The Government is moving to overhaul how commercial fishers are charged for fish caught outside their quota, with changes aimed at better reflecting the actual value of fish depending on how it is landed.
Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones said the current deemed value system — which allows fishers to sell over-quota catch while paying a fee — does not work fairly for all operators. Under existing rules, deemed value rates are set uniformly across each fish stock, even though market values can vary significantly depending on whether fish are landed fresh or frozen.
Jones said feedback from industry consultation showed the one-size-fits-all approach was disadvantaging some of the most productive commercial fishers. Inshore species typically landed fresh by smaller coastal vessels attract premium prices, and deemed values are set accordingly. However, an increasing amount of inshore fish is now being taken as bycatch by deepwater freezer vessels, where long trips require fish to be frozen, sharply reducing its market value.
Despite this, those fishers are still charged deemed values based on higher fresh-market prices, creating what Jones described as a growing financial burden as inshore species expand their range. Proposed changes to be included in the Fisheries Act Amendment Bill would allow alternative deemed value rates to be set for inshore fish caught by deepwater freezer vessels, aligning charges more closely with actual sale values.
Jones also confirmed he has abandoned a proposal that would have allowed commercial fishers to land and sell marlin taken as bycatch, saying the benefits did not outweigh the concerns. Advice is still being sought on how other species should be treated.
The Fisheries Act Amendment Bill is expected to be introduced to Parliament in early 2026, with the public able to make submissions during the select committee process.
Image credit: Waldemar Brandt

Treaty obligations and General fisheries law.
The Māori Fisheries Act is built entirely on the 1992 settlement.
The Fisheries Amendment Bill is built on the Fisheries Act 1996.
Two legal frameworks, encompassing, running in parallel, overlapping in places, and neither fully subordinate to the other.
When they’re aligned, things run smoothly.
When they’re not, the system binds up.
And can hit snags⚠️
Caught any Mermaids in New Zealand waters lately?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGPnJkDlGMs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSG3kPa-jOU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TME8eXpKKhs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ElkSlBd1UA
Or snagged / netted any Israeli / Chinese / U.S. subs recently?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TylsieDiwNM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HV7D2oQ-k1k
Hmm, so how does a deep water vessel catch inshore fish as bycatch?
Excellent observation Syd.
Shane Jones is attempting to increase commercial fishing profits whilst risking the ire of kiwi voters whose most popular sport is fishing.
Why would a politician risk losing an election to increase the profits of a few large commercial fishing companies?