17.5 C
Wednesday, May 18, 2022
-- Free Advertisement --spot_img
HomeWorldMore dodgy coincidences in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial

More dodgy coincidences in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial

Most Popular

This week Daily Telegraph posted an article featuring a video by US journalist Kim Iverson which showed some strange coincidences in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.

Iverson explained how the appointment of Maurene Comey as lead prosecutor in the case was highly unconventional. Maurene Comey is the daughter of Clinton Deep State operative James Comey. James Comey was the head of the FBI, and made the decision not to prosecute Hilary Clinton for alleged crimes pertaining to classified information during the 2016 Presidential Election.

Coincidences in Ghislaine Maxwell trial

Further, witnesses that would have provided damning testimony against Ghislaine Maxwell were not called upon by the prosecution to give evidence. Clearly these witnesses have aspects to their evidence which would have implicated certain other people. To prevent that embarrassment, or risk of inciminating certain third parties, they were left off the witness list, a decision which would have been made by Maurene Comey as lead prosecutor.

But there’s more dodgy coincidences involving the legal set up of the case.

Judge Alison Nathan:

  • Appointed by Obama in 2011. Prior to that she was an associate White House Counsel and Special Assistant to Obama.
  • A member of Cornell’s secret society, Quill & Dagger, which is much like Yale’s notorious Skull & Bones Society.
  • Judge Nathan granted request to keep secret “sensational” information, to “protect the privacy of third parties”.
  • At the behest of Senator Chuck Schumer, President Joe Biden just nominated her to the U.S. Court of Appeals – one step away from the Supreme Court of the United States.

The Prosecution

In addition to Maurene Comey’s connections to the Clinton family:

This is not to say that Ghislaine Maxwell is innocent, or that she is going to be unfairly tried.

What it does show is how easy it is for the powerful to stack the court with their operatives to ensure damaging information of high public interest doesn’t come out about certain members of the Washington swamp. It demonstrates how an apparently objective process like the law can easily be influenced by those with the right connections. And this is especially so when the legacy mainstream media don’t raise legitimate questions about the constitution of the court and prosecution, and don’t scrutinise prosecutorial decisions.

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please remember to keep comments respectful. We believe in free speech. Unfortunately, due the actions of one online troll, we have had to implement a manual moderation system to ensure online discussion remains civil and constructive. Your views and voice are important. Your comment will be published after moderation unless it contains hate speech or defamatory statements.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Daily Life

scattered clouds
15.7 ° C
16.2 °
15 °
93 %
46 %
15 °
17 °
17 °
13 °
14 °
- Donate -spot_img
- Make Your Voice Heard -spot_img