Public doubts in U.S. mount over FBI’s Charlie Kirk assassination narrative

The official narrative surrounding the assassination of Charlie Kirk is facing growing skepticism, with many supporters and commentators insisting that key details don’t add up.

At memorial events and in online forums, attendees and observers have voiced doubts that the arrested suspect, Tyler Robinson, acted alone—or even fired the fatal shot.

FBI Director Kash Patel announced this week that the investigation has been formally expanded, citing unanswered questions about ballistics, potential accomplices, communication records, and other evidence. Patel said the bureau is examining “every facet of this assassination” and pledged a thorough review.

Central to public disbelief are conflicting reports about the bullet wound. A Turning Point USA spokesperson described the absence of an exit wound as “a miracle,” suggesting Kirk’s dense bone structure stopped the bullet—a claim critics derided as implausible. Online analysts have since shared audio mapping of gunshots, which they say point to a possible second shooter from a rooftop near the site. Footage of Robinson fleeing also raised questions, as the publicly released video appeared edited and did not show him setting up or firing a weapon.

Theories of multiple shooters gained traction after images surfaced of individuals on rooftops near the scene, sparking debate over whether Robinson was framed or acted as a decoy. Some supporters insist Kirk had privately voiced fears for his life before the attack, adding further weight to demands for a broader inquiry.

With Patel confirming the FBI will continue investigating alternative scenarios, skepticism remains high. For now, critics argue the “official story” is collapsing under the weight of unanswered questions and incomplete evidence.