New Zealanders call for an immediate end to Crimes Against Humanity

Many people, especially ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth, for being correct, for being you. Never apologize for being correct, or for being years ahead of your time. If you’re right and you know it, speak your mind. Speak your mind. Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is still the truth. — Mahatma Gandhi

Over the last four years New Zealanders, along with millions of living souls all over the world — whether they had the government-recommended COVID-19 injections or not — were either frightened or divided by a continual stream of lies and propaganda. The chief culprits in NZ were the former government —regrettably endorsed by a weak opposition — aided and abetted by a mainstream media that was funded to promote the government rhetoric and lies. They needed little encouragement to trash those who — at great cost to themselves — declined to have the experimental injection and in many cases courageously spoke out against it.

Regardless of whether Kiwis willingly had the injection, or refused to take it, or were forced to take it under the threat of losing their jobs, their homes, and their families, our people were attacked — either physically, through the injection contents, or through mainstream media working in concert with government to mount a scathing singling-out of the unvaccinated. All manner of restrictions followed the advertised ‘safe and effective’ mantra and included lockdowns, mandates, loss of jobs, businesses, loss of family and friends, and loss of the ability to move freely in society and to be able to continue to run businesses, get a haircut, a driver’s licence, have a local swim, or be part of a sports team. The government and media continued to orchestrate a relentless campaign of fear to drive Kiwis towards the experimental injections and to intentionally escalate the divide between the injected and the un-injected.

The chief weapons used on everyone were fear and lies — through briefings from the ‘podium of truth’ and an unrelenting pressure that consistently sought to employ the age-old strategy of divide and conquer.

Those who refused the injection were indeed singled out and ostracised, yet those who received it were also treated abominably, with almost all of those who were subsequently injured, or bereaved, being deserted by the government. Most were gas-lit by doctors and medical staff who blatantly denied their injuries were anything to do with the jab. They were often sent for all manner of tests while red-herrings were chased to give the appearance of doing something to ‘investigate’ the symptoms, when they probably already knew they were looking at a range of adverse events from the experimental injection. Instead, they tried to persuade the injured they were suffering from ‘anxiety’ or that they were schizophrenic and, in at least one case, were erroneously put on psychiatric drugs to ‘cure’ an illness that wasn’t there, resulting in patients then having to battle additional side-effects from that medication as well. Many were treasonously allocated maladies they did not have, while the nine pages of adverse events [pages 30-38] that Pfizer were forced to make public were not given so much as a glance. That is, in my view, a particularly cruel and treasonous psychological torture of injured souls who had come to medical staff for help.

There was further trauma for those who never wanted it but felt forced to take it due to the mandates and the threat of losing their jobs and being unable to provide for their families. In addition to the belittling and denial of injuries related to the jab, they had also felt physically assaulted and medically raped when they felt forced to submit to it against their will. Many still find it difficult to speak of at all, because the perceived treason of most in the medical profession working in lockstep with government, feels just too much. And those who have had this jab — whether injured or not — and have since become aware of the nine A4 pages of possible adverse events that was kept from them at the time, quietly worry if they will face any of these injuries in the future. To put a patient in such a situation is criminal. Ironically, those who are demonstrably assisting the injured and bereaved today are mainly the medical staff who were ostracised, publicly humiliated, and de-registered but continue to strongly stand by their principles. You’ll find many of these wonderful souls at the NZDSOS clinic that has been a bastion of comfort and assistance for the injured and bereaved since it opened. They also take calls from anyone in need of assistance.

Medical staff still within the system may protest their innocence, saying they did not know of these side effects. Perhaps, but when your patient has had experimental injections, the total contents of which you did not know, why would medical staff doggedly persist with tests and assessments for other maladies, while completely neglecting to investigate if their sudden symptoms post-jab were related to the experimental injection the patient recently had? Was it because they were ordered to neglect the most senior principles of their profession by various medical councils who were working in concert with the former government and their off-shore masters, while the precious few who refused to betray the Hippocratic Oath, the Bill of Rights, and the Nuremberg Code, were harassed, ostracised, publicly censured, dragged through expensive litigation and de-registered? Shouldn’t it be the councils (MCNZ and NCNZ) and those that fell into line who should be held to account? In earlier times, the term for that was collaborators.

Even when the symptoms were acknowledged to be caused by the injection, the torture of those affected did not stop there. It was up to them to apply to ACC for compensation. You know, that bastion of comfort that a good deal of our taxes goes towards, to ensure that Kiwis, through accident —medical or otherwise — have their medical bills paid and the basics covered to help them through? But this government department with their slick advertising campaigns and empty expressions of care, weren’t there for so many injured Kiwis. They even put the burden of proof on these injured and traumatised souls, some so ill they could barely maintain the daily tasks of living. A quick scan of the qualifications of the Board members of ACC appears to reflect that most have qualifications in accountancy, law, investment, or former government-related appointments in MIBE, or they have expertise in commercial procurements, finance and banking. There is a doctor of medicine, although this seems to have equal billing to the qualification of a Masters of Business Administration from Harvard. All very corporate.

Where is the heart? Where is the compassion? Where are those on the Board that genuinely care for these injured souls? Possibly they do, but surely there must be at least some balance among the corporate Board that have actual one-on-one experience with genuine care for the injured and/or bereaved, so that every Kiwi is supported in the best possible way following their injuries. Surely responsibility must be taken for those injured, who trusted the government when they promised this experimental injection was ‘safe and effective’ which is blatant lie. Yet, there are still advertisements fraudulently touting it as ‘safe and effective’, and even recommending pregnant woman have it, too, and all while too many of the injured are shunned by the very department that should be assisting them.

Did the government know of the adverse events? Ultimately, the question always remained whether or not the government knew of the nine A4 pages of adverse events listed by Pfizer. (Pfizer didn’t plan to release this information for 75 years — but a blessed American Judge ordered them to do so.)

Since July 2021 we have known that the government did know, as the courageous nzdsos.com website made this clear in an article published on 15 July 2021. That article can be seen here. This information should have been nation-wide news, but it was heavily censored. Why is that? Why would a government and mainstream media censor such vital information? Why wouldn’t the MCNZ and the NCNZ want to alert their members to this? Why wouldn’t the government immediately order a stop to this harmful injection?

Additional proof that the former government knew was confirmed this week when it was disclosed by Doctor Lily Nightingale that the government was aware of the nine pages of adverse events before any experimental injections were given in this country. It is worth viewing this five-minute interview with Liz Gunn, of Free NZ Media. It can be seen here. (For further information, check out the two links below the interview as well.) In one of the OIA’s, in reference to whether or not the government was aware of the nine pages of adverse events, it stated:

“However, I can advise that as a part of the provisional consent for the Comirnaty COVID-19 granted in New Zealand under the Medicines Act 1981, Pfizer has provided the same data, albeit in a form that meets the company’s legal obligations in New Zealand.”

It also stated in part of the OIA, “Death is not a side effect to vaccination but a possible outcome of a side effect . . .” It doesn’t take a Rhodes scholar to work out that if the experimental injection had not been given, there would be no side effect from it, and no death as a result of the side effect. They write and speak in riddles. Dr David Martin doesn’t.

Because of the lies and fear-mongering broadcast by the government and media, many were terrified of those who were not injected while, sadly, some tended to inadvertently ‘look down upon’ fellow Kiwis for having received it, intensifying their sense of isolation. But others rallied around them, giving them a safe space and a platform to tell their stories and, very importantly, also providing compassion, assistance, understanding, and practical steps they could take that would help address their symptoms. They listened. They helped. They continue to do so. Some of those amazing souls can be found at www.nzdsos.com and, as mentioned, at the clinic they run, as well as at The Health Forum.

There are some Kiwis who believe the advertised treatment works for them. It is their right to choose, as long as they are explicitly told of all potential side effects and are able to make a fully-informed decision. Some have experienced little or no side effects, but there were different batches — some with severe adverse events, while others were apparently harmless. Russian roulette.

There were so many injustices in this country where both sides — the jabbed and the un-jabbed — were gas-lit and divided by government. But, for the health of each other, and our nation, it so important that we to move on together, vowing to turn away from any future potential government-orchestrated fear campaigns that threaten to come between us in the future — no matter how horrific the graphics or the staged videos are that may be used in an attempt to terrorise the world again. Never.

The government lied, and betrayed the trust of all New Zealanders in the worst of ways, so how are we able to trust them now in any area of government? If they don’t represent us, who do they represent?

Many thousands of Kiwis suffered adverse events. If they had truthfully been given all of the factual information in regard to it most would have run a country mile. Who wouldn’t? Imagine the lack of uptake if the government and doctors had read out the nine pages of adverse events before anyone received a shot.

There were countless numbers of Kiwis who uncontrollably sobbed as they put their arms out for the unwanted injection, which shows just how very far this was from informed consent, the Hippocratic Oath (First, Do No Harm) and the Nuremberg Code. For many it was indeed a form of medical rape.

When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall… think of it, always. — Mahatma Gandhi

This is a crime against humanity. All involved must be held to account. Proper trials must be commenced. Our people are suffering and the lies and torture must stop now.

But here we are in 2024 with a Royal Commission of Inquiry that still seems to have a person in charge of it who was at the forefront of the terrible lock-downs in Victoria under the WEF despot, Dan Andrews. Professor Blakely was appointed by the former government to ‘prepare New Zealand for future pandemics through lessons learned from COVID-19’. This statement seems chilling, for the only way one could possibly KNOW if there were to be ‘future pandemics’ is if one was aware of those orchestrating them wouldn’t it?

In announcing this Royal Commission, the former PM alleged that the COVID-19 emergency was the most significant threat to the health of New Zealanders and our economy since World War II. But that COVID-19 was to blame was a lie, for it has been well-proven that what was described as ‘COVID-19’ would put people at no more risk than that of a ‘flu. The threat to New Zealanders was the orchestrated fear, accompanied by the experimental gene-based therapy injection that was forced on the population and constantly touted as ‘safe and effective’. And again, that phrase is another shocking lie.

Vaccination is a barbarous practice and one of the most fatal of all the delusions current in our time. Conscientious objectors to vaccination should stand alone, if need be, against the whole world, in defence of their conviction. — Mahatma Gandhi

The Royal Commission of Inquiry is apparently the ‘highest form of public Inquiry, yet its terms of reference simply request that it, “. . . look at the overall response, including the economic response, identify what we can learn from it and how that can be applied to any future pandemic.”

Oh, please, pass the can of white paint and a brush. Let’s have a whitewash. The terms of reference appear weak, generalised, and achieve nothing. Barely lip service. There is no serious attempt to investigate the harm caused by the experimental injection that was enforced upon most through lies and pressure and without informed consent. The government has offered no safe space for the injection-injured and the bereaved to be able to communicate or be immediately compensated; no investigation of the orders of the MCNZ (Medical Council New Zealand) or the NZNC (New Zealand Nurses Council) to members that forbade them from providing negative information about the experimental injection, thereby throwing out the most sacred oaths in medicine and cutting off their ability to prescribe a safe alternative medicine recommended by world-renowned cardiologists, who are also calling for an end to the experimental injections due to the severe harm that has been caused. Nor does there seem to be any requirement for a study of the anonymised statistical information of the government that was made public by the courageous whistle-blower, Barry Young.

NZDSOS provides an accurate assessment of the Royal Commission of Inquiry here. They call for the government-appointed commissioners to be replaced and the terms of reference to be expanded to make it more meaningful by investigating, at the very least, whether the experimental injection was safe and effective, or not. They call for accountability and want those who were injured and bereaved to have a voice. And they call for it to be public. All vital points.

The Chair of the Royal Commission, Professor Tony Blakely and another commissioner, John Whitehead, were the only two government-appointed Commissioners. They were checked out by www.nzdsos.com. Chillingly, Professor Blakely stated:

“. . .that the purpose of the inquiry was not to apportion blame but to pick out the tools and generic lessons learned so that the country is able ‘to do the next pandemic well’ i.e. better contact tracing, better ability to do surge testing. He noted the tools will be different for the next pandemic because ‘we’ll be able to produce mRNA vaccines a lot quicker’ and ‘will have a better understanding of how to do managed quarantine at the border”

Business as usual then? The tools sound exactly the same. How can that occur before they have completed their Royal Commission of Inquiry? How can anyone trust this Inquiry with these intentions? Especially with the assumption mRNA jabs would be continued when so much damage has been caused. It seems a fact-finding mission on how to better round up the public for Act 2. Well, we don’t want them or their next terror-fuelled ‘plandemic’ accompanied by their shocking graphics that would again terrify the population and drive them into the ‘gas-chambers’ of the 21st century.

The NZDSOS assessments of the government-appointed commissioners can be seen here and here, and give cause for substantial concern. Surely, with this in mind, and the fact that New Zealand has a new government, the current members of this Inquiry should be replaced, with the terms of reference expanded to ensure the Inquiry is not a farce? Nor is the government bound to follow the advice of an Inquiry, so if it did result in a renewed affirmation that freedom of choice and all aspects of the Bill of Rights were to remain sacrosanct, the government could ignore it. And for the Inquiry to have transparency, as Alia Bland of Reality Check Radio noted, the Inquiry should not be behind closed doors, rather it should be transparent and broadcast. How can any New Zealander obtain closure without that?

The Royal Commission of Inquiry seems to have brought the foxes into the chicken house asking the chooks to come forward and confide in them about what was troubling about being injured, having loved ones die from the jab, being locked up, losing one’s home, family, business, livelihood, and to tell the commissioners “how they could do it better next time.” It is the equivalent of a rape victim being asked to say why they felt invaded — mind, body and soul — and how it could be done better next time. It is an extremely cruel form of psychological torture. And there is no trust. Not with any architects of the lockdowns as commissioners. This should not have to be spelt out.

There seems a glimmer of hope though, as the Deputy Prime Minister, Winston Peters, referred to this Inquiry in a speech he gave outside parliament, to NZDSOS on 29 February 2024, when NZDSOS presented him with an Open Letter to parliament calling for an immediate halt to the harmful experimental jabs. Winston raised the issue of the Royal Commission of Inquiry and said that in the last campaign when they went to Whangarei “ . . . we promised we will get rid of that Inquiry that had deficient Terms of Reference and therefore deficient representation by means of the inquirers themselves, because if the terms of reference were deficient, then any capable, competent person would have said, “ I’m not going to sit on that Inquiry.” And that’s why we ruled them out as well. And what I promised in Whangarei we will deliver on.”

Civil disobedience becomes a sacred duty when the state becomes lawless or corrupt. — Mahatma Gandhi

However, there has been some confusion between the Royal Commission of Inquiry and an Independent COVID Inquiry instigated by New Zealand First, as part of the coalition agreement. Subsequently, wider terms of reference (ToR) have been requested from the public and those are being sent to the RCI which seems to indicate there is just one Inquiry. A person within New Zealand First was contacted about this and asked to confirm that the Royal Commission is NOT the Independent COVID Inquiry. They said: “You are 100% correct and it is a vital and imperative point of difference. Further, NZF negotiated that the Inquiry would be independent in the coalition agreement, so National agreed.” The relevant excerpt from the coalition agreement was attached and stated:

“Ensure, as a matter of urgency in establishment and completion, a full scale, wide ranging, independent inquiry conducted publicly with local and international experts, into how the Covid pandemic was handled in New Zealand, including covering:

• Use of multiple lockdowns,
• Vaccine procurement and efficacy,
• The social and economic impacts on both regional and national levels, and
• Whether the decisions made, and steps taken, were justified.”

However, it appears this will be done within the RCI, albeit with different commissioners and with wider terms of reference that mean something, based on what Winston said in his recent speech and as stated in the coalition agreement.

The international battle has not only been for our bodies, but also for our minds and our souls. They want the lot. If you consider this statement too outlandish, check out what Schwab’s side-kick, Harari, says here. It’s just as the long-pilloried, but now internationally-popular, David Icke says: We need to look at where they are intending to lead us in order to connect the dots of the journey. Then it all fits into place.

Aside from the medical tyranny, and whether you’ve had the injection or not, they’re after everything, including our homes, our savings, our families and yes, even the shirts off our backs. Please also take a look at the book, The Great Taking, written by David Webb, that further explains the plans of the despots.(He was also interviewed on solutions.) Schwab (of the WEF) said: “You will own nothing and you will be happy.” What Schwab omitted to say though, was that he and his masters intended to own everything after, of course, disposing of the rest of us. Well, many of us have news for him and his associated cabals: That’s just not going to happen. We do not consent.

The next attacks planned for humanity include cyber-attacks that may take down banks and vital infrastructure as a means to ushering in digital currency, among other things that you won’t want to queue up for. Clips of Schwab describing this can be found here. Also, ‘Plandemic’ X has already been discussed at the last World Economic Forum (WEF) in Switzerland).

On a more positive note, increasing numbers of souls all over the world are uniting in the quest to ensure the protection of our Human Rights, our food sources, and our freedom from tyranny. Each day it grows. Love, compassion, understanding, communication, and the truth of what is happening, and why, are the bridges where we powerfully connect with each other, and those bridges are rapidly being built on sturdy foundations.

Strength does not come from physical capacity. It comes from an indomitable will. — Mahatma Gandhi

We need more courageous Kiwis like Barry Young, too. His story flew around the world because Liz Gunn had the foresight to simultaneously send it out to courageous national and international independent media and lone politicians — like Andrew Bridgen in the UK — who were taking a stand on the opposite side of the world. Sadly, the NZ government embarrassed itself by sending armed police to Barry’s home on a Sunday afternoon where they arrested him and put him in a police car while they bashed his door down and trashed his home under the title of ‘a search’ while Barry, having just returned from the supermarket, was ‘armed’ with nothing more than a dog-roll. But they hadn’t counted on public opinion swinging so strongly in favour of Barry. He is now rightfully greeted as a hero wherever he goes, because he was courageous enough to stand up and tell New Zealanders what he knew, because the thought of what could be done to him didn’t come close to the devastation to Kiwis that he was seeing unfold before his eyes, in his role as a statistician for the Ministry of Health. He couldn’t bear for any more Kiwis to be injured or killed. This is what integrity looks like. He cared.

Not all heroes wear capes.

The government would have been applauded if it had simply put out a statement saying that they were grateful to Barry for coming forward and would like time to thoroughly investigate the information and go over it with him. And, in the meantime, all experimental injections would be immediately halted. That would make sense for a government of goodwill that cared for every Kiwi, wouldn’t it?

Just as the courageous holocaust survivor, Vera Sharav, said: “Unless all of us resist, never again is now.” She is right, for it is in these desperate days we need all New Zealanders peacefully standing on the Front of this almighty battle for humanity to ensure it never happens again. There is no time to waste.

Yet, as mentioned earlier in this article, there are some hopeful signs of positive change with NZ First back in power as part of a coalition with National and ACT, as Winston Peters met NZDSOS outside parliament on 29 February 2024 and accepted an open letter detailing the many reasons why the ‘COVID’ injection must be immediately stopped. (The brief clip is worth watching.) He promised to read it and make sure it was given to parliament. In addition to his comments on how the Inquiry would change, he also admitted that in early 2020 he believed in the jab but later that year he was receiving scientific medical advice about it that deeply alarmed him. He told listeners that, “We will listen to better advice because I’m certain Matt [Dr Matt Shelton of NZDSOS] is telling me something that I’ve been studying in other jurisdictions, including the UK, on the question of whether or not there are things happening that need to be addressed right here, right now, hitherto unaddressed by this parliament.” He assured listeners they would look at it with a totally open mind uncompromised by positions they previously took. At last, there is a politician of Winston’s experience who is listening and says he will do what he is able to within the coalition.

We need each beautiful, individual soul — that Divine Spark within us all — to peacefully stand and simply say, ‘No. We’re not doing that. We do not consent.’ No, we will not administer experimental jabs that can harm and kill. No, we will not deny this ACC claim of this jab-injured soul, and we never will again. No, we will not take your experimental injections and/or spurious tests. No, we will not allow you to shun our children and remove them from their sports, deny their right to move about freely, or deny any of us our basic human rights ever again. No, we will not withhold the negative aspects of an experimental injection from patients. No, we will not withhold the information required for informed consent. No, we will not keep Kiwis from their loved ones and families, or force them to have unwanted tests. No, we will not allow anyone to stomp over our Human Rights as Sovereign Beings. And yes, we will support brave souls who dare to speak out and tell their truths.

We each have different strengths and abilities. We all approach major issues like this in varying beautiful ways, and that is just how it should be, for it weaves a wonderful, rich, tapestry with the same peaceful message — that we will not consent to anything that violates our integrity. None of us. Not the military, not the police or the medical staff, not the farmers, or the tradies, or the government employees, or the hospitality industry, or the mountain guides, or the writers, artists, sports men and women, or the retired. None of us.

We will support our injured and our bereaved. We will pick them up and carry them with us and allow them to help as they can, too, for that is the path towards healing for each of us.

Our country and our people — each Divine Spark — are too amazing for us to do anything else but look out for each other with love and compassion. We will peacefully speak out while there is breath in our bodies and good intentions in our hearts. We are all individuals and we peacefully stand for our freedoms together. We are the light that will never dim. And our love and compassion are the most powerful strengths of all.

They are few. We are many. Together we are Unstoppable.

Each of us having enough love in our hearts to speak out for our people, our country, and the world, and to peacefully not consent, will pave the way forward to a spectacular tomorrow that will enable us all to be able to live in peace and harmony.

Let’s get our country and our people back.

All photos © Mary Hobbs.