An alarming message for the Royal Commissioners, media, medical authorities, scientists and MPs.
On 26th September 2025 a study entitled “1-year risks of cancers associated with COVID-19 vaccination: a large population-based cohort study in South Korea” was published in the journal Biomarker Research. It examined the health records of the 8.4 million residents of Seoul, South Korea enrolled in their National Health Insurance Scheme and compared the rate of cancer incidence for Covid vaccinated individuals to unvaccinated individuals. In this article we analyse the results in detail and draw conclusions that are vital for public policy formation.
The study compared the cancer incidence among people who had received at least two Covid vaccine doses between 2021 and 2023 with the cancer outcomes of unvaccinated individuals. It specifically compared the cancer outcomes of the vaccinated for the 12 months immediately following the completion of their vaccine course with the cancer record of the unvaccinated for the 12 months of 2022. There were a total of 600,000 people who were unvaccinated (8%) of the Seoul population. The two groups were carefully matched by age, gender, insurance status and comorbidities in order to exclude confounding factors. People who had previously had any cancer were excluded from the study, as were people who only received one Covid vaccine dose (300,000 people). The study also excluded people who died during the study period (30,000 people) and people whose vaccine records were incomplete (70,000 people).
About 80% of the vaccinated group received mRNA shots, (90% of these were Pfizer shots). 20% received adenovirus vector (cDNA) vaccines, mostly AstraZeneca or a mixture of vaccine types.
The key findings of this huge study were as follows:
- As a whole, there was a 27% increased risk of developing cancer within one year of Covid vaccination relative to the unvaccinated. This risk was not evenly spread among cancer types and vaccination types.
- There was 35% increased relative risk of thyroid cancer, 21% for gastric cancer, 28% for colorectal cancer, 53% for lung cancer, 20% for breast cancer and 69% for prostate cancer. The results for all other cancer types did not fall within the 95% statistical confidence level and therefore did not indicate a clinically meaningful cancer risk.
- The risk for all cancers was 20% if you received mRNA shots and 50% if you received adenovirus vector shots. Only adenovirus vaccines increased the risk of gastric cancer and prostate cancer. Only mRNA vaccines increased the risk of breast cancer. An increased risk of the other statistically significant cancer types (thyroid, lung, and colorectal) held true for both types of vaccines.
- People who received a Pfizer mRNA booster had an even greater risk of gastric cancer than those who only had two shots. In addition they had a clinically significant risk of developing pancreatic cancer, a finding similar to results found in Japanese health data.
The fact that virtually all Seoul residents (98%) are enrolled in the national health insurance scheme means that the study findings are not vulnerable to selection bias, a criticism that has previously been levelled at population based Covid studies demonstrating risks. Thus removing any argument against immediate precautionary action.
Increased risk of cancer following COVID vaccination
No study study covers all possible scenarios:
- Some cancers can take years to develop. This study only looked at cancer incidence in the first year after Covid vaccination. This does not rule out the later development of cancers that might be related to Covid vaccination.
- Some cancers remain undetected. Therefore the actual cancer incidence may be higher than that reported.
- The study does not include any recurrence of cancers following Covid vaccinations, a phenomenon noted by eminent oncologists in the UK and USA.
- Although the association between Covid vaccination and increased cancer risk is proven beyond reasonable doubt, the mechanisms of cancer development following Covid vaccination remain largely unclear and/or unknown. Therefore the authors of the study decided to publish a disclaimer that in their opinion the risk of developing cancer following Covid vaccination could not be finally causally established without understanding the specific mechanism(s) involved. The inclusion of this kind of disclaimer has become routine with all Covid research, since the chance of passing the journal peer review process is very low without it. In other words, the scientific community bias in favour of biotechnology experimentation ensures rejection of any suggestion of absolute risk, whatever the data tells us and this data is damning.
- Although cancer is the second highest cause of mortality, Covid vaccination is also known to be associated with increased incidence of some types of heart disease, neurological illness, kidney disease and mental illness. Therefore the actual risk of some type of serious illness following Covid vaccination is much higher than the cancer risk alone.
This is a very large study with serious implications for public health policy and vaccine regulations. So what has been the reaction of professionals and journalists?
Although the study found a statistically significant association between Covid vaccination and increased cancer risk relative to the unvaccinated, its results have been largely ignored by mainstream media or in some cases dismissed or minimised. The idea that Covid vaccines are a biotechnology miracle has been deeply entrenched in the public psyche through government pronouncements and paid media promotion. Moreover, research scientists are heavily invested in the future of biotechnology research. This bias and the associated preconceptions about safety and effectiveness of biotechnology are proving very hard to shake, even by a study of this magnitude and statistical certainty.
For example, a YouTube video by Canadian microbiologist Dr. Mikolaj Raszek urges caution in interpreting the results and calls for more research. He describes the findings as “sad news” but takes comfort from his description of the overall cancer risk as “low” (can a 27% relative increase in risk really be described as low???). He doesn’t call for an end to Covid shots, instead he admits:
“We can expect to see these increases in cancer to continue moving forward”
And then pledges to keep trying to discover the exact mechanisms involved. In other words, the lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the increased cancer risk is seen as a reason for even more biotechnology research rather than caution.
The horrific weakness of this kind of response should be very obvious to all, the public is being expected to shoulder the burden of an increased cancer risk as scientists continue to research the possible effects of Covid vaccines and presumably other types of mRNA vaccines for humans and animals that are currently being developed. A suggestion worthy of absolute condemnation.
Our government is equally determined to press ahead with mRNA vaccine research and other types of risky biotechnology research. On November 5th the government-supported Marsden Fund awarded a one million dollar grant to a team from Victoria University and the Malaghan Institute to research new mRNA vaccines.
The Korean study has garnered massive publicity on social media from scientists who have repeatedly expressed concerns about Covid vaccine safety, such as renowned cardiologists Dr. Peter A McCullough and Dr. Aseem Malhotra. However, news outlets such as Al Jazeera (which headlined “Did a South Korean study really claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer?”) and others have dismissed factual evidence based solely on the false suggestion that the study demonstrates nothing more than a “pattern” which in their uninformed opinion only suggests that more research should be undertaken on people. Despite this kind of blind and misleading criticism, the study findings are scientifically sound and reliable. They cannot be safely ignored. No one in their right mind could do so. They strike at the heart of matter.
It appears very clear that medical applications of biotechnology developed during the Covid era have been and continue to be inherently risky and unsafe.
The implications of this study for the Royal Commission on Covid-19 Phase 2, which has now completed its evidence gathering and is moving to compile its report, should be broadcast loud and clear. The Commissioners decided not to investigate or evaluate scientific evidence for inexplicable reasons. If they had done so, their conclusions would be very different from those they are currently contemplating. There is an elevated risk of cancer and other serious disease types from Covid-19 vaccines which will be with us for generations. The Commission has in effect decided to ignore evidence, leaving the public in the dark and in danger.
It appears that a significant number of people in NZ may have developed cancer during the last five years who would not have done so if they had refused Covid vaccination or not been subject to mandates.
The public may not be aware that the class of risks from biotechnology experimentation, including Covid vaccines, is unique in many important respects. For example Covid vaccine genetic sequences have been found in some cases to integrate into the recipients’ DNA. In that sense, their effects cannot be contained, recalled or mitigated, there is the possibility they will reverberate down generations. We have written extensively on the risks in our Substack.com articles including Twenty Reasons to Completely Reject Biotechnology Experimentation.
It is not possible to sit on the fence on this issue
Biotechnology experimentation cannot safely coexist with life as we know it. It is in conflict with the natural order and equilibrium that has been established through evolutionary processes over billions of years. A mutually supportive global ecosystem, including human health, relies on genetic relationships which will inevitably be disrupted by biotechnology experimentation. This will happen through novel disease creation of the type which went on at Wuhan and elsewhere, and is still in progress, or through genetic modification of organisms which is accelerating everywhere.
To quote Abraham Lincoln:
A house divided against itself cannot stand.… It will become all one thing or all the other.”
Biotechnology experimentation cannot be contained, it cannot coexist with genetic processes that have developed naturally, it will overwhelm us with disastrous results. The evidence of the Korean cancer study is written large on the screen of the future. Anyone who thinks the findings can be ignored or ridiculed with impunity has lost the sense of life’s meaning or need for protection.
The proposal in the NZ Gene Technology Bill to deregulate biotechnology experimentation is not just reckless, it is suicidal. No one should feel they can stand by and let this happen, leaving the design of reality to uninformed government, paid media and scientists who glibly accept risk to public health and human life. There can be no greater crime at this moment in history. Our World in Data estimates there have been 30 million excess deaths worldwide during the last five years. There has been nothing comparable since the second world war. A new war on humanity is in progress, a war that is being disguised by biotechnology jargon and misleading promises of health. The truth is being kept well hidden. We are being deceived.
Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food testing and safety company (now known as FoodChain ID). You can visit his website hatchardreport.com or subscribe to his Substack.
He is the author of ‘Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness’.
Excellent article, thank you for giving Hatchard a place to publish his ideas.
Well done Guy. You are a brave and educated gentleman. Vilification from the MSM is infact a Medal of Honor.
Its like 911
7/7
All the evidence is there but nothing will be done
Because all are implicated complicit in collusion and collaboration if not through tacitness
That is the cold hard stark truth
All the posturing and lack of action speaks volumes
Thank you once again, Guy Hatchard. We are being deceived. This may be the last living planet in the entire known universe. That glib smile on Ray Kurzweil’s face as he enjoys the fruits of his treacherous pontificating about the benefits of his so called ‘singularity’ where machine and natural human & animal interbreed says it all. Although he is worth a mere $30million today (according to Google) he is in doubt salivating over the prospect of a huge payout. He may, in fact, have secured initial funding from the so called Ivy League universities where extrapolated fiction takes precedence over fact. That seems more likely than worldwide sales of a keyboard synthesiser inferior to the Rhodes piano or the Hammond organ.
Biotechnology experimentation cannot be contained, cannot coexist with genetic processes that have developed naturally. Now Watson the old pervert has gone can we get some sense back into science?
Take diseases, all diseases, and relate them the current elephant in the room: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irjsEc_J4Zk. If, as I read somewhere yesterday, half the bipeds on the planet are currently imposters wearing masks to appear human, they would have great agency in promoting delusional propaganda about pharmaceutical ‘cures’ (you know, the ones which cost thousands of dollars over time before they pull out the ventilator plug)
Ray Kurzweil on how AI will transform the physical world: https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2024/06/17/ray-kurzweil-on-how-ai-will-transform-the-physical-world.
https://www.wired.com/story/big-interview-ray-kurzweil/
versus horrified parents, AI analysts and psychologists on the origin of nightmares that children are now experiencing: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15181193/youtube-ai-disturbing-videos-children-algorithm-parents-fears.html
https://dailytelegraph.co.nz/tech/over-a-million-chatgpt-users-discuss-suicide-weekly-openai/
As if the contradictory and downright fallacious “facts” which the large language models, trained on women’s weeklies, popular mechanics, romance novels and reddit threads, glibly opine were not bad enough, choking up every previously smoothly running system on Earth is now apparently the order of the day.
Biotechnology is nothing short of a thinly disguised killing machine; ten years ago when Satoshi Ōmura showed us the right path we now are virtually arrested and sectioned for daring to even suggest using ivermectin. Let the last word be his: http://www.satoshi-omura.info.” Let us improve life through science and art “
I am a little confused here.
Some have dismissed this study due to it being nothing more than “patterns”
Don”t scientific explanations come from cause and effect relationships which are by definition patterns? This is the very foundation of predicting outcomes.
The globalist uni-party can, and will ignore the results.
“The study also excluded people who died during the study period (30,000 people)”. The question is whether those people died as a result of the jab. According to NZ Medsafe safety report no. 46 there were 3,233 deaths observed during each 3 week monitoring period following a Pfizer covid jab from 19 February 2021 to 30 September 2022.
NZ Health officials have refused to provide a graph showing how many days after receiving a jab that these people died. In theory the deaths should be randomly spread out over the 21 day period. Maybe such a graph would show deaths occurring in the first 72 hours following a covid jab.
Please stop spreading misinformation.
The study didn’t control for likelihood of people being investigated for health issues (and potentially later getting a confirmed diagnosis) being more likely to receive a vaccine,
It didn’t control for different vaccine types having entirely different formations and mechanisms of actions, and it used constructed “hazard ratios” as an indirect estimation, and it did not control for cancer stages, or the interval between vaccine administration and cancer diagnosis (rather the study retrospectively considered ANY cancer diagnosis of any stage within a year of the vaccine being given)
Someone given a vaccine on admission to hospital for suspected metabolic or endocrine issues, then getting diagnosed with stage 3 pancreatic cancer a few days later does not mean the vaccine caused their cancer.
You and the study authors made the incorrect implication that any COVID vaccine causes cancer, but cancer is not one specific thing (there are many different types), and COVID vaccines are not one specific thing (there are several different types). Cancer also takes years to develop, whereas this study only looked at changes within a year
I have reported in detail on a peer reviewed study of 8 million people published in a scientific journal and Brian Jones writes above “Please stop spreading misinformation”. Brian contends that vaccinated people are more likely to have health issues and therefore are more likely to get cancer. This criticism is a version of ‘selection bias’ arguments that are sometimes levelled against smaller studies. This is a huge population study. 98% of the residents of Seoul were followed which suggests that selection bias would not be an issue. Brian’s argument runs as follows: Sick people are more likely to get vaccinated, then they attend hospital where incidentally they find out they have cancer which has been developing over some years prior. Note there is no evidence that this is the case. No evidence that vaccinated people are preferentially sicker than the unvaccinated before vaccination, no evidence at all of what is being suggested. It is a hypothesis that could be tested but hasn’t been. What we do know is that vaccinated people suffer very high rates of adverse effects. This study provides strong evidence that cancer is one of them. Brian’s last paragraph appears to show that he may not have read the whole article In which we differentiate between the types of vaccines and types of cancer. The last sentence is critical, Brian writes “Cancer also takes years to develop, whereas this study only looked at changes within a year” That is what is so shocking about this study, cancers are being detected at a higher rate among vaccinated populations at very short intervals. The study results should be figured into our health policy, instead NZ health data is being deliberately withheld from independent scrutiny.
Don’t worry Guy.
Brooke Van Velden’s covid inquiry will get to the bottom of it.
The inquiry looks to be as successful as Brooke’s other responsibility, getting rid of road cones!
51-million-person study finds COVID-19 “Vaccines” increase risk of respiratory Infections by up to 559%. A landmark study of the entire South Korean population uncovers a VAIDS signal — a dose-dependent rise in the common cold, upper-respiratory infections, pneumonia, and tuberculosis among the vaccinated.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-51-million-person-study
NZ and its medical fraternity is caught in a globalist mindset. Nothing will change this anytime soon. We need to look to RFK jr and his pushback against Big Pharma. Also X is slowly waking people up to the lies. Educate yourself and your loved ones and pray hard.