When will it be called grievous bodily harm – or murder?

No matter how many lies are told, the truth will always surface. — MH

This article is dedicated to New Zealanders who became ill after taking the experimental gene-tech bioweapon on the false assurance it was ‘safe and effective’. It is also for bereaved New Zealanders whose loved ones were killed by the bioweapon. You and your loved ones are not forgotten. You are in our thoughts. We send our love to you and we walk beside you. We will continue to speak up and speak out — for you, your loved ones, and for our country. We will continue to work to create positive change, remove the corruption from our shores, and replace it with truth and love.

Imagine, for a moment, that a multi-billion dollar corporation had a bio-weapon known to potentially cause serious harm and death. They falsely defined this product a ‘vaccine’ and sold it to the government who purchased it as a ‘solution’ to a so-called pandemic that the government was informed was mild and not particularly infectious.

Imagine that this government already knew this patented genetic bio-weapon could cause serious side effects and/or death, yet insisted the people took it, while falsely promising it was ‘safe and effective’. They kept the contents of the product secret so people weren’t able to give informed consent. They tricked or bribed everyone to take it. They pressed harder by mandating it, so people were unable to work unless they took it. Children and teenagers were also coerced, and many had it without parental consent. The media were paid by government to promote the government lies and ostracise and brand heroic objectors as ‘conspiracy theorists’. In doing so, they became accomplices. When New Zealanders peacefully protested those mandates before their parliament, not one MP, government or opposition, came out to talk to them. The political parties were in lockstep. The peaceful protestors were met with brutal force, sonic attacks, bashings and arrests.

Imagine also that the government of that time was already privy to nine pages of adverse events, including myocarditis and death, yet continued to tout it as “safe and effective”. They were also specifically informed of an elevated risk of myocarditis among young people from 12 — 17 and that they should not have a second dose, but this information wasn’t provided to those teenagers or their parents. Instead, Hipkins, who, astonishingly, remains the current leader of the Labour Party, knew this information and yet, in collaboration with Verrall (Minister of Health), Bloomfield (DG of Health) and Ardern (Prime Minister), mandated this age group to take two jabs if they wanted to participate in sport, get a drivers’ licence, or be involved with other activities. Those who didn’t take it were ostracised. Many of those who did take it now have cardiac issues. Some died. Earlier articles cover that here and here. Winston Peters also made this known. The truth was that all who took it were at elevated risk of cardiac issues.  They knew that, too.

Politicians were exempted. No mandates. No enforcement. Able to work.

For several years, it has been known that up to over 11,000 New Zealanders could have been exempted. Many senior health specialists and key personnel refused to have it, so the government gave them exemptions that didn’t extend to other New Zealanders, including those who could not have this gene-based jab due to risk of anaphylactic shock where their reaction is so severe that their heart stops beating, or if they had a serious reaction to their first jab. They were told callously to have the jab at a hospital where they could perhaps be resuscitated.

Pregnant women were strongly encouraged to have this jab in NZ even though it was an experimental gene-based jab, and the contents were unknown. Even Pfizer initially advised against that as – in 2021– a pregnant woman in NZ called Pfizer in the US to enquire if it was safe. She was told they did not advise pregnant women to have it. In NZ it was available to pregnant women. It still is.  In 2021, Medsafe alleged that no safety concerns were identified. Perhaps they weren’t looking. Perhaps they didn’t join the dots. It seems such a strange coincidence doesn’t it that the stats on miscarriages and stillbirths have rapidly escalated? Date coincident with the rollout of the bioweapon. No dot-connectors at Medsafe? It wouldn’t possibly be anything to do with the fact that Medsafe’s funding mainly comes from big-pharma would it? In 2023 it stood at over 84.05%.

What is your view of a government who used your taxes to purchase a bioweapon they forced upon you and your loved ones without divulging the contents, or the dangers, while knowing it could cause injury, harm, and death? And then they mandated it. All for what they knew to be a mostly mild and not particularly transmissible so-called ‘virus’. How would you describe those actions?

What is your view of a government that permitted it to be injected into your body by almost anyone — including teenagers at drive-throughs —  with no required aspiration, which is a standard procedure to ensure the needle hasn’t entered a blood vessel? No fully informed consent, no freedom of choice, no cautions and no care. In violation of the Nuremberg Code, the Hippocratic Oath – First Do No Harm –  the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

What is your view of the fact that after being given clear proof that this product could maim and kill, the government continued to take money from you to pay for and promote more of these injections and made them readily available throughout the country while also generously paying pharmacists and medical staff to deliver them under the bald-faced lie of “safe and effective”? What is your view of a Royal Commission that has this information and then advises more of the same treatment “next time”?

The government did not show any care. Jabs into arms. For everyone. Demonise those speaking out and saying no. No choice if you wanted to keep your job and food on the table or if you wanted to keep your home. No choice if you didn’t want to be isolated from society and treated as ‘unclean’. No choice if you wanted to feed your children. No choice if your teens — and everyone else — wanted to get a driver’s licence for work, or were part of a sports team, the volunteer Fire Brigade, lifesavers and other volunteer organisations. No choice if caring for elderly parents as a care-giver at home or an autistic child. No choice for those allergic to vaccines, based on past experience. No choice if you wanted to see loved ones in rest-homes or hospital. So many New Zealanders died alone. Kept from their loved ones. Isolated.

I know that man who forsakes Truth can forsake his country and his nearest and dearest ones. — Mahatma Gandhi

How would you describe such crimes if done by a private company? Knowing the danger and/or death a product could cause and bribing, and then mandating, New Zealanders to have it — or lose their job, their ability to feed their families, their home, everything?

Would you define it as Serious Harm? Grievous Bodily Harm? Manslaughter? Murder? It is commonly understood that a manslaughter charge is accidental death. If, for example, a hunter accidentally shoots someone while hunting. But if he kept shooting people with intent, then that would be murder wouldn’t it?

This is surely a government crime. It bears repeating: A government responsible for pushing a bioweapon – and mandating it and continuing to make it freely available­ – while knowing it causes severe harm and death. All – to mostly healthy people – for a mild illness they were told was not particularly transmissible. They knew what it could do. They have always known. Yet, as stated, this bio-weapon continues to be readily available throughout the country.

Those who stood firm, despite all, were ostracised, shut out and slandered. Still they stood. They even started up a clinic to help the injured and any New Zealanders who were looking for professionals they could trust. These heroic doctors at NZDSOS  were stalked like prey by the Medical Council of New Zealand MCNZ.  The MCNZ, with a lawyer on the Board who was a key negotiator of the contract between Pfizer and NZ. It states online that he has been a “legal adviser to Pharmac since 1997”. The MCNZ has international connections that also raise concerns, as bravely outlined by Dr Bruce Dooley here.

These brave doctors were brought before appalling MCNZ Inquisitional Hearings, lost their licences and were fined tens of thousands of dollars just for speaking out, or for seeking to help their patients with safer alternatives, such as ivermectin, a  proven safe generic medicine whose inventor won a Nobel Prize, but banned for ‘COVID-19’, despite its effectiveness. Banned because one cannot mandate something new if there is an alternative? Equally courageous nurses, midwives, chiropractors, physios, pharmacists, teachers, and others, suffered similar treatment for speaking out.

More recently, even some mainstream media appear to have slightly surfaced (or are no longer being subsidised to keep to a script) to report that Hipkins, leader of the Labour Party, knew about the dangers of 12 — 17 year old teens having a second jab. So did Bloomfield, Verrall, Ardern, and others.

Why is Hipkins still the Leader of the Labour Party? Why is he – and the others – not answering criminal charges? How is it that Bloomfield, a public servant, can loftily decline to answer questions about the dangers he knew of and yet still pushed? The former PM, Ardern, knew, too.

Why aren’t Verrall, Ardern and Bloomfield also answering criminal charges? Why do Bloomfield and Ardern still have knighthoods? (Not that they mean anything these days. If they did, they would be given to those who had the guts to call this out and continue to do so.)

Why is every MP in every political party in parliament silent on this? Does this not make them, at the least, accomplices? Complicit?

The current parliament attacked, arrested and ransacked the home of courageous whistle-blower Barry Young. More on Barry’s story is here, here and here. For those who don’t know, Barry was formerly employed as a Senior Database Administrator at Health New Zealand (HNZ) New Zealand. He was tasked to create and maintain a database that included the date and place experimental gene-technology jabs (bioweapons) were given and the date of death for any who died. In 2023, Barry became very concerned about patterns in the mortality data. He has often commented that he hoped he was wrong. He publicly said he reported his findings within HNZ and wrote to every MP. He had also approached veteran reporter Liz Gunn as he felt every moment counted, and he couldn’t bear to continue to look at what he perceived the statistics revealed, knowing it could be endangering New Zealanders. They had pored over the anonymised statistical data in great detail to confirm Barry was not mistaken. They reached out to world experts in the field who examined the data and confirmed Barry’s findings. Liz and Barry then made it public. Instead of showing genuine concern and interest in establishing the facts and withdrawing the jab while an investigation was done, the government did all they could to keep him quiet and have since put him through a form of protracted Lawfare. That’s not the work of an honest government, surely? Please help Barry by sharing these articles and keeping his name, and his courage to tell the truth, in lights. The government must know that New Zealanders will continue to ensure his story will not be submerged.

New Zealanders have been betrayed by those who purport to represent them. It is surely treason. For what is treason but betrayal after trust? It seems that the government represents others — global cabals pushing for global depopulation and a one-world government. It looks as though this is intended through orchestrated plandemics with lethal solutions through jabs, combined with escalating wireless frequencies that make people ill (5G, 6G +) and leading people to mistakenly believe it is another ‘virus’. This appears to be accompanied by escalating attempts of orchestrated famine (which has been done earlier in history) through lack of energy and supplies, escalating taxes and rates, artificially created weather disruption, criminal debt escalation in councils and government, and unlimited immigration that topples infrastructure, with a one world government (the UN) as the ‘solution’. It looks like the plan is then for 24/7 surveillance of any humans left on Earth with the only access to their money controlled by CBDC — digital currency. Look at the proliferation of cameras and 5G towers in recent years. That tells a story. Many concur that this is part of a plan to corral humanity into a world where Yuval Harrari of the World Economic Forum (WEF) tells us we will own nothing and we will be ‘happy’, our thoughts will no longer be our own, we will be fused with A.I. and we can ‘forget’ about our spiritual essence.

The documented global cabals (Club of Rome, Bilderberg Group, WEF, and others, with the UN and WHO in lockstep) just have the tightrope to walk where they have to persuade 7 billion of us that we have no power against the very few they are — these technocrats working in lockstep with corrupt governments.

But we do have the power. And they know this. But they don’t want you to know it.

It’s amazing isn’t it to see how the more criminal governments become, the more restrictions and surveillance they want on the people they are meant to be serving. When a government starts to push for this type of 24/7 surveillance and control and also try to water down our inalienable rights and freedoms, it seems clear that the government is working with criminal intent.

Would you dispute the proof that government pushed this bioweapon on the population while knowing it was harmful and could cause death? If so, scroll down this article here for a slide shot showing what the FDA knew of severe potential adverse events on 22 October 2020. That was before the first jab was given in New Zealand. Then there is the list of adverse events (the last nine pages) of this poison shot from Pfizer. This is dated 30 April 2021 and was later published on the orders of a US Judge. Pfizer knew of the serious potential adverse events — over 1200 of them. And under the 58 conditions of provisional consent Pfizer HAD to send their post-marketing data to the NZ government. It was sent to Medsafe in early 2021 and, according to an OIA, Medsafe advised the Ministry of Health (MoH), albeit “in a different form.” Bottom line? They had the data. They did not inform New Zealanders, so New Zealanders were unable to give fully informed consent.

Regardless, they all know about it now, and this lethal injection is still available.  Intentionally. Why is that?

If further proof is required — as mentioned in earlier articles — take a look at the outstanding document, Critique of the Official New Zealand Covid Response with a Focus on the use of Vaccines: What the Evidence Says. This was prepared by New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science (NZDSOS) for the Royal Commission of Inquiry 2 (RCI-2). It is written in an easy to understand format. All 362 pages of it. The factual evidence provided is compelling. Also read the clearly written facts presented to the RCI 2 by Reality Check Radio:  The People’s Position.  Listen to the submission from The Health Forum and the television documentary series that features the stories of the vaccine injured in The Tribute. Stories in The Tribute are from those injured who have received ACC payouts as a result of their injuries after testimony and verification from specialists. This is not to invalidate those who have yet to receive compensation as there are shocking blocks to this process by public servants, many of whom received an exemptions.

To a true artist only that face is beautiful which, quite apart from its exterior, shines with the truth within the soul. — Mahatma Gandhi

NZDSOS outlined in an article in 2022, that government sources estimate only about 5% of adverse events from pharmaceuticals are reported. They noted that: “In the 10 months of 2021 from the start of the vaccine rollout, CARM received over 45,000 reports just for the Pfizer vaccine. This included over 2,000 reports of serious events and 133 deaths. (17)  If only 5% of reactions are reported, these numbers could be 20 times higher.” (NZDSOS has  added that the final tally of serious symptoms was over 24,000 by the time public-facing reports were taken down)

This was a voluntary form-filling exercise (which should have been compulsory for an experimental injection) by the doctor that would have taken about 15 minutes to complete, which is apparently longer than many consultations. The doctors who did this had no incentive for doing so. Presumably they did it as they wanted the suffering of their patients to be known. The publicly visible tally is no longer available. Is that because there were too many reports for the government? Apparently, data has been hidden. Further information can be found here and here. And it is still on the market. Freely available.

ACC has paid over $19 million in compensation to those who have suffered severe injury and bereavement. (This is despite, as mentioned, their despicable attempts and that of  many doctors, who tried to invalidate and belittle the “vaccine” injured.)  It is understood that each patient who received compensation from ACC was required to have the confirmation of the “vaccine” injury from two specialists.

As mentioned in earlier articles, the submissions of over 30,000 New Zealanders to the Royal Commission of Inquiry 2 (RCI-2) tell the story, as the majority reveal what was really happening. There are stories from those who refused, those who were mandated and felt trapped into taking something they didn’t want, stories from relatives of those who died after the injection, and of those who were seriously injured and now suffer life-long illness as a result.

They are shocking, heart-breaking testimonies from those who were forced to take the injections or lose their ability to survive or maintain a home for their families. Loved ones were injured. And died. They are a traumatised people whose ranks are growing each day. Many have died from these jabs. So many, many, thousands have been injured. Their stories tell of a sustained betrayal of New Zealanders. Husbands, wives, parents, children, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, cousins, dear friends, They are our people.

It was, and still is, a form of sustained psychological abuse and medical rape.

The injuries from being forced into such a position may not be clearly apparent, but they simmer throughout the country, for most New Zealanders now know they have been shockingly betrayed by those they pay to represent them, and by medical staff to whom they turned to for help but who cannot, because if they want to keep their jobs they are forced to walk in lockstep.

Mainstream media were paid to carry the lies and propaganda, until recently, when apparently the taxpayer-funded money to them has dried up and reporters like Derek Cheng of the New Zealand Herald now appears to be permitted to investigate some aspects of this devastating crime against humanity. Even so, the Herald hide this vital information — of national interest and importance that every New Zealander needs to know —behind a paywall. Cheng highlighted injury from the so-called vaccines and also recently questioned why Bloomfield did not change the mandates for teenagers when he knew they had an unnecessary risk of the serious condition of myocarditis (heart inflammation) with a second dose. Again, he was one of the key figures — along with Hipkins, Ardern and Verrall and probably many more — who knew this and recklessly ignored it. A third jab, although not mandated, was also approved for this age group. Cheng rightly asks why Bloomfield won’t answer questions about it.

Shouldn’t those who knew of the dangers and pushed and mandated this bioweapon on the population be answering to their crimes? Why are they still in positions in the WHO, or being considered as a future leader of the UN? What are they doing in the NZ parliament, one of whom is ensconced as the leader of the Labour Party in New Zealand, another sitting as a list MP for Labour? How can they be trusted after this? How can any of them be in parliament when the bioweapon is still available and they remain mute? Does this give a hint of the degree of corruption within all of these areas?

If you are in parliament and are reading this then I urge you to speak out. For your country, for those you say you represent, for your family. And for you.

Justice Watch New Zealand (JWNZ) provides a positive move towards justice for all New Zealanders. JWNZ is made up of private individuals who are undertaking a structured examination of whether the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in New Zealand may give rise to criminal liability under the law. This work arises from the situation in which serious harm and death have been acknowledged in association with COVID-19 vaccination, and where such outcomes, if occurring without lawful justification, properly give rise to scrutiny under the criminal law.”

JWNZ makes it clear that New Zealanders are protected by a framework of domestic and international law:

Constitutional and Legal Protections New Zealanders are protected by a framework of domestic and international law designed to restrain state power and safeguard individual rights.

The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 affirms and protects fundamental civil and political rights, including the right to life, freedom from cruel or degrading treatment, the right to refuse medical treatment, protection from unreasonable search or seizure, and the right to natural justice.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which New Zealand is bound, protects the inherent right to life, equality before the law, and freedom from arbitrary interference.

Constitutional protections are enforceable. In Fitzgerald v R [2021] NZSC 131, the Supreme Court confirmed that serious breaches of protected rights require effective remedies. The State must remain within the limits of lawful authority, and accountability mechanisms exist where it does not.

Justice Watch New Zealand Inc. stands for democratic government under law, equal protection of rights, and the enduring principle that the law governs the State.

JWNZ has prepared the “Framework for a Criminal Investigation: COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Harm in New Zealand” and formally commenced A structured examination of evidence relating to serious harm and death associated with COVID-19 vaccination in New Zealand. Their website displays powerful and strategic Open Letters to the United Nations, the Prime Minister and government, among others.

Members include current and past members of the legal profession and law enforcement as well as the medical profession. Their work is a gift to New Zealanders. It is outstanding work by experts in their fields of law, investigation and medicine. Donations from New Zealanders will help them further this work.

For justice to be done, it has to be seen to be done. Our voices matter. Please, keep standing up and speaking out.

The silent majority needs to also speak up and/or donate to those speaking up, where you can. Not out of a sense of hate, vengeance, or revenge, for that feeds their evil. Instead, out of a sense of justice and putting things right, so we can create the tomorrow we want for our people and our country. One of peace, love, happiness, and good health where we know, and retain, our sovereignty and human rights.

Time is of the essence. Many of us have carried the majority on our shoulders for six long years. We will keep going and we will triumph over this evil. Miracles do happen. You can count on it. However, we could do with many more New Zealanders and people around the world standing beside us, peacefully saying NO, and demonstrating this with peaceful non-compliance. Thank you.

Bless you all.

Truth alone will endure. All the rest will be swept away before the tide of time. — Mahatma Gandhi.