Right to Life commends the doctors, practice nurses and psychiatrists in New Zealand, who, in obedience to the fifth commandment of God, Thou shalt not kill, and to their medical ethics, have refused to cooperate with the government in the killing of “eligible” patients, in accordance with the appalling End of Life Choice Act 2019.
Right to Life requests that health professionals vigorously resist the efforts of the Ministry of Health, to entice them into betraying their medical ethics and become members of the workforce bringing death to the vulnerable in our community, under the guise that this is a health service.
The community have an inalienable right to trust their doctor to uphold the Hippocratic tradition to do no harm. Would you trust your doctor if you knew that he or she would be prepared to kill you as a treatment option?
Right to Life is encouraged to learn that many health professionals have withdrawn their support to the Ministry of Health’s SCENZ Group The SCENZ Group is responsible for making and maintaining lists of health professionals, who are willing to kill eligible patients with a lethal injection or assist in their suicide. These misguided health professionals are available when a patient’s general practitioner commendably refuses on conscience grounds to participate in the killing of a patient.
The Registrar of Assisted Dying, Dr Kristen Good has revealed in her annual report to the Minister of Health that in 2023 there were147 health professionals on the SCENZ list comprising, Attending Medical Practitioners [AMP], Independent Medical Professionals, [IMP], Nurse Practitioners and Psychiatrists.
Right to Life is pleased to note that in the annual report for 2025, it was revealed that the number of Attending Medical Professionals, had in spite of efforts to increase the number of doctors prepared to kill eligible patients, decreased from 147 to 126. Right to Life believes that this decrease is a result of these doctors realising that killing patients is contrary to medical ethics and violates their conscience and requests that those Medical Professionals still on the list uphold their medical ethics and resign.
Right to Life believes that Health New Zealand should not be training doctors to kill vulnerable patients. Why then is Health NZ anxious to encourage doctors to undertake training in providing assistance in suicide, and in providing a lethal injection to kill eligible patients? Health NZ provides mandatory training with five e- learning modules.
Right to Life was pleased to be advised recently by Professor Suzanne Pitama, Dean of the Otago Medical School in response to our Official Information Act request, that trainee doctors are not given any training in killing eligible patients with assistance in suicide or administering a lethal injection.
Since the 7 November 2021 to 30th June 2025, a total of 1,307 vulnerable patients were killed in New Zealand by a doctor with a lethal injection or assisted in their suicide. Since the introduction of the End of Life Choice Act on 7 November and the 31st December 2024:
- 837 patients were killed in their home.
- 94 in a Public Hospital.
- 134 in an aged care facility.
- 33 in a Hospice.
- 9 in a funeral home.
Right to Life will not rest until the End of Life Choice Act 2019 is repealed and asks the community to join us in the defence of life.
9 in a funeral home?? WTF. A funeral home, funeral parlor or mortuary is a business that provides burial, entombment and cremation services for the dead and their families.
I know a few ‘eligible’.
But they have fled the country.
Yes, flee the West, which is now full of Bolshevik’s who want free reign to do what they do best.
More emotive and misleading rhetoric. Tell us, how many of the roughly 1100 people “killed by their doctors “ were dragged in kicking and screaming, wailing “No, no, don’t do it, I want to live”? On the contrary, they requested the procedure themselves and fulfilled the necessary criteria. One chap I know of was cracking jokes up until his last moments. If your god can’t compassionately get his head around the fact that some people elect to end their life rather than endure intractable pain and suffering, then he.isn’t up to the job.
Phil, I am not sure if you grasp how legislation can be misused (was used) by totalitarian govts.
It stands to hope that private citizens will have enough foresight and will be able to make their own preparations, as it was for centuries. (Government, get OUT of my life!).
What society now needs to focus on is not that ‘assisted’ stuff.
The focus should be what is blatantly the bio-weaponized war-fare/law-fare. The criminals who killed, maimed, injured hundreds of thousands of Kiwis hide behind the smokescreen of -now- mercy-killing/euthanasia.
Yes, I am very aware of the possibility of “mission creep” over time and voiced my concerns at the possibility of this when the legislation was originally mooted. This is a reason for strong vigilance and advocacy, however, not for scrapping the act. I am not sure what point you are trying to make in the rest of your comment as it is not very coherent. I have no problem with opposition and debate, but I find emotive and misleading rhetoric obnoxious.
Logan’s Run meets Bladerunner…with an All-Blacks numbered jersey-
“I’ve seen things you people would not believe…”
“Quite an experience to live in fear…that’s what it’s like to be a slave.”
“There is no sanctuary.”
‘Logan Five…identify Ankh.”
The author of this article seems way off beam to me. Those so called ‘vulnerable patients’ chose to die voluntary. The real issue that the author should be targeting is the thousands of New Zealanders who had no desire to have an unscheduled death but were killed anyway by being jabbed in the arm with an unsafe and ineffective Covid ‘vaccine’.
Those doctors had no problem taking money from the government to cajole their patients into getting jabbed with a totally unproven, experimental injection. These same doctors are ‘baffled’ as to why their patients who haven’t yet ‘died suddenly’ are suffering from blood clots, heart attacks, fertility problems and turbo cancers.
I vehemently disagree with this article.
Having written my advanced care plan (in my 50’s) a few years ago, due to historic vaccine complications and immunological issues, I expect my well documented wishes surrounding death with dignity, to be honoured when my decision day comes.
I have no children, my parents are deceased and do not want to become a burden on the Health system.
I sincerely hope someone in the Medical fraternity will be on my page when the day arrives!
Do you have a ‘Green Sheet’ in your medical records?
In these times of recession and business failures, it’s probably a good idea to set up as an undertaker. I’d set up a funeral parlor named “Deaths R Us” and our motto would be “you slam em, we’ll slab em”. Should be profitable.
I’m in.
Motto could be: “Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, thoroughly used up, screaming ‘Yahoo! What a ride!'”,
Tell that to a homeless, disenfranchised, blacklisted, minimised Targeted Individual who had his / her E-Bike recently stolen…the only item they owned and was gifted to them!!
Their companion dog was also taken…such is the life of a Military Veteran in Western Societies!!!!!!
https://targetedjustice.com/
https://targetedjustice.com/what-is-a-ti%3F
Don’t worry; the above web page verifies why the 5-Eyes exist. If you think that these programs are only U.S.-based in location, rest assured that NZ has the various agencies tied-in to this ‘info-sharing’ and has similar ops going on here.
Just ask the Locke Family and Nicky Hagar…
Also, why do you think Judith now has allowed a fully-operational FBI Office into New Zealand, violating our sovereignty????
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m91QxUMrGek&list=RDm91QxUMrGek&start_radio=1
And what will Autism NZ and IDEA do when they come for the Autistic with the express purpose of euthanising them as well?
Probably nothing…but they will ask for sizable donations during that time…
Already happening in Canada, and the Netherlands…
Darwinism has no place in ANY ‘society!