biases.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest

Trending

Sport

Daily Life

Opinion

Wellington
broken clouds
16.8 ° C
16.8 °
16.8 °
88 %
6.2kmh
75 %
Sun
17 °
Mon
18 °
Tue
19 °
Wed
18 °
Thu
16 °