Tuesday, May 19, 2026

Latest

Cybersecurity expert claims double standard in insider trading enforcement

US lawmakers insider trading

Cybersecurity expert Peter Girnus has sparked debate online after highlighting what he described as a stark contrast in how insider trading laws are enforced in the United States.

In a widely shared post, Girnus pointed to the prosecution of a U.S. soldier accused of profiting from privileged information, while alleging that similar conduct among lawmakers routinely goes unpunished.

Referencing the case of a Special Forces soldier Gannon Ken Van Dyke charged with multiple federal offences after allegedly using confidential knowledge to place bets on Venezuelan president Nicholas Maduro’s removal from power, Girnus noted the severity of the response, including potential decades in prison. He contrasted this with what he described as a pattern of financial disclosures by members of Congress that reveal well-timed trades linked to non-public information, but result in minimal consequences.

“In 2021, fifty-four members of Congress and senior staff violated the reporting rules. The fines were minimal. Most were waived”, said Girnus.

“A senator on the Armed Services Committee sold defense contractor shares worth $1.2 million. Three days later, his committee received a classified briefing that the Iran campaign had exceeded its projected cost by 340%. The stock dropped 8%. He filed the disclosure sixty-one days late. I calculated the fine. $200. His chief of staff asked if it could be waived. He did not ask what the senator traded on. Nobody asks that. The form does not have a field for it. I waived the fine. The senator’s portfolio returned 23.4% in 2025. The S&P 500 returned 16.8%.

“A representative on the Energy and Commerce Committee bought pharmaceutical stocks worth $400,000. Two weeks later, her committee advanced a bill that would extend patent exclusivity for the exact drug class she purchased. The stocks rose 14%. She filed on time. There was no fine. There was no investigation. There was nothing to investigate because buying stocks in companies regulated by your own committee is not illegal. It is legal. The STOCK Act made it legal by making it disclosed. In Congress, disclosed means legal. In my office, legal means filed.



“A member whose spouse manages a portfolio worth $9.2 million reported forty-three separate transactions in a single quarter. Twelve of them were in sectors directly affected by legislation the member co-sponsored. The timing on eight of those twelve was within a two-week window of committee action. I logged all forty-three. None were flagged. We do not flag. We file.

“Nancy Pelosi entered Congress in 1987 with a portfolio worth approximately $785,000. It is now worth $133.7 million. That is a return of 16,930%. The Dow Jones returned 2,300% over the same period. Professional fund managers who beat the market for three consecutive years are considered exceptional. She has beaten it for thirty-seven. If a hedge fund produced those returns, the SEC would subpoena the records on a Thursday. She produced them from a building with a chapel and a gift shop. She announced her retirement last year. No investigation was opened. No disclosure was flagged. Her filings were on time. In my office, on time means compliant. Compliant means closed.”

Late financial disclosures by lawmakers often incur only minor penalties—typically around $200—which are frequently waived. Girnus argued that despite hundreds of millions of dollars in trades by elected officials each year, there have been no prosecutions under the STOCK Act since its introduction in 2012. “The difference… is not what they did. It is the building they did it in,” he wrote.

Calls for reform have persisted for years, with multiple legislative proposals introduced to restrict or ban stock trading by elected officials, though none have yet been enacted.

Support DTNZ

DTNZ is committed to bringing Kiwis independent, not-for-profit news. We're up against the vast resources of the legacy mainstream media. Help us in the battle against them by donating today.

Promoted Content

No login required to comment. Name, email and web site fields are optional. Please keep comments respectful, civil and constructive. Moderation times can vary from a few minutes to a few hours. Comments may also be scanned periodically by Artificial Intelligence to eliminate trolls and spam.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Wellington
clear sky
13.3 ° C
13.3 °
13.3 °
75 %
4.5kmh
9 %
Tue
13 °
Wed
14 °
Thu
15 °
Fri
14 °
Sat
15 °




Sponsored



Trending

Sport

Daily Life

Opinion

More News