All Cause Mortality Rises Around The World. New Zealand Government is Failing to Warn our Population of Links.
A study published in the prestigious journal Nature entitled “Increased emergency cardiovascular events among under-40 population in Israel during vaccine rollout and third COVID-19 wave” has found that incidence of emergency medical call outs for cardiac events is statistically related to Pfizer mRNA vaccination but not related to Covid infection. The study says:
“…the findings raise concerns regarding vaccine-induced undetected severe cardiovascular side-effects and underscore the already established causal relationship between vaccines and myocarditis, a frequent cause of unexpected cardiac arrest in young individuals.”
In New Zealand an article in Stuff reports a rise in cardiac events and a reduced survival rate in 2020/2021:
“Fewer New Zealanders are surviving cardiac arrests that occur outside of hospital, with survival rates down for the second consecutive year – a fact experts believe is linked to disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic”
The NZ government is not releasing current data concerning hospital admissions for cardiac problems. In contrast the Israeli study concludes:
“Surveillance of potential vaccine side-effects and COVID-19 outcomes should incorporate emergency call out and other health data to identify public health trends and promptly investigate potential underlying causes.”
The New Zealand government is still maintaining that mRNA vaccination reduces the risk of hospitalisation and death despite its own figures which show that hospitalisation rates among the boosted are higher than those of the unvaccinated. Moreover a Danish study in the Lancet reports that mRNA vaccines do not reduce mortality.
In a quick round up, we can report that all cause mortality has risen in a wide range of countries coinciding with vaccine rollouts. Rises have been reported in Canada, Cyprus, US, EU, and here in NZ. Hospitals in the UK are reporting large rises in the volume of cardiac cases. Birmingham NHS up 87% in 2021. Blackpool NHS up 400% in 2021, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ up 400% in 2021. We have already covered the rise in insurance claims for death among working age people in the USA and the high incidence of vaccine injuries in the armed forces.
The point I wish to make is that the New Zealand government is aboard the Titanic rearranging the deckchairs, apparently regarding multiple reports of vaccine injury and death as normal. The general public has been kept in the dark.
In an April 12th Ministry of Health release Dr Ashley Bloomfield said:
“COVID-19 has highlighted that making evidence based health decisions is good for the country’s wellbeing and economy.”
Which evidence is Dr. Bloomfield using?
Today I received a message from a friend. A 17 year old relative collapsed at the roadside with heart pains. The response of her parents to a suggestion that it could be vaccine related: “you must be joking”. This is where government information has left the public. The risks are real but the information is not.
This makes me terribly sad, because it goes against the duty of care that our government and medical system owes the public. Young people are at risk of cardiac events following vaccination, but the risks are largely absent from the vaccine promotional advertising.
Who writes the advertising copy and who approves it? The Brothers Grimm? This is not a casual matter of minor misrepresentation, this is unconscionable.
Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a food testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID). Website: HatchardReport.com.
Guy is the author of ‘Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness’.
NZ government is not only releasing full data and also biases it. Whatever released is vague and absolves Pfizer by design. When it comes to those pro-health public who choose not to be jabbed, the data is biased in the opposite direction to what they did with the data of those who got jabbed. When the system acts only on its own self interest and not in the interest of the people it serves, it deserves to be completely dismantled. We need a Royal Commission to investigate what really happened in the last two years.
The claims made here in NZ contradicts with the international evidence more often than not. This itself is a clear justification for why we cannot trust our “Ministry of truth”.
i absolutely agree with you , but could we trust a royal commission ? all our institutions are captured. we haven’t been in this situation before , we have to rebuild from the bottom up . but first people have to wake up .
Does it really matter what the jabbed population think? They got the Jab, happy in the thought that they are now safe. They cannot be unjabbed, so of course they will argue that all this uptick in cardio vascular ailment is coincidental. The jabbed will argue that their ailments are normal, or now caused by long covid.
Likewise, does it really matter what the unjabbed think? They refused the Jab, happy in the thought that they are now safe. The stats would probably point the unjabbed aren’t suffering an uptick in cardio vascular illness?
I don’t worry about decisions other people have made about their health. It was their business, and not my concern. Just as, my not getting jabbed is my business, and no one else’s concern. If you made health decisions to get jabbed or not, for you or anyone other than yourself, that is something you will need to deal with. So I rationalise, all the adult who got jabbed, in my circles, had the same opportunity to do the same research as I did. Maybe come to the same conclusions as most of us here have.
Like right now, I really don’t know if the jab works. I’m not jabbed. I know many in households with both jabbed and unjabbed people. Some jabbed/unjabbed didn’t catch it. So for all I know the the jabb could be fake?
What really matters is the truth. Something I think our authorities have trouble communicating to their clients. Us the people.
Only a few would have given an informed consent. Most who got jabbed were poorly informed. Jabcinda used the media and all government machinery to manufacture consent for political gains. This is highly immoral. Those who got jabbed, knowingly or unkowingly, become fully responsible under law. This is like joining facebook. Most just tick the box on reading the terms and conditions, which runs into many pages, written in technical and legalistic language. Facbook/Meta protects itself under law for stealing private information and selling them. The same applies to the action of the government who just want to cover their arse rather than really taking steps to hold the principle of serving public, adhering to Nuremberg code etc.
Being an experimental therapy, there is no way of fully knowing the good and bad of jabbing and yet the government pushed just one side of the story on the public.
I have said this before, we live near a main road. The number of sirens over the last 6 months is unbelievable. Our local fire siren goes off all the time. I recently learnt that all these stations respond not just to fire calls but ‘code purple’ calls – which are life threatening events – including cardiac.
Coincidence? No I don’t think so.
Essential viewing : https://galleries.vidflow.co/awitness