Watch: Top Canadian Immunologist Byram Bridle: The more vaxed a country is, the more problems it has with COVID

In this must-watch video, Dr. Byram Bridle, Viral Immunologist and Associate Professor at Guelph University in Canada explains why countries with high jab rates are experiencing COVID outbreaks.

Dr. Bridle also discusses the problems with Canada’s adverse reporting systems, and the explosion of aggressive cancers in the vaxed that were once in remission or well-controlled.

Here’s a transcript of part of Dr. Bridle’s interview:

A recent study came out looking at 68 different countries, and they plotted on a graph, the case rate for COVID-19, and the vaccination rate in the country, and the more vaccinated the country is, the more problems they’re having with COVID-19.

So these people who have the vaccine, remember all the anti-body titers they’re showing, that’s in the blood. But these people are, on average, quite poorly protected in their upper airways, and it’s not the virus deep down in the avioli that gets transmitted to other people, because of the dead airspace when we exhale, it’s the viral particles that are in the upper airways. So that’s why the vaccinated can spread this just as easily as someone who’s completely unprotected.

As so these vaccines, on that basis, because they don’t come close to sterlising immunity, they don’t properly protect the upper respitory tract, they only confer four and half months immunity, it’s absolutely 100% impossible to achieve the goal of herd immunity with these vaccines. 100% impossible.

What I’ve seen, way too much of, and it does cause me very serious concern, is we’re seeing people who had cancers that were in remission, or that were being well-controlled, and their cancers have gone completely out of control after getting the vaccine. Now what we do know with the vaccine, is that the vaccine causes at least a temporary drop in T-cell numbers, and those T-cells are part of our immune system, they are the critical weapons our immune system has to fight off cancer cells. So there’s a potential mechanism there, and all I can say is I’ve had many people contact me with way too many of these reports, for me to feel comfortable. That’s probably I would say my newest major safety concern, and it’s also the one that’s going to be by far the most under-reported in any adverse event database because if somebody’s had a cancer before the vaccine, there’s no way public health officials will ever link it to the vaccine.

But what we’re seeing is oncology teams that had pushed the cancers into remission, or to keeping them well controlled, can no longer control them after the vaccine.

So we know that in Canada, it’s very upsetting because in Canada we have a system that will never detect problems with these vaccines, that’s why we’ve always had to rely on other countries, as with the AstraZeneca vaccine. We told Canadians the AstraZeneca vaccine was 100% safe, despite the fact that 12 European countries had paused the programme to look for potential links to the blood clotting, potentially fatal blood clotting. And we were told as Canadians that we didn’t have to worry because they announced the problem was associated with a single batch from a single production facility in Europe and ours was coming from India, and therefore didn’t apply to us. The European Medicines Agency will tell you that was never the case. And then of course after there were Canadians that did die, and many that did had to be treated for the blood clots, then we finally admitted that it was a problem. And that’s how our system is never going to work, because this is the thing. First of all, we’re not informing people when they get that vaccine that they’re to report any unusual medical condition up to 8 weeks after receiving a dose of the vaccine, and the attending physician is required by law to report anything unusual, most physicians are not. Many don’t because they don’t want to contradict the current narrative. And the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario has turned out to be incredibly tyrannical, and are crushing many physicians and threatening many, who don’t go with this narrow public health narrative. Many also can’t get their submissions done because they’re onerous. So for example, British Columbia can take up to 40 minutes to submit one of these reports. And you can imagine an emergency room physician who sees five people in a shift who come in with problems and have been recently vaccinated, they can’t afford to spend hours on that shift reporting it right? So, there’s many reasons why people aren’t reporting to the physicians, and there’s many reasons why the physicians aren’t reporting to the local medical officer of health. And if a physician submits it, it doesn’t go into our database, it goes to the local medical officer of health.

This is the thing: physicians are not supposed to make a determination on whether they think the medical condition that’s occured after the vaccine is, or is not, related to the vaccine. They’re not supposed to make that determination. The local medical officers of health are, and as you can imagine, with the huge bias that exists there, we’re seeing an unusually high percentage of these reports that are submitted there, being rejected at the level of the local medical officer of health. And from there the ones they do approve go to the Public Health Agency of Canada, and then they could be filed into our adverse event database. But because of all the filtering that’s going on, this is the problem, we’re not getting accurate numbers.